Provider imposed restrictions to clients' access to family planning in urban Uttar Pradesh, India: A mixed methods study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Calhoun, Lisa M ^a   Speizer, Ilene S ^a,b   Rimal, Rajiv ^c   Sripad, Pooja ^d   Chatterjee, Nilesh ^d   Achyut, Pranita ^e   Nanda, Priya ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e International Center for Research on Women   (India)

Author keywords

Eligibility barriers; Family planning; India; Provider barriers; Urban; Uttar Pradesh

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INDIA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVIEW; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STATISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INDIA; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; PARITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890692464     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-532     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Access, quality of care and medical barriers in family planning programs. Bertrand JT, Hardee K, Magnani RJ, Angle MA, Int Fam Plan Perspect 1995 21 2 64 69 74 10.2307/2133525
2. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Shelton J, Angle M, Jacobstein R, Lancet 1992 340 8831 1334 1335 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92505-A 1360046
3. Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Bruce J, Stud Fam Plann 1990 21 2 61 91 10.2307/1966669 2191476
4. Do service providers in Tanzania unnecessarily restrict clients' access to contraceptive methods? Speizer IS, Hotchkiss DR, Magnani RJ, Hubbard B, Nelson K, Int Fam Plan Perspect 2000 26 1 13 20 42 10.2307/2648285
5. Why do family planning providers restrict access to services? An examination in Ghana. Stanback J, Twum-Baah KA, Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001 27 1 37 41 10.2307/2673804 (Pubitemid 33721261)
6. Ruling out pregnancy among family planning clients: the impact of a checklist in three countries. Stanback J, Diabete F, Dieng T, Duarte de Morales T, Cummings S, Traore M, Stud Fam Plann 2005 36 4 311 315 10.1111/j.1728-4465. 2005.00073.x 16395948 (Pubitemid 44883491)
7. Medical barriers often unnecessary. Best K, Network: Improving Reproductive Health Services. Volume 21, Number 3 FHI 360: Research Triangle Park, NC 2002
8. The provider perspective: human after all. Shelton J, Int Fam Plan Perspect 2001 27 3 152 153 161 10.2307/2673838
9. Medical barriers to contraceptive use. Cottingham J, Mehta S, Reprod Health Matters 1993 1 1 97 100 10.1016/0968-8080(93)90068-5
10. Variations in doctor effort: evidence from Paraguay. Das J, Sohnesen TP, Health Aff 2007 26 3 324 w337 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w324
11. Clinic-based family planning and reproductive health services in Africa: findings from situation analysis studies. Hansen PM, Peters DH, Edward A, Gupta S, Arur A, Niayesh H, Burnham G, Int J Qual Health Care 1998 20 6 375 383
12. Clinic-Based Family Planning and Reproductive Health Services in Africa: Findings from Situation Analysis Studies New York: Population Council, Miller K, Miller R, Askew I, Horn MC, Ndhlovu L, 1998
13. Senderowitz J, FOCUS on Young Adults: Making Reproductive Health Services Youth Friendly Washington, DC: Pathfinder International 1999
14. Adolescents access to reproductive health and family planning services in Dakar (Senegal). Nare C, Katz K, Tolley E, Afr J Reprod Health 1997 1 2 15 25 10.2307/3583373 10214411
15. What went wrong with public health in India. Deodhar NS, J Health Popul Dev Ctries 2000 3 1 91 98
16. Determinants of family planning availability misperceptions: perceived versus objective availability of reversible contraception in rural India. Fowler C, PhD thesis University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Department of Health Policy and Administration 2001
17. Barriers to effective family planning in Nepal. Schuler SR, McIntosh EN, Goldstein MC, Pande BR, Stud Fam Plann 1985 16 5 260 270 10.2307/1966999 4060211
18. Revitalizing rural health care delivery: can rural health practitioners be the answer? Yadav K, Jarhyan P, Gupta V, Pandav CS, Indian J Community Med 2009 34 1 3 5 10.4103/0970-0218.45368 19876447
19. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International, National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India: Volume I Mumbai, India: IIPS 2007
20. National Urban Health Mission (2008-2012), Urban Health Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India 2008 Webpage: http://www.uhrc.in/downloads/Reports/NUHM-Draft.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2012
21. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner (India), Provisional Population Totals-Uttar Pradesh: Rural-urban distribution http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/prov-data-products-up.html. Accessed March 7, 2012
22. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Government of India), State of Urban Health in Uttar Pradesh http://uhrc.in/module-ContentExpress-display-ceid- 84.html. Accessed January 2, 2011
23. Nanda P, Achyut P, Mishra A, Calhoun L, Measurement, Learning and Evaluation of the Urban Health Initiative: Uttar Pradesh, India, Baseline Survey 2010 [TWP-3-2011] Chapel Hill, NC: Measurement, Learning & Evaluation Project 2011
24. Family planning use among urban poor women from six cities of Uttar Pradesh, India. Speizer IS, Nanda P, Achyut P, Pillai G, Guilkey D, J Urban Health 2012 89 4 639 658 10.1007/s11524-011-9667-1 22399250
25. Division of Research Studies and Standards, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, Standards for Female and Male Sterilization Services Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi: Government of India 2006
26. Family Planning Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, IUCD Reference Manual for Medical Officers Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi: Government of India 2007
27. Family Planning Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, IUCD Reference Manual for Nursing Personnel Nirman Bhawan, New Delh: Government of India 2007
28. Levy T, Agarwal D, Miller P, Expanding Access and Demand for DMPA in Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, and Uttarakhand Washington: U.S. Agency for International Development 2009 http://www.ghtechproject.com/files/ DMPA%20Evaluation%20Report-final%20edformat508-Sept%2009.pdf Accessed on October 25, 2013
29. World Health Organization, Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, fourth edition, 2009 Geneva, Switzerland: WHO 2010 http://whqlibdoc.who. int/publications/2010/9789241563888-eng.pdf
30. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: National Rural Health Mission, List of Drugs being provided in ASHA Kit Accessed on October 25, 2013. Available at: http://nrhm.gov.in/communitisation/asha/list-of- drugs-being-provided-in-asha-kit.html
31. Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Campbell M, Sahin-Hodoglugil NN, Potts M, Stud Fam Plann 2006 37 2 87 98 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2006.00088.x 16832983 (Pubitemid 43905632)
32. Putting unmet need to the test: community-based distribution of family planning in Pakistan. Shelton JD, Bradshaw L, Hussein B, Zubair Z, Drexler T, McKenna MR, Int Fam Plan Perspect 1999 25 4 191 195 10.2307/2991884
33. On kinship structure, female autonomy and demographic behavior in India. Dyson T, Moore M, Popul Dev Rev 1983 9 1 35 60 10.2307/1972894
34. Political will and family planning: The implications of India's emergency experience. Gwatkin DR, Popul Dev Rev 1979 5 1 29 59 10.2307/1972317
35. Use of a spacing method before sterilization among couples in Kerala, India. Zavier F, Padmadas SS, Int Fam Plan Perspect 2000 26 1 29 35 10.2307/2648287