Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review

Andrology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 20-24

  Deruyver, Y ^a   Vanderschueren, D ^a   Van der Aa, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Microdissection sperm extraction; Non obstructive azoospermia; Testicular sperm extraction

Indexed keywords

AZOOSPERMIA; CLINICAL STUDY; CONVENTIONAL TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION; ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLITROPIN BLOOD LEVEL; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MICRODISSECTION; MICRODISSECTION TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SERTOLI CELL ONLY SYNDROME; SPERM RETRIEVAL; SPERMATOGENESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION;

MICRODISSECTION SPERM EXTRACTION; NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA; TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION;

AZOOSPERMIA; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; HUMANS; MALE; MICRODISSECTION; OLIGOSPERMIA; SERTOLI CELL-ONLY SYNDROME; SPERM RETRIEVAL; SPERMATOZOA; TESTIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84890844930     PISSN: 20472919     EISSN: 20472927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00148.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R & Zohdy W. (2000) Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 15, 653-656.
2. Colpi GM, Colpi EM, Piediferro G, Giacchetta D, Gazzano G, Castiglioni FM et al. (2009) Microsurgical TESE versus conventional TESE for ICSI in non-obstructive azoospermia: a randomized controlled study. Reprod BioMed Online 18, 315-319.
3. Donoso P, Tournaye H & Devroey P. (2007) Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 13, 539-549.
4. Ezeh UI. (2000) Beyond the clinical classification of azoospermia: opinion. Hum Reprod 15, 2356-2359.
5. Friedler S, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Soffer Y, Komarovsky D & Ron-El R. (1997) Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 12, 1488-1493.
6. Ghalayini IF, Al-Ghazo MA, Hani OB, Al-Azab R, Bani-Hani I, Zayed F et al. (2011) Clinical comparison of conventional testicular sperm extraction and microdissection techniques for non-obstructive azoospermia. J Clin Med Res 3, 124-131.
7. Ishikawa T, Nose R, Matsui T, Kamidono S & Fujisawa M. (2010) Learning curves of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 25, i108.
8. Jarow JP, Espeland MA & Lipshultz LI. (1989) Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 142, 62-65.
9. McDougal SW, Alan WJ, Louis RK, Andrew CN, Alan WP, Craig AP et al. (2011) Campbell-Walsh Urology 10th International Edition, pp. 633, Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia.
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J & Altman DG; PRISMA Group. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6, e1000097.
11. Mulhall JP, Ghaly SW, Aviv N & Ahmed A. (2005) The utility of optical loupe magnification for testis sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Androl 26, 178-181.
12. Nagpal BL, Manjari M, Kapoor K & Dhaliwal US. (1993) Testicular biopsy in cases of male infertility: a retrospective study. J Indian Med Assoc 91, 171-174.
13. Okada H, Dobashi M, Yamazaki T, Hara I, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S et al. (2002) Conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 168, 1063-1067.
14. Ostad M, Liotta D, Ye Z & Schlegel PN. (1998) Testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia: results of a multibiopsy approach with optimized tissue dispersion. Urology 52, 692-696.
15. Raman JD & Schlegel PN. (2003) Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is successful for the treatment of nonobstructive azoospermia associated with cryptorchidism. J Urol 170, 1287-1290.
16. Ramasamy R, Yagan N & Schlegel PN. (2005) Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 65, 1190-1194.
17. Ramasamy R, Lin K, Gosden LV, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD & Schlegel PN. (2009) High serum FSH levels in men with nonobstructive azoospermia does not affect success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril 92, 590-593.
18. Schlegel PN. (1999) Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod 14, 131-135.
19. Schlegel PN & Su LM. (1997) Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod 12, 1688-1692.
20. Silber SJ. (2000) Microsurgical TESE and the distribution of spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 15, 2278-2284.
21. Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, Miyagawa Y, Tohda A, Miura H, Nishimura K et al. (2002) Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study. Hum Reprod 17, 2924-2929.
22. Turunc T, Gul U, Haydardedeoglu B, Bal N, Kuzgunbay B, Peskircioglu L et al. (2010) Conventional testicular sperm extraction combined with the microdissection technique in nonobstructive azoospermic patients: a prospective comparative study. Fertil Steril 94, 2157-2160.