Risk-based design of safety measures to prevent and mitigate dust explosion hazards

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 52, Issue 50, 2013, Pages 18095-18108

  Yuan, Zhi ^a   Khakzad, Nima ^a   Khan, Faisal ^a   Amyotte, Paul ^b   Reniers, Genserik ^c  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; BOW-TIE ANALYSIS; COMPLEX FACTORS; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY; INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK-BASED DESIGN;

ACCIDENTS; CIVIL DEFENSE; HEALTH RISKS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

EXPLOSIONS;

EID: 84890663880     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie4018989     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. CSB. Combustible Dust Hazard Study; Investigation Report for dust accidents in the U.S.; Washington, DC, 2006.
2. CSB. Aluminum Dust Explosion-Hayes Lemmerz International-Huntington, Inc.; Investigation Report for Hayes Lemmerz International Huntington; Washington, DC, 2005.
3. CSB. Dust Explosion-West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.; Investigation Report for West Pharmaceutical Services; Washington, DC, 2004.
4. Blair, A. S. Dust explosion incidents and regulation in the United States J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2007, 20, 523-529
5. Zheng, Y. P.; Feng, Ch. G.; Jing, G. X. A statistical analysis of coal mine accidents caused by coal dust explosions in China J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2009, 22, 528-532
6. Giby, J.; Luca, M. Case study of a nylon fibre explosion: An example of explosion risk in a textile plant J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2010, 23, 106-111
7. Marmo, L.; Cavallero, D.; Debernardi, M. L. Aluminium dust explosion risk analysis in metal workings J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2004, 17, 449-465
8. Piccinini, N. Dust explosion in a wool factory: Origin, dynamics and consequences Fire Saf. J. 2008, 43, 189-204
9. John, B.; Vorderbrueggen, P. E. Imperial sugar refinery combustible dust explosion investigation Process Saf. Prog. 2011, 30, 66-80
10. Eckhoff, R. K. Dust Explosions in the Process Industries, 3 rd ed.; Elsevier Science: Burlington, MA, 2003.
11. Eckhoff, R. K. Understanding dust explosions. The role of powder science and technology J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2009, 22, 105-116
12. Callé, S.; Klaba, L.; Thomas, D.; Perrin, L.; Dufaud, O. Influence of the size distribution and concentration on wood dust explosion: Experiments and reaction model Powder Technol. 2005, 157, 144-148
13. Amyotte, P. R.; Basu, A.; Khan, F. I. Dust explosion hazard of pulverized fuel carry-over J. Hazard. Mater. 2005, 122, 23-30
14. Cashdollar, K. L.; Zlochower, I. A. Explosion temperatures and pressures of metal and other elemental dust clouds J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2007, 20, 337-348
15. Pilão, R.; Ramalho, E.; Pinho, C. Overall characterization of cork dust explosion J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 133, 183-195
16. Benedetto, A. Di.; Russo, P.; Amyotte, P.; Marchand, N. Modelling the effect of particle size on dust explosions Chem. Eng. Sci. 2010, 65, 772-779
17. Li, G.; Yuan, C. M.; Fu, Y.; Zhong, Y. P.; Chen, B. Z. Inerting of magnesium dust cloud with Ar, N2 and CO2 J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170, 180-183
18. Myers, T. J. Reducing aluminum dust explosion hazards: Case study of dust in an aluminum buffing operation J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 159, 72-80
19. Marian, G.; Rudolf, K. Effectiveness of an active dust and gas explosion suppression system J. Powder Technol. 2012, 92, 1-11
20. Amyotte, P. R.; Pegg, M. J.; Khan, F. I.; Nifuku, M.; Tan, Y. X. Moderation of dust explosions J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2007, 20, 675-687
21. Amyotte, P. R.; Pegg, M. J.; Khan, F. I. Application of inherent safety principles to dust explosion prevention and mitigation Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2009, 87, 35-39
22. van dert Voort, M. M.; Klein, A. J. J.; de Maaijer, M.; van den Berg, A. C.; van Deursen, J. R. A quantitative risk assessment tool for the external safety of industrial plants with a dust explosion hazard J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2007, 20, 375-386
23. Dianous, V.; Fiévez, C. ARAMIS project: A more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 130, 220-233
24. Shahriar, A.; Sadiq, R.; Tesfamariam, S. Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2011, 25, 505-523
25. Khakzad, N.; Khan, F.; Amyotte, P. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 104, 36-44
26. Bellamy, L. J.; Mud, M.; Manuel, H. J.; Oh, J. Analysis of underlying causes of investigated loss of containment incidents in Dutch Seveso plants using the Storybuilder method. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2013, In press
27. Paltrinieri, N.; Tugnoli, A.; Buston, J.; Wardman, M.; Cozzani, V. Dynamic procedure for atypical scenaros identification (DyPASI): A new systematic HAZID tool J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2013, 26, 683-695
28. Khakzad, N.; Khan, F.; Amyotte, P. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2013, 91, 46-53
29. Khakzad, N.; Khan, F.; Amyotte, P. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96, 925-932
30. Khan, F.; Amyotte, P. How to make inherent safety practice a reality Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2003, 81, 2-16
31. Kletz, T. A. What you don't have, can't leak Chem. Ind. 1978, 287-292
32. Kletz, T. A. Inherently safer design-Its scope and future Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2003, 81, 401-405
33. Abuswer, M.; Amyotte, P.; Khan, F. A quantitative risk management frame work for dust and hybrid mixture explosions J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2013, 26, 283-289
34. OREDA. Offshore Reliability Data Handbook; SINTEF Industrial Management: Norway, 2002.
35. Mannan, S. Lees'Loss Prevention in the Process Industries; Elsevier Science: Burlington, MA, 2005; Vol. 3.
36. Moss, T. R. The Reliability Data Handbook; Professional Engineering Publishing Limited: 2005.
37. Rathnayaka, S.; Khan, F. I.; Amyotte, P. R. SHIPP methodology: Predictive accident modeling approach. Part I: Methodology and model description Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2011, 89, 151-164
38. Khakzad, N.; Khan, F.; Amyotte, P.; Cozzani, V. Domino effect analysis using Bayesian networks Risk Anal. 2013, 33 (2) 292-306
39. Khakzad, N.; Khan, F.; Amyotte, P.; Cozzani, V. Risk management of domino effects considering dynamic consequence analysis. Risk Anal. 2013, accepted
40. European Commission Joint Research Centre. ARAMIS-Accidental Risk Assessment Methodology for Industries in the framework of SEVESO II directive. http://mahb.jrc.it/index.php?id=447 (accessed Oct. 17, 2013)
41. Kletz, T. A.; Amyotte, P. R. Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherently Safer Design, 2 nd ed.; CRC Press: 2010.