Health technology assessment in universal health coverage

The Lancet

Volumn 382, Issue 9910, 2013, Pages

  Chalkidou, Kalipso ^a   Marten, Robert ^b   Cutler, Derek ^a   Culyer, Tony ^c,d   Smith, Richard ^e   Teerawattananon, Yot ^f   Cluzeau, Francoise ^a   Li, Ryan ^a   Sullivan, Richard ^g   Huang, Yanzhong ^h   Fan, Victoria ⁱ   Glassman, Amanda ⁱ   Dezhi, Yu ^j   Gyansa Lutterodt, Martha ^k   McPherson, Sam ^l   Gadelha, Carlos ^m   Sundararaman, Thiagarajan ⁿ   Squires, Neil ^o   Daulaire, Nils ^p   Sadanandan, Rajeev ^q   Shiro, Konuma ^r   Lemgruber, Alexandre ^s   more..

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE   (United Kingdom)

^b ROCKEFELLER FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^f MINISTRY OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Thailand)

^g KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^h Council on Foreign Relations ^*  (United States)

ⁱ CENTER FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^j Ministry of Health and Local Health Bureau   (China)

^k MINISTRY OF HEALTH   (Ghana)

^l ITAD LTD   (United Kingdom)

^m MINISTÉRIO DA SAÚDE   (Brazil)

ⁿ National Rural Health Mission   (India)

^o Department of Health and Human Services ^*  (United Kingdom)

^p U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES   (United States)

^q GOVERNMENT OF INDIA   (India)

^r Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs   (Japan)

^s PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NOTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 84890773634     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62559-3     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. United Nations General Assembly (GA/11326). Adopting consensus text, General Assembly encourages member states to plan, pursue transition of national health care systems towards universal coverage. New York: United Nations, 2012.
2. Smith PC. Incorporating financial protection into decision rules for publicly financed healthcare treatments. Health Econ 2013; 22: 180-93.
3. Culyer AJ. The bogus conflict between efficiency and vertical equity. Health Econ 2006; 15: 1155-58.
4. Disease Control Priorities 3. 2013. http://www.dcp-3.org/about-project (accessed Nov 28, 2013).
5. University of York. PHRC Project on distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (2011-13). 2013. http://www.york.ac.uk/che/research/equity/d-c-e-a/ phrc/(accessed Nov 28, 2013).
6. Culyer AJ, Bombard Y. An equity framework for health technology assessments. Med Decis Making 2012; 32: 428-41.
7. Sassi F, Archard L, Le Grand J. Equity and the economic evaluation of healthcare. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5: 1-138.
8. WHO Collaborating Center for Knowledge Translation and Health Technology Assessment in Health Equity. Equity-oriented toolkit. http://www.cgh. uottawa.ca/WHOCC/projects/eo toolkit/(accessed Nov 28, 2013).
9. Glassman A, Chalkidou K . Priority setting institutions for global health Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development, 2012.
10. PAHO. Resolution on HTA and decision-making (Resolution CSP28.R9), approved by Member States in September 2012. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2012.
11. Parkhurst J. Support local governance to get research into policy. SciDevNet Sept 22, 2011. http://www.scidev.net/global/communication/opinion/ support-local-governance-to-get-research-into-policy-1.html (accessed Nov 28, 2013).