Contracting with companies

Contracting with Companies

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-321

  Griffiths, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890784440     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (80)

1. see P Davies, Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law 7th ed (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) ('Gower & Davies') at 3-10.
2. see R Harris, Industrializing English Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000)
3. P Davies, Gower's Principles of Modern Company Law (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1997) 6th edn ('Gower') at 18-48.
4. See also J Baskin and P Miranti, A History of Corporate Finance (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997).
5. See generally HLA Hart, 'Definition and Theory in Jurisprudence' (1954) 70 Law Quarterly Review 37.
6. See also R Grantham and C Rickett (eds), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998) ('Grantham & Rickett') at 8-10.
7. see M Horwitz, 'Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory' (1985) 88 West Virginia Law Rev 173
8. M Stokes, 'Company Law and Legal Theory' in W Twining (ed.), Legal Theory and Common Law (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986)
9. M Hale, The Prerogatives of the King (London, Seldon Society, 1976), vol 92, ch 19, cited in Harris at 18.
10. see HLA Hart, (1954) 70 Law Quarterly Review 37.
11. See also R Grantham, 'Commentary on Goddard' in Grantham & Rickett, above n 5.
12. see J Hill, 'Changes in the Role of the Shareholder' in R Grantham and C Rickett (eds), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998)
13. see P Davies, Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law, 7th edn (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) ('Gower & Davies') at 3-10.
14. See S Deakin and A Hughes, 'Economic Efficiency and the Proceduralisation of Company Law' [1999] Company Financial and Insolvency Law Review 169 ('Deakin & Hughes')
15. see A Ogus, Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994) ('Ogus') at 46-54.
16. See generally M Best, The New Competition: Institutions of Industrial Restructuring (Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990) ('Best').
17. See also W Bratton, 'The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History' (1989) 41 Stanford Law Review 1471
18. W Bratton, 'The Nexus of Contracts Corporation: A Critical Appraisal' (1989) 74 Cornell Law Review 407.
19. See S Littlechild, 'Three Types of Market Process' in Langlois (ed) ('Littlechild').
20. See also K Foss and N Foss, 'Economic Organization in a Process Perspective' in Krafft (ed) ('Foss & Foss').
21. See I MacNeil, 'Contracts: Adjustments of Long-Term Economic Relations Under Classical, Neoclassical and Relational Contract Law' (1978) 72 Northwestern University Law Review at 854
22. O Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York, The Free Press, 1985) ('Williamson (1985)').
23. See, for example, R Posner, 'The Rights of Creditors of Affiliated Corporations' (1976)
24. See G Akerlof, 'The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism' (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics 488.
25. See R Cooter and T Ulen, Law & Economics (London, Pearson Addison Wesley, 2004) 4th ed at 176-8.
26. See H Hansmann, 'Ownership of the Firm' (1988) 4 Journal of Law, Economics & Organisation 267.
27. See, for example, B Cheffins, Company Law: Theory, Structure and Operation (Oxford, OUP, 1997) ('Cheffins') at 54-8.
28. S Worthington, 'Corporate Governance: Remedying and Ratifying Directors' Breaches' (2000) 116 Law Quarterly Review 638.
29. V Finch, 'Directors' Duties Towards Creditors' (1989) 10 Company Lawyer 23
30. J. Lowry, 'The Recognition of Directors Owing Fiduciary Duties to Creditors' (2004) 1 International Corporate Rescue 59.
31. See R Goddard [2004] Journal of Business Law 121.
32. See generally E Ferran, Company Law & Corporate Finance (Oxford, OUP, 1999) ('Ferran') at 355-429.
33. Re Smith & Fawcett [1942] Ch 304 (CA); Charterbridge v Lloyds Bank [1970] Ch 62
34. Court of Session, Outer House in the Scottish case of Dawson International v Coats Paton [1989] BCLC 233.
35. Megarry J noted the 'deep waters' surrounding this point in Re Argentum Reductions (UK) [1975] 1 WLR 186 at 189.
36. See generally K Wedderburn, 'Shareholders' Rights and the Rule in Foss v Harbottle' [1957] CLJ 193 and [1958] CLJ 93 and Gower & Davies at 443-466.
37. See generally P Davies, Gower and Davies' Principles of Modern Company Law 7th ed (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) ('Gower & Davies') at 72-7.
38. J Gross, 'Pre-Incorporation Contracts' (1971) 87 Law Quarterly Review 367.
39. F Reynolds, 'Personal Liability of an Agent' (1969) 85 Law Quarterly Review 92 at 102-3.
40. See also the comments of Windeyer J on the 'ambiguities and limitations' of language in this context: (1966) 117 CLR 52 at 61.
41. See generally N Green, 'Security of Transaction after Phonogram' (1984) 47 Modern Law Review 671
42. See A Griffiths, 'Agents Without Principals' (1993) 13 Legal Studies 241 at 250-2.
43. See for example D Prentice (1973) 89 Law Quarterly Review 518 at 530-3.
44. See A Griffiths, 'Agents Without Principals' (1993) 13 Legal Studies 241 at 250-2.
45. P Birks, An Introduction to the Law of Restitution (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989) at 29-39.
46. See generally C Perkin, 'Corporate Beneficiaries and Privity of Contract' (2000) 21 Company Lawyer 277.
47. N Green, 'Security of Transaction after Phonogram' (1984) 47 Modern Law Review 671
48. Lord Nicholls, 'Knowing Receipt: The Need for a New Landmark' in W Cornish et al. (eds), Restitution: Past, Present & Future (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998).
49. See generally D Fox, 'Constructive Notice and Knowing Receipt: An Economic Analysis' [1998] Cambridge Law Journal 391.
50. See A Walters, 'Section 35A and Quorum Requirements: Confusion Reigns' (2002) 23 Company Lawyer 325
51. C Howell, 'Companies Act 1985, Sections 35A and 322A: Smith v Henniker-Major and the Proposed Reforms' (2003) 24 Company Lawyer 264.
52. Rimer J, at first instance in Smith v Henniker-Major [2002] BCC 544
53. See generally Lord Nicholls, 'Knowing Receipt: The Need for a New Landmark' in W Cornish et al (eds), Restitution: Past, Present & Future (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998).
54. See generally G Moffat, Trusts Law: Texts and Materials (London, Butterworths, 1999) at 556-561.
55. See generally D Fox, [1998] Cambridge Law Journal 391.
56. Lord Nicholls, however, remarked that the Court of Appeal in the Akindele case had fallen 'into error': [2004] UKHL 28 at 4.
57. see M Horwitz, 'Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory' (1985) 88 West Virginia Law Review 173
58. M Stokes, 'Company Law and Legal Theory' in W Twining (ed), Legal Theory and Common Law (Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986)
59. J Hill, Changes in the Role of the Shareholder in R Grantham and C Rickett (eds), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998).
60. See, for example, D Milman and AEvans, 'Corporate Officers and the Outsider Protection Regime' (1985) 6 Company Lawyer 68.
61. Morris v Kanssen [1946] AC 459 (HL); Howard v Patent Ivory (1888) 38 Ch D 156.
62. Howard v Patent Ivory (1888) 38 Ch D 156.
63. The House of Lords held that the rule could not be used to validate a 'forgery' in Ruben v Great Fingall Consolidated [1906] AC 439.
64. Kreditbank Cassel v Schenkers [1927] 1 KB 826 (CA); South London Greyhound Racecourses v Wake [1931] 1 Ch 496.
65. South London Greyhound Racecourses v Wake [1931] 1 Ch 496.
66. See The Law Commission, The Execution of Deeds and Documents by or on behalf of Bodies Corporate (Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 143, The Stationery Office, London, 1996 ('Execution of Deeds (CP)') at 529-532.
67. See I Brown, 'The Agent's Apparent Authority: Paradigm or Paradox?' [1995] Journal of Business Law 360.
68. See F Reynolds, 'The Ultimate Apparent Authority' (1994) 110 Law Quarterly Review 21.
69. See generally D Fox, 'Constructive Notice and Knowing Receipt: An Economic Analysis' [1998] Cambridge Law Journal 391.
70. See generally R Grantham and C Rickett (eds), Corporate Personality in the 20th Century (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1998) ('Grantham & Rickett').
71. See A Griffiths, 'Section 317 and Efficient Self-Dealing: What Should an Interested Director be required to Disclose?' [1999] Company Lawyer 184.
72. See S Deakin and A Hughes, 'Economic Efficiency and the Proceduralisation of Company Law' (1999) 3 Company Financial and Insolvency Law Review 169 at 175-6.
73. See S Deakin and A Hughes, (1999) 3 Company Financial and Insolvency Law Review 169 at 182.
74. See generally R Cooter and B Freedman, 'The Fiduciary Relationship: Its Economic Character and Legal Consequences' (1991) New York University Law Review 1045.
75. See generally W Bishop and D Prentice, 'Some Legal and Economic Aspects of Fiduciary Remuneration' (1983) 46 Modern Law Review 289.
76. See generally J Parkinson, Corporate Power and Responsibility (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1993), chapter 7.
77. See R Goddard, 'The Re Duomatic Principle and Sections 320-22 of the Companies Act 1985' [2004] Journal of Business Law 121.
78. West Mercia Safetywear v Dodd [1988] BCLC 250 (CA); Colin Gwyer v London Wharf [2002] EWHC 2748.
79. Colin Gwyer v London Wharf [2002] EWHC 2748.
80. See V Finch, 'Directors' Duties Towards Creditors' (1989) 10 Company Lawyer 23. See further chapter 3.