Head movement during CT brain perfusion acquisition of patientswith suspected acute ischemic stroke

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 2334-2341

  Fahmi, F ^a   Beenen, L F M ^a,c   Streekstra, G J ^a,c   Janssen, N Y ^a   De Jong, H W ^b,c   Riordan, A ^b   Roos, Y B ^a   Majoie, C B ^a   Van Bavel, E ^a   Marquering, H A ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c Department of Radiology ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Head movements; Perfusion; Stroke

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE; ULTRAVIST 320; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN PERFUSION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATION;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HEAD MOVEMENTS; PERFUSION; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890788941     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.039     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regionalburden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of populationhealth data. Lancet 2006;367(9524):1747-57.
2. Poungvarin N. Stroke in the developing world. Lancet 1998;352(Suppl.3): SIII19-22.
3. Klotz E, Konig M. Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT forthe quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke. Eur J Radiol1999;30(3):170-84.
4. Hachaj T, Ogiela MR. A system for detecting and describing pathologicalchanges using dynamic perfusion computer tomography brain maps. ComputBiol Med 2011;41(6):402-10.
5. d'Esterre CD, Aviv RI, Lee TY. The evolution of the cerebral blood volume abnor-mality in patients with ischemic stroke: a CT perfusion study. Acta Radiol2012;53(4):461-7.
6. Wintermark M, Meuli R, Browaeys P, et al. Comparison of CT perfusion andangiography and MRI in selecting stroke patients for acute treatment. Neurol-ogy 2007;68(9):694-7.
7. Schaefer PW, Roccatagliata L, Ledezma C, et al. First-pass quantitative CT per-fusion identifies thresholds for salvageable penumbra in acute stroke patientstreated with intra-arterial therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27(1):20-5.
8. Schramm P, Schellinger PD, Klotz E, et al. Comparison of perfusion com-puted tomography and computed tomography angiography source imageswith perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patientswith acute stroke of less than 6 hours' duration. Stroke 2004;35(7):1652-8.
9. Eastwood JD, Lev MH, Wintermark M, et al. Correlation of early dynamicCT perfusion imaging with whole-brain MR diffusion and perfusion imag-ing in acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24(9):1869-75.
10. Wintermark M, Flanders AE, Velthuis B, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment ofinfarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysisin 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37(4):979-85.
11. Schaefer PW, Barak ER, Kamalian S, et al. Quantitative assessment ofcore/penumbra mismatch in acute stroke: CT and MR perfusion imagingare strongly correlated when sufficient brain volume is imaged. Stroke2008;39(11): 2986-92.
12. Wintermark M, Maeder P, Thiran JP, Schnyder P, Meuli R. Quantitative assess-ment of regional cerebral blood flows by perfusion CT studies at low injectionrates: a critical review of the underlying theoretical models. Eur Radiol2001;11(7):1220-30.
13. Murphy BD, Fox AJ, Lee DH, et al. Identification of penumbra andinfarct in acute ischemic stroke using computed tomography perfusion-derived blood flow and blood volume measurements. Stroke 2006;37(7):1771-7.
14. Beyer T, Tellmann L, Nickel I, Pietrzyk U. On the use of positioning aids to reducemisregistration in the head and neck in whole-body PET/CT studies. J Nucl Med2005;46(4):596-602.
15. Green MV, Seidel J, Stein SD, et al. Head movement in normal subjects dur-ing simulated PET brain imaging with and without head restraint. J Nucl Med1994;35(9):1538-46.
16. Montgomery AJ, Thielemans K, Mehta MA, Turkheimer F, Mustafovic S, GrasbyPM. Correction of head movement on PET studies: comparison of methods. JNucl Med 2006;47(12):1936-44.
17. Bloomfield PM, Spinks TJ, Reed J, et al. The design and implementa-tion of a motion correction scheme for neurological PET. Phys Med Biol2003;48(8):959-78.
18. Sesay M, Jeannin A, Moonen CT, Dousset V, Maurette P. Pharmacological controlof head motion during cerebral blood flow imaging with CT or MRI. J Neurora-diol 2009;36(3):170-3.
19. Vu D, Lev MH. Noncontrast CT in acute stroke. Semin Ultrasound CT MR2005;26(6):380-6.
20. Muir KW, Baird-Gunning J, Walker L, Baird T, McCormick M, Coutts SB. Can theischemic penumbra be identified on noncontrast CT of acute stroke? Stroke2007;38(9):2485-90.
21. Klein S, Staring M, Murphy K, Viergever MA, Pluim JP. elastix: a toolboxfor intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2010;29(1):196-205.
22. Wagner A, Schicho K, Kainberger F, Birkfellner W, Grampp S, Ewers R. Quan-tification and clinical relevance of head motion during computed tomography.Invest Radiol 2003;38(11):733-41.
23. Herzog H, Tellmann L, Fulton R, et al. Motion artifact reduction on parametricPET images of neuroreceptor binding. J Nucl Med 2005;46(6):1059-65.
24. Murphy K, van Ginneken B, Reinhardt JM, et al. Evaluation of registrationmethods on thoracic CT: the EMPIRE10 challenge. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2011;30(11):1901-20.
25. Rueckert D, Sonoda LI, Hayes C, Hill DL, Leach MO, Hawkes DJ. Nonrigid reg-istration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEETrans Med Imaging 1999;18(8):712-21.