Freight shipment modal split and its environmental impacts: An exploratory study

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 2-12

  Hwang, Taesung ^a   Ouyang, Yanfeng ^a  

^a University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; COMPETITION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASES; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SHIPS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRUCKS;

ATMOSPHERIC IMPACT; ENGINEERING FACTORS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; EXPLORATORY STUDIES; FREIGHT MODAL CHOICE; GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION; MARKET SHARE MODEL;

FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORT;

AIR POLLUTION; COMMERCE; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TRANSPORTATION; VEHICLE EMISSIONS;

EID: 84890642610     PISSN: 10962247     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.831799     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abdelwahab, W.M. and Sargious, M.A. A. 1991. Simultaneous Decision-Making Approach to Model the Demand for Freight Transportation. Can. J. Civ. Eng, 18 (3): 515 - 520. doi: 10.1139/l91-062
2. Allen, W.B. 1977. The Demand for Freight Transportation: A Micro Approach. Transport. Res., 11 (1): 9 - 14. doi: 10.1016/0041-1647(77)90061-2
3. Arunotayanun, K. and Polak, J.W. 2011. Taste Heterogeneity and Market Segmentation in Freight Shippers' Mode Choice Behaviour. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev, 47 (2): 138 - 148. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2010.09.003
4. Association of American Railroads. Railroad Fuel Efficiency Sets New Record. News Release, Association of American Railroads: Washington, DC, May 21, 2008 http://old.aar.org/NewsAndEvents/Press-Releases/2008/05/RailroadFuelRecord.aspx.
5. Bickford, E. 2012. Emissions and Air Quality Impacts of Freight Transportation; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
6. Bryan, J., Weisbrod, G.E. and Martland, C.D. 2007. NCHRP Report 586: Rail Freight Solutions to Roadway Congestion-Final Report and Guidebook, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
7. Cambridge, Systematics. Cambridge, MA, 2002. Inc. Draft Technical Memorandum: Model Specification Task 3
8. Catalani, M. A. July 22-27 2001. Model of Shipper Behaviour Choice in a Domestic Freight Transport System. Paper presented at the 9th World Conference on Transport Research, July 22-27, Seoul, Korea.
9. Chin, S.M.; Hopson, J.; Hwang, H.L. Estimating State-Level Truck Activities in America. J. Transport. Stat. 1998, 1(1), 63-74 http://ntl.bts.gov/data/letter_am/chin.pdf.
10. Cohen, H., Horowitz, A. and Pendyala, R. 2008. NCHRP Report 606: Forecasting Statewide Freight Toolkit; Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Washington, DC
11. Comer, B., Corbett, J.J., Hawker, J.S., Korfmacher, K., Lee, E.E., Prokop, C. and Winebrake, J.J. 2010. Marine Vessels as Substitutes for Heavy-Duty Trucks in Great Lakes Freight Transportation. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc, 60 (7): 884 - 890. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.884
12. Daugherty, A.F. 1979. Freight Transport Demand Revisited: A Microeconomic View of Multimodal, Multi-Characteristic Service Uncertainty and the Demand for Freight Transport. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 13 (4): 281 - 288. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(79)90020-1
13. Economagic, LLC. Economagic.com: Economic Time Series Page [Online]. 1996 http://www.economagic.com/.
14. Faraway, J.J. Boca Raton, FL, 2006. Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models, Chapman & Hall/CRC.
15. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) [Online]. 2011 http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/.
16. Golias, J. and Yannis, G. 1998. Determinants of Combined Transport's Market Share. Transport Logist, 1 (4): 251 - 264.
17. Gray, R. and Behavioural. 1982. Approaches to Freight Transport Modal Choice. Transport Rev, 2 (2): 161 - 184. doi: 10.1080/01441648208716491
18. Gruca, T.S.; Sudharshan, D. Equilibrium Characteristics of Multinomial Logit Market Share Models. J. Market. Res. 1991, 28(4), 480-482 doi 10.2307/3172788 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3172788.
19. Ham, H., Kim, T.J. and Boyce, D. 2002. Economic Impacts of Transportation Network Changes: Implementation of a Combined Transportation Network and Input-Output Model. Paper. Reg. Sci, 81 (2): 223 - 246. doi: 10.1007/s101100100101
20. Ham, H., Kim, T.J. and Boyce, D. 2005. Implementation and Estimation of a Combined Model of Interregional, Multimodal Commodity Shipments and Transportation Network Flows. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39 (1): 65 - 79. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2004.02.005
21. Holguín-Veras, J., Revealed and Preference. 2002. Analysis of Commercial Vehicle Choice Process. J. Transport. Eng, 128 (4): 336 - 346. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:4(336
22. ICF Consulting. Washington, DC, 2005. Assessing the Effects of Freight Movement on Air Quality at the National and Regional Level, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
23. Isard, W. Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of a Space-Economy. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1951, 33(4), 318-328 doi:10.2307/1926459 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1926459.
24. Isard, W. MA, 1960. Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science, Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. Jiang, F.; Johnson, P.; Calzada, C. Freight Demand Characteristics and Mode Choice: An Analysis of the Results of Modeling with Disaggregate Revealed Preference Data. J. Transport. Stat. 1999, 2(2), 149-158 http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/7000/7600/7600/4jiang.pdf.
26. Kim, T.J., Boyce, D.E. and Hewings, G.J.D. 1983. Combined Input-Output and Commodity Flow Models for Interregional Development Planning: Insights from a Korean Application. Geogr. Anal., 15 (4): 330 - 342. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1983.tb00791.x
27. Leontief, W. and Strout, A. 1963. " Multiregional Input-Output Analysis ". In Structural Interdependence and Economic Development Edited by: Barna, T. 119 - 150. Macmillan: London
28. Menard, S. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001.
29. Moses, L.N. The Stability of Interregional Trading Patterns and Input-Output Analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 1955, 45(5), 803-826 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1821380.
30. Nam, K.C. A. 1997. Study on the Estimation and Aggregation of Disaggregate Models of Mode Choice for Freight Transport. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev, 33 (3): 223 - 231. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(97)00011-2
31. Natural Resources Defense Council. Clean By Design: Transportation [Online]. 2012 http://www.nrdc.org/international/cleanbydesign/transportation.asp.
32. Nourbakhsh, S.M. and Ouyang, Y. 2010. Optimal Fueling Strategies for Locomotive Fleets in Railroad Networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44 (8-9): 1104 - 1114. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2010.03.003
33. Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L. 1998. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
34. Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) [Online]. 2011 http://www.bts.gov/publications/commodity flow_survey/.
35. Rho, J.H., Boyce, D.E. and Kim, T.J. 1989. Comparison of Solution Methods for Wilson's Interregional Commodity Flow Model. Geogr. Anal, 21 (3): 259 - 267. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1989.tb00893.x
36. Shinghal, N. and Freight Mode, Fowkes, A. 2002. Choice and Adaptive Stated Preferences. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev, 38 (5): 367 - 378. doi: 10.1016/S1366-5545(02)00012-1
37. Transportation, Economics, and, Management and Systems. 2008. Impact of High Oil Prices on Freight Transportation: Modal Shift Potential in Five Corridors; Technical Report; Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation: Washington, DC,
38. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI Inflation Calculator [Online]. 2013 http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm.
39. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2008. Diesel Fuel Prices: What Consumers Should Know U.S. Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC
40. " U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ". In Climate Leaders Greenhouse Gas Inventory Protocol Module Guidance, Optimal Emissions from Commuting, Business Travel and Product Transport U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC 2008
41. Wikipedia Contributors. Benchmark (Crude Oil). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 2012 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark_(crude_oil).
42. Wilson, A.G. London, 1970a. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modeling; Pion Ltd.:
43. Wilson, A.G. 1970b. Inter-Regional Commodity Flows: Entropy Maximizing Approaches. Geogr. Anal., 2 (3): 255 - 282. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1970.tb00859.x
44. Windisch, E., de Jong, G.C., van Nes, R. and Hoogendoorn, S.P. A. October 11-13, 2010. " Disaggregate Freight Transport Model of Transport Chain and Shipment Size Choice ". In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference Glasgow, Scotland, UK
45. Winebrake, J.J., Corbett, J.J., Falzarano, A., Hawker, J.S., Korfmacher, K., Ketha, S. and Zilora, S. 2008. Assessing Energy Environmental, and Economic Tradeoffs in Intermodal Freight Transportation. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc, 58 (8): 1004 - 1013. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.58.8.1004
46. Winston, C. A Disaggregate Model of the Demand for Intercity Freight Transportation. Econometrica 1981, 49(4), 981-1006 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912514.
47. Winston, C. 1983. The Demand for Freight Transportation: Models and Applications. Transport. Res. Gen, 17 (6): 419 - 427. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(83)90162-0