The communication of inductive inferences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1221 LNAI, Issue , 1997, Pages 223-241

  Davies, Winton ^a   Edwards, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION BETWEEN AGENTS; INDUCTIVE INFERENCE; NEW APPROACHES; PARTIAL VIEWS; REFINEMENT TECHNIQUES; SET OPERATION; VERSION SPACE; VOTING METHOD;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

COMMUNICATION; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84890584683     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-62934-3_51     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. P. Brazdil, M. Gams, S. Sian, L. Torgo, and W. Van de Velde (1991). Learning in Distributed Systems and Multi-Agent Environments, In Proceedings of the European Working Session on Learning (EWSL91 ), Springer-Verlag, pages 424-439, Porto, Portugal.
2. P. Brazdil and L. Torgo (1990). Knowledge Acquisition via Knowledge Integration, in Current Trends" in, B. Wielenga et al.(eds.), IOS Press, Amsterdam.
3. N. Cesa-Bianchi, Y. Freund, D. P. Helmbold, D. Haussler, R. E. Schapire, and M. K. Warmuth (1995). How to Use Expert Advice, Technical Report UCSC-CRL- 95-19, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.
4. P. K. Chan and S. J. Stolfo (1995). A Comparative Evaluation of Voting and Meta- Learning on Partitioned Data, In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning (ML95), Morgan-Kaufmann, pages 90-98, Lake Tahoe, CA.
5. W. Davies (1993). ANIMALS, An Integrated Multi-Agent Learning System, M.Se. Thesis, Department of Computing Science, University of Aberdeen, UK.
6. M. Des-Jardins and Diana F. Gordon (1995). Evaluation and Selection of Biases in Machine Learning, Machine Learning, 20:1-17.
7. T. Finin, J. Weber, G. Wiederhold, M. Geneserth, R. Fritzson, D. MacKay, J. McGuire, R. Pelavin, S. Shapiro, and C. Beck (1993). Draft Specification of the KQML Agent-Communication Language, Unpublished Draft.
8. R. W. Floyd and R. Beigel (1994). The Language of Machines, Computer Science Press, NY.
9. M. Gams (1989). New Measurements Highlight the Importance of Redundant Knowledge, In Proceedings of the 4th European Working Session on Learning (EWSL89), Pitman-Morgan Kaufmann, pages 71-80, Montpellier, France.
10. M. Genesereth (1995). Epilog for Lisp 2.0 Manual. Epistemics Inc., Palo Alto, CA.
11. H. Hirsh (1989). Incremental Version Space Merging: A General Framework for Concept Learning, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University.
12. S. Jain and A. Sharma (1993). Computational Limits on Team Identification of Languages, Technical Report 9301, School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Australia.
13. M. Kearns and H. S. Seung (1995). Learning from a Population of Hypotheses, Machine Learning, 18:255-276.
14. N. Lavrac and S. Dzeroski (1994). Inductive Logic Programming: Techniques and Applications, Ellis Horwood, Herts, UK.
15. R. S. Michalski (1993). Inferential Theory of Learning as a Conceptual Basis for Multistrategy Learning, Machine Learning, 11:111-151.
16. T. M. Mitchell (1978). Version spaces: An Approach to Concept Learning, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University.
17. T. M. Mitchell, R. M. Keller, and S. T. Kedar-Cabell (1986). Explanation-Based Generalization: A Unifying View, Machine Learning, 1:1-33.
18. R. J. Mooney and D. Ourston (1991). A Multistrategy Approach to Theory Refinement, In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Multistrategy Learning, pages 115-130, Harper's Ferry, WV.
19. S. Muggleton (1992). Inductive Logic Programming, Academic Press, London, UK.
20. S. H. Nienhuys-Cheng and R. De Wolf (1996). Least Generalizations and Greatest Specializations of Sets of Clauses, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4:341-363.
21. M. Pazzani and D. Kibler (1992). The Utility of Knowledge in Inductive Learning, Machine Learning, 9: 57-94.
22. F. J. Provost and D. N. Hennessy (1995). Distributed Machine Learning: Scaling up with Coarse Grained Parallelism, In Proceedings of the Second InternationalConference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB94), AAAI Press, pages 340-348, Stanford, CA.
23. J. R. Quinlan (1986). Induction of Decision Trees, Machine Learning, 1:81-106.
24. J. R. Quinlan (1990). Learning Logical Definitions from Relations, Machine Learning, 5:239-266.
25. J. R. Quinlan (1994). The Minimum Description Length Principle and Categorical Theories, In Machine Learning, Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop (ML94), Morgan Kaufmann, d, New Brunswick, NJ.
26. S. S. Sian (1991). Learning in Distributed Artificial Intelligence Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, UK.
27. B. Silver, W. Frawley, G. Iba, J. Vittal, and K. Bradford (1990). ILS: A Framework for Multi-Paradigmatic Learning, In Machine Learning, Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop (ML90), Morgan Kaufmann, pages 348-356, Austin, TX.
28. B. D. Smith (1995). Induction as Knowledge Integration, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California.
29. V. Svatek (1994). Integration of Rules from Expert and Rules Discovered in Data, Unpublished Draft, Prague University of Economics, Czech Republic.
30. P. E. Utgoff (1989). Incremental Induction of Decision Trees, Machine Learning, 4:161-186.