Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 776-785

  Kershah, Sharif ^a   Partovi, Sasan ^a   Traughber, Bryan J ^a   Muzic Jr , Raymond F ^a   Schluchter, Mark D ^a   O'Donnell, James K ^a   Faulhaber, Peter ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Patient population; PET CT; PET MRI; SUV

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ATTENUATION CORRECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MUSCLE; HUMAN; ILIOPSOAS MUSCLE; LIVER; LUNG PARENCHYMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ATTENUATION CORRECTION; MALE; MEDIASTINUM; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PET-CT SCANNER; PET-MRI SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSOAS MUSCLE; RADIOACTIVITY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIMODAL IMAGING; NEOPLASMS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84890568999     PISSN: 15361632     EISSN: 18602002     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11307-013-0629-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beyer T, Freudenberg L, Czernin J et al (2011) The future of hybrid imaging - part 3: PET/MR, small-animal imaging and beyond. Insights into Imaging 2:235-246
2. Partovi S, Schulte AC, Jacobi B et al (2012) Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI of human skeletal muscle at 1.5 and 3 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:1227-1232
3. Heiss WD (2009) The potential of PET/MR for brain imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:105-112
4. Antoch G, Bockisch A (2009) Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:S113-S120
5. Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M et al (2012) First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med 53:845-855
6. Boss A, Bisdas S, Kolb A et al (2010) Hybrid PET/MRI of intracranial masses: initial experiences and comparison to PET/CT. J Nucl Med 51:1198-1205
7. Boss A, Stegger L, Bisdas S et al (2011) Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR imaging in the head and upper neck area. Eur Radiol 21:1439-1446
8. Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T et al (1998) Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 25:2046-2053
9. Kinahan PE, Hasegawa BH, Beyer T (2003) X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. Semin Nucl Med 33:166-179
10. Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Slosman DO (2004) Attenuation compensation in cerebral 3D PET: effect of the attenuation map on absolute and relative quantitation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:52-63
11. Hofmann M, Steinke F, Scheel V et al (2008) MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI: a novel approach combining pattern recognition and atlas registration. J Nucl Med 49:1875-1883
12. Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Slosman DO (2003) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography. Med Phys 30:937-948
13. Hofmann M, Bezrukov I, Mantlik F et al (2011) MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods. J Nucl Med 52:1392-1399
14. Zaidi H (2007) Is MR-guided attenuation correction a viable option for dual-modality PET/MR imaging? Radiology 244:639-642
15. Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G et al (2009) Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med 50:520-526
16. Ma J, Costelloe CM, Madewell JE et al (2009) Fast Dixon-based multisequence and multiplanar MRI for whole-body detection of cancer metastases. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:1154-1162
17. Keereman V, Fierens Y, Broux T et al (2010) MRI-based attenuation correction for PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time sequences. J Nucl Med 51:812-818
18. Berker Y, Franke J, Salomon A et al (2012) MRI-based attenuation correction for hybrid PET/MRI systems: a 4-class tissue segmentation technique using a combined ultrashort-echo-time/Dixon MRI sequence. J Nucl Med 53:796-804
19. Schulz V, Torres-Espallardo I, Renisch S et al (2011) Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:138-152
20. Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME et al (2007) Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med 48:471-480
21. Zaidi H, Ojha N, Morich M et al (2011) Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET-MRI system. Phys Med Biol 56:3091-3106
22. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y et al (2009) From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50(Suppl 1):122S-150S
23. Taylor R (1990) Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Sonography 1:35-39
24. Westerterp M, Pruim J, Oyen W et al (2007) Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:392-404
25. Scheuermann JS, Saffer JR, Karp JS et al (2009) Qualification of PET scanners for use in multicenter cancer clinical trials: the American College of Radiology Imaging Network experience. J Nucl Med 50:1187-1193
26. Nahmias C, Wahl LM (2008) Reproducibility of standardized uptake value measurements determined by 18F-FDG PET in malignant tumors. J Nucl Med 49:1804-1808
27. Keereman V, Holen RV, Mollet P et al (2011) The effect of errors in segmented attenuation maps on PET quantification. Med Phys 38:6010-6019
28. Robson MD, Gatehouse PD, Bydder M et al (2003) Magnetic resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27:825-846
29. Robson MD, Bydder GM (2006) Clinical ultrashort echo time imaging of bone and other connective tissues. NMR Biomed 19:765-780
30. Johansson A, Karlsson M, Nyholm T (2011) CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. Med Phys 38:2708-2714
31. Eiber M, Martinez-Moller A, Souvatzoglou M et al (2011) Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38:1691-1701
32. Chin BB, Green ED, Turkington TG et al (2009) Increasing uptake time in FDG-PET: standardized uptake values in normal tissues at 1 versus 3 h. Mol Imaging Biol 11(2):118-122
33. Cheng G, Alavi A, Lim E et al (2012) Dynamic changes of FGD uptake and clearance in normal tissues. Mol Imaging Biol. doi: 10.1007/s11307-012-0600-0