Users’ interactions with design models

Human Factors and Ergonomics in Consumer Product Design: Methods and Techniques

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 429-440

  Rooden, M J ^a   Kanis, H ^b  

^a THE HAGUE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; PHYSICAL THERAPY;

DESIGN MODELING; DESIGN MODELS; DESIGN PROCESS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; POTENTIAL USERS; PRODUCT ASSESSMENT; USABILITY PROBLEMS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84890802459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (13)

1. Buur, J., Bagger, K., and Binder, T. 1997. Turning usability testing into user dialogue. In Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, eds. P. Seppala, T. Luopajarvi, C.H. Nygard, and M. Mattila, vol. 2, 132-34. Tampere: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
2. de Bont, C.P.M. 1992. Consumer evaluations of early product concepts. Thesis, Delft University Press.
3. Fay, D., Hurwitz, J., and Teare, S. 1990. The use of low-fidelity prototypes in user interface design. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, 23-31. HFT, Torino, Italy.
4. Kirlik, A. 1995. Requirements for psychological models to support design: Toward ecological task analysis. In Global Perspectives on the Ecology of Human-Machine Systems, eds. J.M. Flach, P.A. Hancock, J.K. Caird, and K.J. Vicente, 68-120. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Moggridge, B. 2007. Designing Interactions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Norman, D.A. 1983. Some observations on mental models. In Mental Models, eds. D. Genter and A.L. Stevens, 7-14. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Prümper, J., Heinbokel, T., and Kuting, H.J. 1993. Virtuelle Prototypen als Werkzeuge zur benutzercentrierten Productentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft 47 (3): 160-67.
8. Rasmussen, J. 1983. Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems and Cybernetics SMC-13 (3): 257-66.
9. Rooden, M.J. 2001. Design models for anticipating future usage. Thesis, Delft University of Technology.
10. Rooden, M.J., Green, W.S., and Kanis, H. 1999. Difficulties in usage of a coffee maker predicted on the basis of design models. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting, 6-941-44. Houston, Texas: HFES, Santa Monica, California.
11. Tamler, H. 1998. How (much) to intervene in a usability session. Common Ground 8 (3), 11-15.
12. Virzi, R.A., Sokolov, J.L., and Karis, D. 1996. Usability problem identification using both low-and high-fidel-ity prototypes. In CHI Conference Proceedings Human Factors in Computing Systems, eds. M.J. Tauber, V. Bellotti, R. Jeffries, J.D. Mackinaly, and J. Nielsen, 236-43.
13. Wiklund, M.E., Thurrott, C., and Dumas, J.S. 1992. Does the fidelity of software prototypes affect the perception of usability? In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, 399-403. Atlanta, Georgia: HFS, Santa Monica, California.