Facilitation as a ubiquitous driver of biodiversity

New Phytologist

Volumn 201, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 403-416

  Mcintire, Eliot J B ^a,b   Fajardo, Alex ^c  

^a LAURENTIAN FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Coexistence; Facilitation; Intransitive competition; Plant functional traits; Positive interactions; Resource sharing; Stress gradient hypothesis (SGH)

Indexed keywords

BIOTIC FACTOR; COEXISTENCE; FACILITATION; PLANT COMMUNITY; RESOURCE USE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; TROPHIC LEVEL;

ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVOLUTION; FOOD CHAIN; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FOOD CHAIN; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SOCIAL FACILITATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84890792058     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12478     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Aarssen LW, Schamp BS, Pither J. 2006. Why are there so many small plants? Implications for species coexistence. Journal of Ecology 94: 569-580.
2. Adams MJ, Pearl CA, Bury RB. 2003. Indirect facilitation of an anuran invasion by non-native fishes. Ecology Letters 6: 343-351.
3. Adler PB, Fajardo A, Kleinhesselink AR, Kraft NJB. 2013. Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. Ecology Letters. doi: 10.1111/ele.12157.
4. Allee WC, Emerson AE, Park O, Park T, Schmidt KP. 1949. Principles of animal ecology. Philadelphia, PA, USA: W. B. Saunders.
5. Allesina S, Levine JM. 2011. A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 5638-5642.
6. Axelrod R, Hamilton WD. 1981. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390-1396.
7. Badano EI, Jones CA, Cavieres LA, Wright JP. 2006. Assessing impacts of ecosystem engineers on community organization: a general approach illustrated by effects of a high-Andean cushion plant. Oikos 115: 369-385.
8. Bartels SF, Chen HYH. 2010. Is understory plant species diversity driven by resource quantity or resource heterogeneity? Ecology 91: 1931-1938.
9. Bertness MD, Callaway RM. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 191-193.
10. Bronstein JL. 2009. The evolution of facilitation and mutualism. Journal of Ecology 97: 1160-1170.
11. Brooker RW, Maestre FT, Callaway RM, Lortie CJ, Cavieres LA, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, Tielbörger K, Travis JMJ, Anthelme F et al. 2008. Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future. Journal of Ecology 96: 18-34.
12. Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 119-125.
13. Butterfield BJ, Briggs JM. 2011. Regeneration niche differentiates functional strategies of desert woody plant species. Oecologia 165: 477-487.
14. Butterfield BJ, Callaway RM. 2013. A functional comparative approach to facilitation and its context dependence. Functional Ecology 27: 907-917.
15. Butterfield BJ, Cavieres LA, Callaway RM, Cook BJ, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Schöb C, Xiao S et al. 2013. Alpine cushion plants inhibit the loss of phylogenetic diversity in severe environments. Ecology Letters 16: 478-486.
16. Cain ML, Bowman WD, Hacker SD. 2011. Ecology. Suntherland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.
17. Callaway RM. 1995. Positive interactions among plants. The Botanical Review 61: 306-349.
18. Callaway RM. 2007. Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
19. Callaway RM, Pennings SC. 1998. Impact of a parasitic plant on the zonation of two salt marsh perennials. Oecologia 114: 100-105.
20. Cerfonteyn ME, le Roux PC, Jansen van Vuuren B, Born C. 2011. Cryptic spatial aggregation of the cushion plant Azorella selago (Apiaceae) revealed by a multilocus molecular approach suggests frequent intraspecific facilitation under sub-Antarctic conditions. American Journal of Botany 98: 909-914.
21. Chapin FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharman LC. 1994. Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at glacier bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs 64: 149-175.
22. Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343-366.
23. Clark JS. 2010. Individuals and the variation needed for high species diversity in forest trees. Science 327: 1129-1132.
24. Clark JS. 2012. The coherence problem with the Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 198-202.
25. Clements FE. 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology 24: 252-284.
26. Connell JH, Slatyer RO. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist 111: 1119-1144.
27. Czárán TL, Hoekstra RF, Pagie L. 2002. Chemical warfare between microbes promotes biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 99: 786-790.
28. Danchin E, Giraldeau L-A, Valone TJ, Wagner RH. 2004. Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305: 487-491.
29. Dethier MN, Duggins DO. 1984. An "indirect commensalism" between marine herbivores and the importance of competitive hierarchies. The American Naturalist 124: 205-219.
30. Fajardo A, McIntire EJB. 2011. Under strong niche overlap conspecifics do not compete but help each other to survive: facilitation at the intraspecific level. Journal of Ecology 99: 642-650.
31. Filotas E, Grant M, Parrott L, Rikvold PA. 2010. The effect of positive interactions on community structure in a multi-species metacommunity model along an environmental gradient. Ecological Modelling 221: 885-894.
32. Frean M, Abraham ER. 2001. Rock-scissors-paper and the survival of the weakest. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B Biological Sciences 268: 1323-1327.
33. Gause GF, Witt AA. 1935. Behavior of mixed populations and the problem of natural selection. The American Naturalist 69: 596-609.
34. Gedan KB, Bertness MD. 2010. How will warming affect the salt marsh foundation species Spartina patens and its ecological role? Oecologia 164: 479-487.
35. Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Gómez JM, Hódar JA, Castro J, Baraza E. 2004. Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants. Ecological Applications 14: 1128-1138.
36. Gross K. 2008. Positive interactions among competitors can produce species-rich communities. Ecology Letters 11: 929-936.
37. Gross N, Börger L, Soriano-Morales SI, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Quero JL, García-Gómez M, Valencia-Gómez E, Maestre FT. 2013. Uncovering multiscale effects of aridity and biotic interactions on the functional structure of Mediterranean shrublands. Journal of Ecology 101: 637-649.
38. Gross N, Kunstler G, Liancourt P, de Bello F, Suding KN, Lavorel S. 2009. Linking individual response to biotic interactions with community structure: a trait-based approach. Functional Ecology 23: 1167-1178.
39. Hacker SD, Gaines SD. 1997. Some implications of direct positive interactions for community species diversity. Ecology 78: 1990-2003.
40. Hairston NG, Smith FE, Slobodkin LB. 1960. Community structure, population control, and competition. The American Naturalist 94: 421-425.
41. Halpern BS, Silliman BR, Olden JD, Bruno JF, Bertness MD. 2007. Incorporating positive interactions in aquatic restoration and conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5: 153-160.
42. Halpern CB, Spies TA. 1995. Plant species diversity in natural and managed forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecological Applications 5: 913-934.
43. Harrington CA, Reukema DL. 1983. Initial shock and long-term stand development following thinning in a Douglas-fir plantation. Forest Science 29: 33-46.
44. Hay ME, Parker JD, Burkepile DE, Caudill CC, Wilson AE, Hallinan ZP, Chequer AD. 2004. Mutualisms and aquatic community structure: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 35: 175-197.
45. He Q, Bertness MD, Altieri AH. 2013. Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress. Ecology Letters 16: 695-706.
46. Holmgren M, Scheffer M. 2010. Strong facilitation in mild environments: the stress gradient hypothesis revisited. Journal of Ecology 98: 1269-1275.
47. Hubbell SP. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
48. Hubbell SP. 2005. Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Functional Ecology 19: 166-172.
49. Hunter AF, Aarssen LW. 1988. Plants helping plants. BioScience 38: 34-40.
50. Janzen DH. 1974. Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae. Biotropica 6: 69-103.
51. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373-386.
52. Kéfi S, van Baalen M, Rietkerk M, Loreau M. 2008. Evolution of local facilitation in arid ecosystems. The American Naturalist 172: E1-E17.
53. Kelly D, Sork VL. 2002. Mast seeding in perennial plants. Why, how, where? Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 427-447.
54. Kikvidze Z, Callaway RM. 2009. Ecological facilitation may drive major evolutionary transitions. BioScience 59: 399-404.
55. Körner C. 2003. Limitation and stress - always or never? Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 141-143.
56. Kraft NJB, Valencia R, Ackerly DD. 2008. Functional traits and niche-based tree community assembly in an Amazonian forest. Science 322: 580-582.
57. Kropotkin P. 1902. Mutual aid: a factor in evolution. London, UK: Heinemann.
58. Kylafis G, Loreau M. 2011. Niche construction in the light of niche theory. Ecology Letters 14: 82-90.
59. Laird RA, Schamp BS. 2006. Competitive intransitivity promotes species coexistence. The American Naturalist 168: 182-193.
60. Laird RA, Schamp BS. 2009. Species coexistence, intrasitivity, and topological variation in competitive tournaments. Journal of Theoretical Biology 256: 90-95.
61. Leicht-Young S, Latimer AM, Silander JA. 2011. Lianas escape self-thinning: experimental evidence of positive density dependence in temperate lianas Celastrus orbiculatus and C. scandens. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13: 163-172.
62. Levi T, Wilmers CC. 2012. Wolves-coyotes-foxes: a cascade among carnivores. Ecology 93: 921-929.
63. Levine JM. 1999. Indirect facilitation: evidence and predictions from a riparian community. Ecology 80: 1762-1769.
64. Levine JM, HilleRisLambers J. 2009. The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature 461: 254-257.
65. Li L, Li S-M, Sun J-H, Zhou L-L, Bao X-G, Zhang H-G, Zhang F-S. 2007. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 11192-11196.
66. Lortie CJ, Brooker RW, Choler P, Kikvidze Z, Michalet R, Pugnaire FI, Callaway RM. 2004. Rethinking plant community theory. Oikos 107: 433-438.
67. Lowman MD, Schowalter TD. 2012. Plant science in forest canopies - the first 30 years of advances and challenges (1980-2010). New Phytologist 194: 12-27.
68. MacDougall AS, Gilbert B, Levine JM. 2009. Plant invasions and the niche. Journal of Ecology 97: 609-615.
69. Madsen MD, Davies KW, Williams CJ, Svejcar TJ. 2012. Agglomerating seeds to enhance native seedling emergence and growth. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 431-438.
70. May RM. 1981. Theoretical ecology: principles and applications. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.
71. McGill BJ, Maurer BA, Weiser MD. 2006. Empirical evaluation of neutral theory. Ecology 87: 1411-1423.
72. McIntire EJB, Fajardo A. 2011. Facilitation within species: a possible origin of group selected superorganisms. The American Naturalist 178: 88-97.
73. Michalet R, Brooker RW, Cavieres LA, Kikvidze Z, Lortie CJ, Pugnaire FI, Valiente-Banuet A, Callaway RM. 2006. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecology Letters 9: 767-773.
74. Mills LS, Soulé ME, Doak DF. 1993. The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience 43: 219-224.
75. Mittelbach GG. 2012. Community ecology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates, Inc..
76. Mittelbach GG, Steiner CF, Scheiner SM, Gross KL, Reynolds HL, Waide RB, Willig MR. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82: 2381-2396.
77. Newman EI, Ritz K. 1986. Evidence on the pathways of phosphorus transfer between vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. New Phytologist 104: 77-87.
78. Nilsson M-C, Wardle DA. 2005. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 421-428.
79. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW. 2003. Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution (Monographs in Population Biology, 37). Princeton, NJ, USA and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
80. Pages J-P, Michalet R. 2003. A test of the indirect facilitation model in a temperate hardwood forest of the northern French Alps. Journal of Ecology 91: 932-940.
81. Pugnaire FI, Armas C, Valladares F. 2004. Soil as a mediator in plant-plant interactions in a semi-arid community. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 85-92.
82. Ricklefs RE, Renner SS. 2012. Global correlations in tropical tree species richness and abundance reject neutrality. Science 335: 464-467.
83. Saccone P, Pagès J-P, Girel J, Brun J-J, Michalet R. 2010. Acer negundo invasion along a successional gradient: early direct facilitation by native pioneers and late indirect facilitation by conspecifics. New Phytologist 187: 831-842.
84. Schöb C, Armas C, Pugnaire F. 2013. Direct and indirect interactions co-determine species composition in nurse plant systems. Oikos 9: 1371-1379.
85. Schöb C, Butterfield BJ, Pugnaire FI. 2012. Foundation species influence trait-based community assembly. New Phytologist 196: 835-844.
86. Seppänen J-T, Forsman JT, Mönkkönen M, Thompson RL. 2007. Social information use is a process across time, space, and ecology, reaching heterospecifics. Ecology 88: 1622-1633.
87. Sher AA, Marshall DL, Taylor JP. 2002. Establishment patterns of native Populus and Salix in the presence of invasive nonnative Tamarix. Ecological Applications 12: 760-772.
88. Shibata M, Tanaka H, Iida S, Abe S, Masaki T, Niiyama K, Nakashizuka T. 2002. Synchronized annual seed production by 16 principal tree species in a temperate deciduous forest, Japan. Ecology 83: 1727-1742.
89. Sillett SC, Antoine ME. 2004. Lichens and bryophytes in forest canopies. In: Lowman M, Rinker HB, eds. Forest canopie. Burlington, MA, USA: Academic Press, 151-173.
90. Silvertown J. 2004. Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 605-611.
91. Simard SW, Perry DA, Jones MD, Myrold DD, Durall DM, Molina R. 1997. Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature 388: 579-582.
92. Simberloff D. 2004. Community ecology: is it time to move on? The American Naturalist 163: 787-799.
93. Simberloff D. 2006. Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? Ecology Letters 9: 912-919.
94. Simms EL, Taylor DL, Povich J, Shefferson RP. 2006. An empirical test of the partner choice mechanisms in a wild legume-rhizobium interaction. Proceedings of the Royal Society. B Biological Sciences 273: 77-81.
95. Sinclair ARE. 1985. Does interspecific competition or predation shape the African ungulate community? Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 899-918.
96. Smith GD, Carroll AL, Lindgren S. 2011. Facilitation in bark beetles: endemic mountain pine beetle gets a helping hand. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 13: 37-43.
97. Soliveres S, Eldridge DJ, Maestre FT, Bowker MA, Tighe M, Escudero A. 2011. Microhabitat amelioration and reduced competition among understorey plants as drivers of facilitation across environmental gradients: towards a unifying framework. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 13: 247-258.
98. Spasojevic MJ, Suding KN. 2012. Inferring community assembly mechanisms from functional diversity patterns: the importance of multiple assembly processes. Journal of Ecology 100: 652-661.
99. Stachowicz JJ. 2001. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. BioScience 51: 235-246.
100. Stachowicz JJ, Tilman D. 2005. Species invasions and the relationships between species diversity, community saturation, and ecosystem functioning. In: Sax DF, Stachowicz JJ, Gaines SD, eds. Insights into ecology, evolution and biogeography. Sunderland, MA, USA: Academic Press, 41-64.
101. Stone L, Roberts A. 1991. Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72: 1964-1972.
102. Suding KN, Collins SL, Gough L, Clark C, Cleland EE, Gross KL, Milchunas DG, Pennings S. 2005. Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102: 4387-4392.
103. Tarroux E, DesRochers A. 2011. Effect of natural root grafting on growth response of Jack pine (Pinus banksiana; Pinaceae). American Journal of Botany 98: 967-974.
104. Tarroux E, DesRochers A, Krause C. 2010. Effect of natural root grafting on growth response of Jack pine (Pinus banksiana) after commercial thinning. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 526-535.
105. Thompson DB, Brown JH, Spencer WD. 1991. Indirect facilitation of granivorous birds by desert rodents: experimental evidence from foraging patterns. Ecology 72: 852-863.
106. Thorpe AS, Thelen GC, Diaconu A, Callaway RM. 2009. Root exudate is allelopathic in invaded community but not in native community: field evidence for the novel weapons hypothesis. Journal of Ecology 97: 641-645.
107. Tielbörger K, Kadmon R. 2000. Indirect effects in a dessert plant community: is competition among annuals more intense under shrub canopies? Plant Ecology 150: 53-63.
108. Tilman D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
109. Travis JMJ, Brooker RW, Dytham C. 2005. The interplay of positive and negative species interactions across an environmental gradient: insights from an individual-based simulation model. Biology Letters 1: 5-8.
110. Uitdehaag JCM. 2011. Bet hedging based cooperation can limit kin selection and form a basis for mutualism. Journal of Theoretical Biology 280: 76-87.
111. Valiente-Banuet A, Verdú M. 2007. Facilitation can increase the phylogenetic diversity of plant communities. Ecology Letters 10: 1029-1036.
112. Vandermeer J, Hazlett B, Rathcke B. 1985. Indirect facilitation and mutualism. In: Boucher DH, ed. The biology of mutualism: ecology and evolution. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 327-343.
113. Verdú M, Valiente-Banuet A. 2008. The nested assembly of plant facilitation networks prevents species extinction. The American Naturalist 172: 751-760.
114. Vincent M, Krause C, Zhang SY. 2009. Radial growth response of black spruce roots and stems to commercial thinning in the boreal forest. Forestry 82: 557-571.
115. Watson DM. 2009. Parasitic plants as facilitators: more Dryad than Dracula? Journal of Ecology 97: 1151-1159.
116. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ. 2002. Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 125-159.
117. nd edn. Oxford, UK: CAB International.
118. Zhang F, Li L. 2003. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil 248: 305-312.
119. Zou C, Barnes P, Archer S, McMurtry C. 2005. Soil moisture redistribution as a mechanism of facilitation in savanna tree-shrub clusters. Oecologia 145: 32-40.