Fatigue of multiscale composites with secondary nanoplatelet reinforcement: 3D computational analysis

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 91, Issue , 2014, Pages 71-81

  Dai, Gaoming ^a   Mishnaevsky, Leon ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

A. Nanocomposites; A. Polymer matrix composites (PMCs); B. Fatigue; C. Computational mechanics; C. Finite element analysis (FEA)

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CRACKS; FATIGUE DAMAGE; FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; FIBERS; NANOCOMPOSITES; REINFORCEMENT;

3-D NUMERICAL SIMULATION; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES; FIBER/MATRIX INTERFACE; MULTI-SCALE COMPOSITES; NANOCLAY REINFORCEMENT; NUMERICAL EXPERIMENTS; POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES (PMCS);

POLYMER MATRIX COMPOSITES;

EID: 84890864542     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.024     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Mishnaevsky L. Micromechanics of hierarchical materials: a brief overview. Rev Adv Mater Sci 2012, 30:60-72.
2. Tang Y., Ye L.L., Zhang Z., Friedrich K. Interlaminar fracture toughness and CAI strength of fiber-reinforced composites with nanoparticles - a review. Compos Sci Technol 2013, 86:26-37.
3. Dai G.M., Mishnaevsky L. Damage evolution in nanoclay-reinforced polymers: a three-dimensional computational study. Compos Sci Technol 2013, 74:67-77.
4. Siddiqui N., et al. Mode I interlaminar fracture behavior and mechanical properties of CFRPs with nanoclay-filled epoxy matrix. Composites A 2007, 38:449-460.
5. Wang H.W., et al. Nanoreinforced polymer composites: 3D FEM modeling with effective interface concept. Compos Sci Technol 2011, 71:980-988.
6. Rice B.P., Chen C., Cloos L., Curliss D. Carbon fiber composites: organoclay-aerospace epoxy nanocomposites. Part I. SAMPE J 2001, 37:7-9.
7. Becker O., Varley R.J., Simon G.P. Use of layered silicates to supplementary toughen high performance epoxy carbon fiber composites. J Mater Sci Lett 2003, 22:1411-1414.
8. Khan S.U., et al. Fatigue damage behaviors of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites containing nanoclay. Compos Sci Technol 2010, 70:2077-2085.
9. Xu Y., Hoa S.V. Mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy/clay nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 2008, 68:854-861.
10. Manjunatha C.M., et al. Enhanced fatigue behavior of a glass fiber reinforced hybrid particles modified epoxy nanocomposite under WISPERX spectrum load sequence. Int J Fatigue 2013, 54:25-31.
11. Karippal J.J., et al. Study of mechanical properties of epoxy/glass/nanoclay hybrid composites. J Compos Mater 2011, 45:1893-1899.
12. Quaresimin M., Varley R.J. Understanding the effect of nanomodifier addition upon the properties of fibre reinforced laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2008, 68:718-726.
13. Pedrazzoli D., Pegoretti A. Silica nanoparticles as coupling agents for polypropylene/glass composites. Compos Sci Technol 2013, 76:77-83.
14. Liu L., Li L., Gao Y., Tang L., Zhang Z. Single carbon fiber fracture embedded in an epoxy matrix modified by nanoparticles. Compos Sci Technol 2013, 77:101-109.
15. Díez-Pascual AM et al. Multiscale fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites incorporating carbon nanotubes: a review. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2013.06.003.
16. De Greef N., et al. The effect of carbon nanotubes on the damage development of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Carbon 2011, 49:4650-4664.
17. Godara A., et al. Interfacial shear strength of a glass fiber/epoxy bonding in composites modified with carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol 2010, 70:1346-1352.
18. Godara A., et al. Influence of carbon nanotubes reinforcement on the processing and the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Carbon 2009, 47:2914-2923.
19. Warrier A., et al. The effect of adding carbon nanotubes to glass/epoxy composites in the fibre sizing and/or the matrix. Composites A 2010, 41:532-538.
20. Siddiqui N., et al. Tensile strength of glass fibres with carbon nanotube-epoxy nanocomposite coating. Composites A 2009, 40:1606-1614.
21. Mishnaevsky L., Brøndsted P. Micromechanical modeling of damage and fracture of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites: a review. Comput Mater Sci 2009, 44:1351-1359.
22. Mishnaevsky L. Functionally gradient metal matrix composites: numerical analysis of the microstructure-strength relationships. Compos Sci Technol 2006, 66:1873-1887.
23. Qing H., Mishnaevsky L. Unidirectional high fiber content composites: automatic 3D FE model generation and damage simulation. Comput Mater Sci 2009, 47:548-555.
24. Piat R., Schnack E. Hierarchical material modeling of carbon/carbon composites. Carbon 2003, 41:2121-2129.
25. Libanori R., et al. Hierarchical reinforcement of polyurethane-based composites with inorganic micro- and nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol 2012, 72:435-445.
26. Misra R.D.K., Yuan Q., Chen J., Yang Y. Hierarchical structures and phase nucleation and growth during pressure-induced crystallization of polypropylene containing dispersion of nanoclay. Mater Sci Eng, A 2010, 527:2163-2181.
27. Mishnaevsky L., Brøndsted P. Micromechanisms of damage in unidirectional fiber reinforced composites: 3d computational analysis. Compos Sci Technol 2009, 69:1036-1044.
28. Mishnaevsky L., Brøndsted P. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of damage initiation in UD fiber-reinforced composites with ductile matrix. Mater Sci Eng A 2008, 498:81-86.
29. Wang H.W., et al. Single fibre and multifibre unit cell analysis of strength and cracking of unidirectional composites. Comput Mater Sci 2009, 46:810-820.
30. Mishnaevsky L. Micromechanical analysis of nanocomposites using 3D voxel based material model. Compos Sci Technol 2012, 72:1167-1177.
31. Krueger R. Development of a benchmark example for delamination fatigue growth prediction. In: Proceedings-american society for composites, 2, no. conf.,2010; 25: 948-967.
32. Belytschko T., Gracie R., Ventura G. A review of extended/generalized finite element methods for material modeling. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 2009, 17:1-24.
33. Mishnaevsky L., Lippmann N., Schmauder S. Computational modeling of crack propagation in real microstructures of steels and virtual testing of artificial materials. Int J Fracture 2003, 120:581-600.
34. Reeder JR. 3D mixed-mode delamination fracture criteria-an experimentalist's perspective. NASA langley research center, M/S 188E, Hampton VA 23681-2199, 2006, USA.
35. Liao W.C., Sun C.T. The determination of mode III fracture toughness in thick composite laminates. Compos Sci Technol 1996, 56:489-499.
36. Reeder JR. A bilinear failure criterion for mixed-mode delamination. Composite materials: testing and design. ASTM STP 1206, Camponeschi Jr ET, editor. ASTM Int., W. Conshohochen, PA, 1993, pp. 303-322.
37. Pinho S.T., Robinson P., Iannucci L. Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fiber failure modes in laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 2006, 66:2069-2079.
38. Jose S., Kuma R.K., Jana M.K., Rao G.V. Intralaminar fracture toughness of cross-ply laminate and its constituent sub-laminates. Compos Sci Technol 2001, 61:1115-1122.
39. Krueger R. Development of a benchmark example for delamination fatigue growth prediction. NASA/CR-2010-216723, NIA report No. 2010-04, 2010.
40. Branco R., Antunes F.V., Martins Ferreira J.A., Silva J.M. Determination of Paris law constants with a reverse engineering technique. Eng Fail Anal 2009, 16:631-638.
41. Seitl S., Kersner Z., Bilek V., Knesl Z. Glass fiber reinforced cement based composite: fatigue and fracture parameters. Appl Comput Mech. 2009, 3:363-374.
42. Creed R.F. High cycle tensile fatigue of unidirectional fiberglass composite tested at high frequency 1993, Montana State University.
43. Bureau M.N., Perrin F., Denault J., Dickson J.I. Interlaminar fatigue crack propagation in continuous glass fiber/polypropylene composites. Int J Fatigue 2002, 24:99-108.
44. Fenner JS, Daniel IM. Fracture toughness and fatigue behavior of nanoreinforced carbon/epoxy composites. Experimental mechanics of composite, hybrid, and multifunctional materials, vol. 6. In: Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference on experimental and applied mechanics, springer, 2013.
45. Qiu J.J., Zhang C., Wang B., Liang R. Carbon nanotube integrated multifunctional multiscale composites. Nanotechnology 2007, 18. 275708(11pp).
46. Wicks SS et al. Model-Experiment Correlation for mode I interlaminar toughening of composite interfaces reinforced with aligned carbon nanotubes. In: ICCM17proceedings, E1.27, July 27-31, Edinburgh, UK, 2009.
47. Ma P.C., et al. Development of functional glass fibers with nanocomposite coating: a comparative study. Composites A 2013, 44:16-22.