Mismatch of structural and functional tonotopy for natural sounds in the auditory midbrain

Neuroscience

Volumn 258, Issue , 2014, Pages 192-203

  Portfors, C V ^a   Roberts, P D ^b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distortion products; Frequency tuning; Inferior colliculus; Mouse; Spatial organization; Vocalizations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TONOTOPY; TUNING CURVE; VOCALIZATION;

CF; CHARACTERISTIC FREQUENCY; DISTORTION PRODUCTS; FREQUENCY TUNING; IC; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; MINIMAL THRESHOLD; MOUSE; MT; NMSE; NORMALIZED MEAN SQUARE ERROR; POST-STIMULUS TIME HISTOGRAMS; PSTHS; SELECTIVITY INDEX VALUE; SI; SPATIAL ORGANIZATION; VOCALIZATIONS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HEARING; INFERIOR COLLICULI; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; ULTRASONICS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84890672611     PISSN: 03064522     EISSN: 18737544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Clopton B., Winfield J. Tonotopic organization in the inferior colliculus of the rat. Brain Res 1973, 56:355-358.
2. Goldstein J., Kiang N. Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f1-f2. Proc IEEE 1968, 56(6):981-992.
3. Holmstrom L., Roberts P.D., Portfors C.V. Responses to social vocalizations in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat are influenced by secondary tuning curves. J Neurophysiol 2007, 47:461-481.
4. Holmstrom L., Eeuwes L., Roberts P., Portfors C. Efficient encoding of vocalizations in the auditory midbrain. J Neurosci 2010, 30(3):802-819.
5. Holy T.E., Guo Z. Ultrasonic songs of male mice. PLoS Biol 2005, 3(12):e386.
6. Kim D.O., Molnar C.E., Matthews J.W. Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. J Acoust Soc Am 1980, 67:1704-1721.
7. Klug A., Bauer E.E., Hanson J.T., Hurley L., Meitzen J., Pollak G.D. Response selectivity for species-specific calls in the inferior colliculus of Mexican free-tailed bats is generated by inhibition. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:1941-1954.
8. Liu R.C., Schreiner C.E. Auditory cortical detection and discrimination correlates with communicative significance. PLoS Biol 2007, 5(7):e173.
9. Lukashkin A., Russell I. A descriptive model of the receptor potential nonlinearities generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 103:973-980.
10. 2 distortion components generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer: dependence on the amplitudes of the primaries and feedback gain. J Acoust Soc Am 1999, 106:2661-2668.
11. Mahrt E.J., Perkel D.J., Tong L., Rubel E.W., Portfors C.V. Engineered deafness reveals that mouse courtship vocalizations are innate. J Neurosci 2013, 33:5573-5583.
12. Malmierca M., Izquierdo M., Cristaudo S., Hernandez O., Perez-Gonzalez D., Covey E., Oliver D. A discontinuous tonotopic organization in the inferior colliculus of the rat. J Neurosci 2008, 28(18):4767-4776.
13. Mayko Z.M., Roberts P.D., Portfors C.V. Inhibitory microcircuitry shapes selectivity to vocalizations in the inferior colliculus. Front Neurosci 2012, 6:73.
14. Merzenich M., Reid M. Representation of the cochlea within the inferior colliculus of the cat. Brain Res 1974, 77(3):397-415.
15. Muniak M.M., Mayko Z.M., Ryugo D.K., Portfors C.V. Preparation of an awake mouse for recording neural responses and injecting tracers. J Vis Exp 2012, 64:e3755.
16. Nuttall A.L., Dolan D.F. Inner hair cell responses to the 2f1-f2 intermodulation distortion product. J Acoust Soc Am 1990, 87:782-790.
17. Oliver D. Dorsal cochlear nucleus projections to the inferior colliculus in the cat: a light and electron microscopic study. J Comp Neurol 1984, 224(2):155-172.
18. Paxinos G., Franklin K. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates 2001, Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 2nd ed.
19. Plomp R. Detectability threshold for combination tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1965, 37:1110-1123.
20. Portfors C.V. Combination sensitivity and processing of communication calls in the inferior colliculus of the mustached bat Pteronotus parnellii. An Acad Bras Cienc 2004, 76:253-257.
21. Portfors C.V. Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice. J Am Assoc Lab Animal Sci 2007, 46(1):28-34.
22. Portfors C., Felix R. Spectral integration in the inferior colliculus of the CBA/CaJ mouse. Neuroscience 2005, 136(4):1159-1170.
23. Portfors C., Roberts P., Jonson K. Over-representation of species-specific vocalizations in the awake mouse inferior colliculus. Neuroscience 2009, 162(2):486-500.
24. Portfors C.V., Mayko Z.M.K., Cha G.F., Roberts P.D. Spatial organization of receptive fields in the auditory midbrain of awake mouse. Neuroscience 2011, 193:429-439.
25. Robles L., Ruggero M., Nola R. Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea. Nature 1991, 349:413-414.
26. Stiebler I., Ehret G. Inferior colliculus of the house mouse. I. A quantitative study of tonotopic organization, frequency representation, and tone-threshold distribution. J Comput Neurosci 1985, 238:65-76.
27. Verpy E., Weil D., Leibovici M., Goodyear R., Hamard G., Houdon C., Lefevre G., Hardelin J.P., Richardson G.P., Avan P., Petit C. Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions. Nature 2008, 456:255-259.
28. Warren B., Gibson G., Russell I.J. Sex recognition through midflight mating duets in Culex mosquitoes is mediated by acoustic distortion. Curr Biol 2009, 19(6):485-491.
29. Willott J.F. Effects of aging, hearing loss, and anatomical location on thresholds of inferior colliculus neurons in C57Bl/6 and CBA mice. J Neurophysiol 1986, 56:391-408.
30. Willott J.F. Central physiological correlates of aging and presbycusis in mice. Acta Otolaryngol 1991, 476:153-156.
31. Woolley S.M.N., Portfors C.V. Conserved mechanisms of vocalization coding in mammalian and songbird auditory midbrain. Hearing Res 2013, 305:45-56.
32. Xie R., Meitzen J., Pollak G.D. Differing roles of inhibition in hierarchical processing of species-specific calls in auditory brainstem nuclei. J Neurophysiol 2005, 94(6):4019-4037.