Evaluation Guidelines for the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSAs)

Clinical and Translational Science

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 303-309

  Trochim, William M ^a   Rubio, Doris M ^b   Thomas, Veronica G ^c  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c HOWARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CTSA; Evaluation; Translational research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; EDUCATION; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; PLANNING; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; STANDARD; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

CTSA; EVALUATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; POLICY; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84890858776     PISSN: 17528054     EISSN: 17528062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cts.12036     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Patton MQ. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 4th ed. London, England: Sage; 2008.
2. American Evaluation Association. Guiding Principles for Evaluators. http://www.eval.org/publications/GuidingPrinciplesPrintable.asp. Ratified July 2004. Accessed May 11, 2011.
3. Yarbrough DB, Shulha LM, Hopson RK, Caruthers FA. The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2011.
4. Dougherty D, Conway PH. The "3T's" road map to transform US health care: the "how" of high-quality care. JAMA. 2008; 299(19): 2319-2321.
5. Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Yoon PW, Dowling N, Moore CA, Bradley L. The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention? Genet Med. 2007; 9(10): 665-674.
6. Sung NS, Crowley WFJr, Genel M, Salber P, Sandy L, Sherwood LM, Johnson SB, Catanese V, Tilson H, Getz K, et al. Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. JAMA. 2003; 289(10): 1278-1287.
7. Trochim W, Kane C, Graham MJ, Pincus HA. Evaluating translational research: a process marker model. Clin Transl Sci. 2011; 4(3): 153-162.
8. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-"Blue highways" on the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007; 297(4): 403-406.
9. Rubio DM, Del Junco DJ, Bhore R, Lindsell CJ, Oster RA, Wittkowski KM, Welty LJ, Li YJ, Demets D. Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Key Function Committee of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Consortium. Evaluation metrics for biostatistical and epidemiological collaborations. Stat Med. 2011; 30(23): 2767-2777.
10. Patton MQ. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2011.
11. Williams B, Hummelbrunner R. Systems Concepts in Action: A Practitioner's Toolkit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010.
12. Williams B, Imam I, eds. Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Point Reyes, CA: EdgePress; 2006.
13. American Evaluation Association. An Evaluation Roadmap for a More Effective Government. http://www.eval.org/EPTF/aea10.roadmap.101910.pdf. September 2010. Accessed May 11, 2011.
14. Cooksy LJ, Mark MM, Trochim WM. Evaluation policy and evaluation practice: where do we go from here? New Directions for Evaluation. 2009; 123: 103-109.
15. American Evaluation Association. External Citations and Use of Evaluation Policy Task Force Work. http://www.eval.org/EPTF/citations.asp. Cited September 2011. Accessed September 7, 2011.