A journal of one's own

Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 354-360

  Meredith, Tami ^a  

^a SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Authorship; Evolutionary psychology; Feminism; Scholarly publication; Sexism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890872167     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19335377     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0099183     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aarssen, L., Tregenza, T., Budden, A., Lortie, C., Koricheva, J., and Leimu, R. (2008). Band for your buck: Rejection rates and impact factors in ecological journals. The Open Ecology Journal, 1, 14-19.
2. Biaggio, M. (2002). History of the contemporary women's movement. In M. Biaggio and M. Hersen (Eds.) Issues in the Psychology of Women (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., and Tarule, J. (1986). Women's way of knowing. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4. Bird, K. (2011). Do women publish fewer journal articles than men? Sex differences in publication productivity in the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32, 921-937.
5. Buss, D., and Schmitt, D. (2011). Evolutionary psychology and feminism. Sex Roles, 64, 768-787.
6. Canadian Association of University Teachers (2013). CAUT Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Canadian Association of University Teachers.
7. Ceci, S., and Williams, W. (2010). Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3157-3162.
8. Charness, G., and Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83, 50-58.
9. Denmark, F., Russo, N., Frieze, I., and Sechzer, J. (1988). Guidelines for avoiding sexism in psychological research: A report on the ad hoc committee on nonsexist research. American Psychologist, 43, 582-585.
10. Eagly, A. (1978) Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 86-116.
11. Feist, G. (1997). Quantity, quality, and depth of research as influences on scientific eminence: Is quantity most important? Creativity Research Journal, 10, 325-335.
12. Fonow, M., and Cook, J. (1991). Back to the future: A look at the second wave of feminist epistemology and methodology. In M. Fonow and J. Cook (Eds.) Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as research lived. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
13. Lipman, J. (2013). How to get over your fear of "no." Glamour, October, 226-230. Long, J., Allison, P., and McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences in the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58, 703-722.
14. Mairesse, J., and Pezzoni, M. (2013). Does gender affect scientific productivity? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the French Economic Association. Aix-en-Provence, France.
15. Maliniak, D., Powers, R., and Walter, B. (2013). The gender citation gap in international relations. International Organization, FirstView, 1-34.
16. Meredith, T. (2013). A new view of evolutionary psychology using women's priorities and motivations. In M. Fisher, J. Garcia, and R. Sokol Chang (Eds.) Evolution's Empress: Darwinian Perspectives on the Nature of Women (pp. 371-389). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Millman, M., and Kanter, R. (Eds.) (1975). Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social sciences. Garden City, NY: Anchor books.
18. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Riger, S. (1992). Epistemological debates, feminist voices. American Psychologist, 47, 730-740.
20. Sherif, C. (1979). Bias in psychology. In J. Sherman and E. Beck (Eds.), A prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp. 93-133). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
21. Shurchkov, O. (2012). Under pressure: Gender differences in output quality and quantity under competition and time constraints. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 1189-1213.
22. Sprague, J., and Zimmerman, M. (1989). Quality and quantity: Reconstructing feminist methodology. The American Sociologist, 20, 71-86.
23. Weisstein, N. (1971). Psychology constructs the female: Or, the fantasy life of the male psychologist. Boston, MA: New England Free Press.
24. Wennerås, C., and Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341-343.
25. West, J., Jacquet, J., King, M., Correll, S., and Bergstrom, C. (2013). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE, 8, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.