Academics perception towards various water reuse options: University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto-Douro - UTAD Campus (Portugal) as a case study

Urban Water Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 311-322

  Matos, Cristina ^a   Friedler, Eran ^b   Monteiro, Ana ^a   Rodrigues, André ^a   Teixeira, Rita ^a   Bentes, Isabel ^a   Varajão, João ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

^b Centro ALGORITMI ^*

^c Centro Algoritmi   (Portugal)

Author keywords

academic opinion; public acceptance; water reuse

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; INCOME; PERCEPTION; URBAN AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT;

PORTUGAL;

EID: 84890603639     PISSN: 1573062X     EISSN: 17449006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2013.775314     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Angelakis, A.N.M., Marecos do Monte, M.H.F., Bontoux, L., and Asano, T., 1999. The status of wastewater reuse practice in the Mediterranean basin: need for guidelines. Water Research, 33 (10), 2201-2217.
2. Alhumoud, J.M., Behbehani, H.S., and Abdullah, T.H., 2003. Wastewater reuse practices in Kuwait. The Environmentalist, 23 (2), 117-126.
3. Baggett, S., Jeffrey, P., and Jefferson, B., 2006. Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination, 187 (1-3), 149-158.
4. Baumann, D. and Kasperson, R., 1974. Public acceptance of renovated waste water: myth and reality. Water Resources Research, 10 (4), 667-673.
5. Bruvold, W.H., 1972. Public attitudes towards reuse of reclaimed water. vol. 137. Berkeley, CA: Water Resource Centre, University of California.
6. Bruvold, W.H., 1984. Obtaining public support for innovative reuse projects. In: Proceedings of the Water Reuse Symposium. vol. 3, 26-31 August 1984, San Diego, CA. Denver, CO: AWWA Research Foundation, 122-132.
7. Bruvold, W.H., 1988. Public opinion on water reuse options. Journal WPCF, 60 (1), 45-49.
8. Bruvold, W.H., 1998. Public opinion on water reuse options. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 60 (1), 45-50.
9. Crook, J., 2003. An overview of water reuse, Keynote lecture at International Seminar on Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse. Organized by MED-REUNET (Mediterranean Network of Water Reclamation and Reuse). Sponsored by EU Research Directorates General, Agbar Foundation (Spain) and Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. Available from: http://www.med-reunet.com/02medr1/03_seminar.asp (Accessed 11 July 2012).
10. Crook, J., Okun, D., and Pincince, A., 1994. Water reuse, report to WERF (Water Environment Research Foundation). Project 92-WRE-1. Alexandria, VA: WERF.
11. Denlay, J. and Dowsett, B., 1994. Water Reuse the most reliable water supply available, Report prepared as part of the Sydney Water Project, Friends of the Earth Inc, Sydney, Australia.
12. Dishman, C.M., Sherrard, J.H., and Rebhun, M., 1989. Gaining public support for direct potable water reuse. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 115 (2), 154-161.
13. Dolnicar, S. and Schäfer, A.I., 2009. Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of the accepters. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (2), 888-900.
14. Domènech, L., and Saurí, D., 2010. Socio-technical transitions in water scarcity contexts: Public acceptance of greywater reuse technologies in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55 (2010), 53-62.
15. EPA, 1992. US Environmental Protection Agency, manual: guidelines for water reuse, office of water and office of research and development, EPA/625/R-92/004. Washington, D.C.: Agency for International Development.
16. Flack, J.E. and Greenberg, J., 1987. Public attitudes towards water conservation. Journal of the American Water Works Association., 79 (3), 46-51.
17. Friedler, E., Lahav, O., Jizhaki, H., and Lahav, T., 2006. Study of urban population attitudes towards various wastewater reuse options: Israel as a case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 81 (4), 360-370.
18. Hartley, T.W., 2006. Public perception and participation in water reuse. Desalination, 187, 115-126.
19. Hurlimann, A., 2007a. Attitudes to future use of recycled water in a Bendigo office building. Water Journal of the Australian Water Association, 34 (6), 58-64.
20. Hurlimann, A., 2007b. Is recycled water use risky? An urban Australian community's perspective. The Environmentalist, 27 (1), 83-94.
21. Hurlimann, A., 2007c. Recycling water for Australia's future - the case of two Victorian cities. In: State of Australian Cities Conference. 27-30 November, Adelaide, South Australia.
22. Hurlimann, A., 2008. Community attitudes to recycled water use: An urban Australian case study - part 2, research report No. 56. Adelaide, SA: Cooperative Research Centre for Water Quality and Treatment.
23. Hurlimann, A. and McKay, J., 2004. Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: Part 2. Trust. Water. Journal of the Australian Water Association, 31 (5), 40-45.
24. Hurlimann, A. and McKay, J., 2007. Urban Australians using recycled water for domestic non-potable use - An evaluation of the attributes price, saltiness, colour and odour using conjoint analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 83 (2007), 93-104.
25. Hurlimann, A.C., Hemphill, E., McKay, J., and Geursen, G., 2008. Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. Journal of Environmental Management, 88 (4), 1221-1232.
26. INE, 2011. Censos 2010. Lisboa, Portugal: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.
27. Jeffrey, P. and Jefferson, B., 2003. Public receptivity regarding in-house water recycling: results from a UK survey. Water Science and Technology- Water Supply, 3 (3), 109-116.
28. Jeffrey, P. and Temple, C., 1999. Sustainable water management: some technological and social dimensions of water recycling. Sustainable Development International, 1, 63-66.
29. Khan, S.J. and Gerrard, L.E., 2006. Stakeholder communications for successful water reuse operations. Desalination, 187, 191-202.
30. Kantanoleon, N., Zampetakis, L., and Manios, T., 2007. Public perspective towards wastewater reuse in a medium size, seaside, Mediterranean city: A pilot survey. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 50, 282-292.
31. Lohman, L.C. and Milliken, J.G., 1985. Informational/educational approaches to public attitudes on potable reuse of wastewater. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior.
32. Macpherson, L., and Law, I., 2003. Winning minds to water, reuse: The road to NEWater. In: 18th Annual WateReuse Symposium: Water Reuse - A Resource Without Boarders, WateReuse Association. 7-10 September 2003, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
33. Marecos do Monte, M.H., 1996. Contributo para a Utilização de Águas Residuais tratadas para Irrigação em Portugal. Lisboa, Portugal: LNEC.
34. Marks, J., 2004. Back to the future: reviewing the findings on acceptance of reclaimed water. In: Conference Proceedings, Enviro04, Australian Water Association. 28-31 March 2004,Sydney, Australia.
35. Marks, J., Cromar, N., Fallowfield, H., and Oemcke, D., 2003. Community experience and perceptions of water reuse. Water Science & Technology-Water Supply, 3 (3), 9-16.
36. Marks, J.S., 2006. Taking the public seriously: the case of potable and non potable reuse. Desalination, 187, 137-147.
37. Marks, J.S., Martin, B., and Zadoroznyj, M., 2006. Acceptance of water recycling in Australia: national baseline data. Water, 33 (2), 151-157.
38. McKay, J. and Hurlimann, A.C., 2003. Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: Part 1. Age. Water. Journal of the Australian Water Association, 30 (5), 45-49.
39. Melo-Batista, J., 2002. Improving the efficiency of water use efficiency as a contribution to the sustainability of natural resources. 10th National Meeting of Sanitation: Sustainable use of water: Portuguese situation and future prospects. 16-19 September 2002, Braga.16pp.
40. Menegaki, A., Hanley, N., and Tsagarakis, K.P., 2006. Social acceptability and evaluation of recycled water in Crete: a study of consumers' and farmers' attitudes. Ecological Economics, 62 (1), 7-18.
41. Nancarrow, B., Leviston, Z., Po, M., Porter, N., and Tucker, D., 2008. What drives communities' decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 57 (4), 485-491.
42. Olson, B.H., Henning, J.A., Marshack, R.A., and Rigby, M.G., 1979. Educational and social factors affecting public acceptance of reclaimed water. In: Water Reuse Symposium. Denver, CO: AWWARF, 1219-1231.
43. PNUEA, 2001. Programa Nacional para o Uso Eficiente da Água. Lisboa, Portugal: MAOT-IA.
44. Po, M., Nancarrow, B.E., Leviston, Z., Poter, N.B., Syme, G.J., and Kaercher, J.D., 2005. Predicting community behaviour in relation to wastewater reuse: what drives decisions to accept or reject? Water for a healthy country national research flagship. Perth, WA: CSIRO Land and Water.
45. Robinson, K.G., Robinson, C.H., and Hawkins, S.A., 2005. Assessment of public perception regarding wastewater reuse. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 5 (1), 59-65.
46. Simpson, J.M., 1999. Changing community attitudes to potable reuse in South-East Queensland. Water Science and Technology, 40 (4-5), 59-66.
47. Stone, R. and Kahle, R., 1974. Wastewater reclamation. Socio economics, technology and public acceptance. Washington, DC: Office of Water Resource Research, US Department of the Interior.
48. Tsagarakis, K.P., Mellon, R., Stamataki, E., and Kounalaki, E., 2007. Identification of recycled water with an empirically derived symbol increases its probability of use. Environmental Science and Technology, 41 (20), 6901-6908.
49. Van der Hoek, J.P., Dijkman, B.J., Terpstra, G.J., Uitzinger, M.J., and van Dillen, M.R.B., 1999. Selection and evaluation of a new concept of water supply for Ijburg Amsterdam. Water Science and Technology, 39 (5), 33-40.