Individual-specific welfare measures for public goods: A latent class approach to residential customers of Yorkshire Water

Econometrics Informing Natural Resources Management: Selected Empirical Analyses

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 316-337

  Scarpa, Riccardo ^a   Willis, Kenneth G ^b   Acutt, Melinda ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Yorkshire Water   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890734681     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845424657.00023     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bhat, C. (1995), ‘A Heteroscedastic Extreme Value Model of Intercity Mode Choice’, Transportation Research B, 29, 471-83.
2. Bowman, A.W., and Azzalini, A. (1997), Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis: The Kernel Approach with S-Plus Illustrations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Boxall, P.C., and Adamowicz, V.L. (2002), ‘Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: The Use of Latent Class Analysis’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421-46.
4. Caussade, S., Juan de Dios, O., Rizzi, L.I., and Hensher, D.A. (2003), ‘Assessing the Influence of Design Dimensions on Stated Choice Experiment Estimates’, Manuscript, Department of Transport Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Casilla 306, Código 105, Santiago.
5. De Shazo, J.R., and Fermo, G. (2001), ‘Designing Choice Sets for Stated Preference Methods: The Effects of Complexity on Choice Consistency’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, 123-43.
6. Greene, W.H. (2002), Nlogit v. 3, Reference guide, Econometric Software Inc.
7. Heckman, J.B., and Singer, F. (1984), ‘Econometric Duration Analysis’, Journal of Econometrics, 24, 63-132.
8. Leroux, B.G. (1992), ‘Consistent Estimation of Mixing Distribution’, Annal of Statistics, 20, 1350-60.
9. McFadden, D., and Train, K. (2000), ‘Mixed MNL Models of Discrete Response’, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15, 447-70.
10. McLachlan, G., and Peel, D. (2000), Finite Mixture Models, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11. Pollack, R.A., and Wales, T.J. (1992), Demand System Specification and Estimation, New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Provencher, B., Barenklau, K., and Bishop, R.C. (2002), ‘A Finite Mixture Logit Model of Recreational Angling with Serially Correlated Random Utility’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, November, 1066-75.
13. Scarpa, R., Drucker, A., Anderson, S., Ferraes-Ehuan, N., Gomez, V., Risopatron, C.R., and Rubio-Leonel, O. (2003a), ‘Valuing Animal Genetic Resources in Peasant Economies: The Case of the BoxKeken Creole Pig inYucatan’, Ecological Economics, 45(3), 427-43.
14. Scarpa, R., Spalatro, F., and Canavari, M. (2003b), ‘Investigating Preferences for Environment Friendly Production Practices’, Eighth Joint Conference on Food, Agriculture and the Environment, Red Cedar Lake, Wisconsin, 25-8August 2002, AgEcon SearchWorking Paper 03-3, available at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/.
15. Scarpa, R., Philippidis, G., and Spalatro, F. (2001), ‘Product-Country Images and Preference Heterogeneity for Mediterranean Food Products: A Random Utility Analysis’. Paper presented at the 75th conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, Harper Adams College, Newport, UK, 12 September 2001.
16. Scarpa, R., and Willis, K. (2002), ‘Monte Carlo Experiments to Simulate Effectiveness of Experimental Designs in Residential SP Survey’, Report to Yorkshire Water.
17. Shonkwiler, J.S., and Shaw, W.D. (2003), ‘A Finite Mixture Approach to Analyzing Income Effects in Random Utility Models: Reservoir Recreation along the Columbia River’, chapter 13 in The New Economics of Outdoor Recreation, Edited by N. Hanley, D. Shaw and R. Wright (eds), Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 242-68.
18. Swait, J. (1994), ‘A Structural Equation Model of Latent Segmentation and Product Choice for Cross-sectional Revealed Preference Choice Data’, Journal of Retail and Consumer Services, 1(2), 77-89.
19. Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Train, K., and Sonnier, G. (2003), ‘Mixed Logit with Bounded Distribution of Part-worths’, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.
21. Willis, K., and Scarpa, R. (2002), ‘Yorkshire Water Customers’ Utility & Willingness-To-Pay For Changes In Water Service Factor Levels: A Stated Choice Analysis’, Report to Yorkshire Water.