Engagement and the carnegie classification system

Handbook of Engaged Scholarship

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 161-176

  Giles Jr , Dwight E ^a   Sandmann, Lorilee R ^b   Saltmarsh, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890621161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professorate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
2. Boyer, E. (1996, Spring). The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service & Outreach, 1(1), 11-20.
3. Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Helland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29, No. 2.
4. Campus Compact. (2008). Civic engagement initiatives. Providence, RI: Brown University. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from http://www.compact.org/ initiatives/civic-engagement/.
5. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (CFAT). (2007). Elective classifi cation: community engagement-2008 documentation framework (Revised 10/23/2007). Stanford, CA: Author. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/dynamic/downloads/file-1-614.pdf.
6. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (CFAT). (2008). Community engagement. Stanford, CA: Author. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications/index.asp?key=1213.
7. Clark, T. N. (1971). Institutionalization of innovations in higher education: Four models. In J. V. Baldridge (Ed.), Academic governance: Research on institutional politics and decision making (pp. 75-96). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
8. Driscoll, A. (2008, January/February). Carnegie's community-engagement classifi cation: Intentions and insights. Change, 38-41.
9. Driscoll, A., & Lynton, E. (1999). Making outreach visible: A guide to documenting professional service and outreach. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
10. Eckel, P., Hill, B., & Green, M. (1998). On change: En route to transformation. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
11. Ellison, J., & Eatman, T. K. (2008). Scholarship in public: Knowledge creation and tenure policy in the engaged university: A resource on promotion and tenure in the arts, humanities, and design. Imagining America: Artists and Scholars in Public Life Tenure Team Initiative on Public Scholarship. Retrieved February 22, 2010, from http://www.imaginingamerica.org/TTI/TTI-FINAL.pdf.
12. Furco, A. (2002). Institutionalizing service-learning in higher education [Supplemental Issue I: Civic Engagement and Higher Education]. Journal of Public Affairs, 6, 39-67.
13. Giles, D. E. Jr. (2008). Understanding an emerging fi eld of scholarship: Toward a research agenda for engaged public scholarship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(2), 97-108.
14. Giles, D. E. Jr., Saltmarsh, J., Ward, E., & Buglione, S. (2008, November). An analysis of faculty reward policies for engaged scholarship at Carnegie classified community engaged institutions. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Higher Education Conference, Jacksonville, FL.
15. Lynton, E. (1995). Making the case for professional service. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
16. McCormick, A., & Zhao, C. M. (2005, September/October). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie classifi cation. Change, 51-57.
17. O'Meara, K. A. (2000). Service-learning, scholarship, and the reward system. In J.S. Greenberg (Ed.), Service-learning in health education (pp. 138-149). Reston, VA: American Association for Health Education.
18. O'Meara, K. A. (2002, Summer). Uncovering the values in faculty evaluation of service as scholarship. Review of Higher Education, 57-80.
19. O'Meara, K. A. (2003). Reframing incentives and rewards for community service-learning and academic outreach. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 8(2), 201-220.
20. O'Meara, K. A., & Rice, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). Faculty priorities reconsidered: Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Saltmarsh, J., Giles, D. E. Jr., Ward, E., & Buglione, S. M. (2009). Rewarding community-engaged scholarship. In L. R. Sandmann, C. H. Thornton, & A. J. Jaeger (eds.). Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: The fi rst wave of Carnegie classified institutions. New Directions for Higher Education. Indianapolis, In: Wiley Publishing.
22. Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Conceptualization of the scholarship of engagement in higher education: A strategic review, 1996-2006. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), 91-104.
23. Sandmann, L. R., Thornton, C. H., & Jaeger, A. J. (Eds.). (2009). Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: The fi rst wave of Carnegie classifi ed institutions. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 147. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
24. Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29, No. 5.
25. Ward, K. (2005). Rethinking faculty roles and rewards for the public good. In A. J. Kezar, T. C. Chambers, J. C. Burkhardt, & Associates (eds.), Higher education and the public good: Emerging voices form a national movement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26. Weerts, D. J., & Sandmann, L. R. (2008). Building a two-way street: Challenges and opportunities for community engagement at research universities. Review of Higher Education, 32(1), 73-106.