The negotiations of the Nagoya Protocol: Issues, coalitions and process

Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 33-59

  Wallbott, Linda ^a   Wolff, Franziska ^b   Pozarowska, Justyna ^c  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b German think tank Öko Institut   (Germany)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890553383     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203078020     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Aubertin, C. and Filoche, G. (2011) 'The Nagoya Protocol on the Use of Genetic Resources: One Embodiment of an Endless Discussion', Sustentabilidade em Debate 2(1): 51-64.
2. Barber, C., Johnston, S. and Tobin, B. (2003) User Measures-Options for Developing Measures in User Countries to Implement the Access and Benefit-Sharing Provisions of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2nd edn, Tokyo: United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies (UNU-IAS).
3. Berger, M., Murugi, J., Buch, E., IJsselmuiden C., Kennedy, A., Moran, M., Guzman, J., Devlin, M. and Kubata, B. (2010) Strengthening Pharmaceutical Innovation in Africa, Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED); New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD), http://www.policycures.org/downloads/COHREDNEPAD_Strengthening_Pharmaceutical_Innovation_AfricaREPORT.pdf (accessed 13 March 2013).
4. Berne Declaration (BD), ECOROPOA, Seed, TWN (2009) The International ABS Regime. Scope and Definitions is a Key Issue for the Fate of Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing, http://www.evb.ch/cm_data/ABSWG-7-NGO-Definition.pdf (10 February 2013).
5. Billé, R., Le Duc, J.-P. and Mermet, L. (2010) 'Global Biodiversity Targets: Vain Wishes or Significant Opportunities for Biodiversity Governance?', in R. Billé, L. Chabason, C. Chiarolla, M. Jardin, G. Kleitz, G., J.-P. Le Duc, and L. Mermet, Global Governance of Biodiversity. New Perspectives on a Shared Challenge, Health and Environment Report No. 6, Paris: Institut Français des Relations Internationales, 45-85.
6. Bourne Partners (2011) Biotechnology Market Overview, June 2011, http://bournepartners.wordpress.com/2011/07/01/biotechnology-market-overview-june-2011/ (accessed 25 March 2013).
7. Bovarnick, A. and Alpizar, F. (2010) 'Introduction', in A. Bovarnick, F. Alpizar and C. Schnell (eds.) The Importance of Biodiversity and Ecosystems in Economic Growth and Equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: An Economic Valuation of Ecosystems, United Nations Development Programme, 2-5, http://web.undp.org/latinamerica/biodiversity-superpower/Report/Introductory_and_Methodology_Chapters_%28chapters_1,2,3%29_ENG.pdf (accessed 25 March 2013).
8. Brand, U., Görg, C., Hirsch, J. and Wissen, M. (2008) Conflicts in Environmental Regulation and the Internationalisation of the State. Contested Terrains, London/New York: Routledge.
9. Buck, M. and Hamilton, C. (2011) 'The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity', Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 20(1): 47-61.
10. CBD (2007a) Report of the Meeting of the Group of Legal and Technical Experts on an Internationally Recognized Certificate of Origin/Source/Legal Provenance, UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/5/7, 20 February 2007, Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity.
11. CBD (2007b). Compilation of Submissions by Parties, Governments, Indigenous and Local Communities and Stakeholders on Concrete Options on Substantive Items on the Agenda of the Fifth and Sixth Meetings of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Access and Benefit Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/6/INF/3, 13 December 2007.
12. CBD (2008a) Report of the Ad Hoc Open-Ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-Sharing on the Work of Its Sixth Meeting, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/9/6, 31 January 2008.
13. CBD (2008b) Report of the Meeting of the Group of Legal and Technical Experts on Concepts, Terms, Working Definitions and Sectoral Approaches, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/7/2, 12 December 2008.
14. CBD (2009a) Report of the Meeting of the Group of Legal and Technical Experts on Compliance in the Context of the International Regime on Access and Benefit-Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/7/3, 10 February 2009.
15. CBD (2009b) Report of the Meeting of the Group of Technical and Legal Experts on Traditional Knowledge Associated with Genetic Resources in the Context of the International Regime on Access and Benefit-Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/8/2, 15 July 2009.
16. CBD (2010a) 'Annex I-Revised Draft Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity', in Report of the First Part of the Ninth Meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-Ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/9/3, 26 April 2010.
17. CBD (2010b) Report of the Third Part of the Ninth Meeting of the Ad Hoc Open-Ended Working Group on Access and Benefit-Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/10/5/Add.5, 17 October 2010.
18. CBD (2011) Report of the Tenth Meeting of the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/COP/10/27, 20 January 2011.
19. CBD Alliance (2010) ECO 30(2), Friday, 26 March 2010.
20. Chambers, W.B. (2003) 'Emerging International Rules on the Commercialization of Genetic Resources: The FAO International Plant Genetic Treaty and CBD Bonn Guidelines', Journal of World Intellectual Property 6(2): 311-329.
21. Chandler, M. (1993) 'Biodiversity Convention: Selected Issues of Interest to the International Lawyer', Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 4(1): 141-175.
22. Deere, C. (2011) The Implementation Game: The TRIPS Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Property Reform in Developing Countries, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23. Dutfield, G. (2000) Intellectual Property Rights, Trade and Biodiversity, London: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.
24. ENB (2009) 'ABS Highlights: Tuesday 10 November 2009', Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9(484).
25. ENB (2010a) 'Summary of the Ninth Meeting of the Working Group on Access and Benefit-Sharing of the Convention on Biological Diversity: 22-28 March 2010', Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9(503).
26. ENB (2010b) 'CBD COP 10 Highlights: Thursday 28 October 2010', Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9(542).
27. ENB (2010c) 'Summary of the Tenth Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: 18-29 October 2010', Earth Negotiations Bulletin 9(544).
28. Ernst & Young (2011) Beyond Borders-Global Biotechnology Report 2011, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Global_Biotechnology_Report_2011/$FILE/Biotech_BeyondBorders_2011.pdf (accessed 26 March 2013).
29. Espicom (2012) The Outlook for Pharmaceuticals in Latin America, http://www.espicom. com/pharmaceuticals-outlook-latin-america (accessed 15 June 2013).
30. Flitner, M. (1995) Sammler, Räuber und Gelehrte: Die politischen Interessen an pflanzengenetischen Ressourcen 1895-1995, Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
31. Frankel, O.H and Bennett, E. (eds.) (1970) Genetic Resources in Plants: Their Exploration and Conservation, FAO-IBP Technical Conference on the Exploration, Utilization, and Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources (1967: Rome, Italy), Conference Proceedings Edition, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
32. Frein, M. and Meyer, H. (2010) Das ABC des ABS-Regimes. Biopiraterie und die Verhandlungen auf dem Weg nach Nagoya, Bonn: Church Development Service (EED).
33. Frein, M. and Meyer, H. (2011) The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Berlin: World Wildlife Fund (WWF)/Church Development Service (EED).
34. Frison, C. (2007) 'Belgian Federal Survey: Public Infrastructures and ABS Regulations for Innovation in the Life Science Research: Access, Conservation and Use of Biological Diversity in the General Interest', in U. Feit and F. Wolff (eds.) European Regional Meeting on an Internationally Recognized Certificate of Origin/Source/Legal Provenance, Report of the International Workshop hosted by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation in the Isle of Vilm, 24-29 October 2006, Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz, 100-106.
35. Görg, C. and Brand, U. (2006) 'Contested Regimes in the International Political Economy: Global Regulation of Genetic Resources and the Internationalization of the State', Global Environmental Politics 6(4): 101-123.
36. Gupta, M.P. (2011) Access and Benefit Sharing: Viewpoints from Provider Countries, Center for Pharmacognostic Research on Panamanian Flora, College of Pharmacy, University of Panamá, http://www.icsu.org/freedom-responsibility/pdf-images/ABS_WS_Presentation_Gupta.pdf (accessed 25 March 2013).
37. Haila, Y. and Kouki, J. (1994) 'The Phenomenon of Biodiversity in Conservation Biology', Annales Zoologici Fennici 31(1): 5-18.
38. Heins, V. (2001) Der Neue Transnationalismus. Nichtregierungsorganisationen und Firmen im Konflikt um die Rohstoffe der Biotechnologie. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
39. Hernandez, S. (2007) 'Non-paper on Economic Valuation of the Use of Genetic Resources in France', in U. Feit and F. Wolff (eds.) European Regional Meeting on an Inter-nationally Recognized Certificate of Origin/Source/Legal Provenance. Report of the International Workshop hosted by the German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation in the Isle of Vilm, Germany, 24-29 October 2006, Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz, 107-108.
40. Just, D., Kornherr, N., Litzka, R. and Oppermann, L. (2010) 'Odyssee des internationalen ABS-Regimes. Eine Analyse struktureller Probleme und asymmetrischer Kräfteverhältnisse', in U. Brand (ed.) Globale Umweltpolitik und Internationalisierung des Staates-Biodiversitätspolitik aus strategisch-relationaler Perspektive, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 27-74.
41. Kamau, E.C., Fedder, B. and Winter, G. (2010) 'The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: What is New and What Are the Implications for Provider and User Countries and the Scientific Community?', Law, Environment and Development Journal 6(3): 246-262.
42. LMMC (2002a) Cancún Declaration of Like-Minded Megadiverse Countries, http://www. weltvertrag.org/e375/e719/e1045/CancunDeclarationonLike-MindedMegadiversity Countries_2002_ger.pdf (accessed 10 February 2013).
43. LMMC (2002b) Cusco Declaration on Access to Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights of Like-minded Megadiverse Countries, http://www. comunidadandina.org/ingles/documentos/documents/cusco29-11-02.htm (accessed 10 February 2013).
44. LMMC (2005) New Delhi Ministerial Declaration on ABS, http://www.chmguatemala.gob. gt/Members/esolorzano/mis-documentos-2011/documentos/paises-megadiversos-lmmc/New%20Delhi%20Ministerial%20Declaration%20on%20ABS.pdf (accessed 10 February 2013).
45. McConnell, F. (1996) The Biodiversity Convention. A Negotiating History, London/The Hague/Boston: Kluwer Law International.
46. McGraw, D.M. (2002) 'The Story of the Biodiversity Convention: From Negotiation to Implementation', in P.G. Le Prestre (ed.) Governing Global Biodiversity: The Evolution and Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Hampshire, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 7-38.
47. Mooney, P. (1983) 'The Law of the Seed', Development Dialogue 1983, 1-2, http://www. dhf.uu.se/publications/development-dialogue/the-law-of-the-seed-another-develop ment-and-plant-geneticresources/ (accessed 25 March 2013).
48. Nijar, G.S. (2011a) The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources: An Analysis, CEBLAW Brief, Kuala Lumpur: Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity Law (CEBLAW).
49. Nijar, G.S. (2011b) The Nagoya ABS Protocol and Pathogens-Policy Brief No. 4, Geneva: South Centre.
50. Nijar, G.S. (2011c) The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources: Analysis and Implementation Options for Developing Countries. Research Papers 36, Geneva: South Centre.
51. Oberthür, S., Gerstetter, C., Lucha, C., McGlade, K., Pozarowska, J. and Rabitz, F., (2011) Intellectual Property Rights on Genetic Resources and the Fight Against Poverty. Study for the European Parliament, Brussels: Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union.
52. Pistorius, R.J. (1995) 'Forum-Shopping: Issue Linkages in the Genetic Resources Issue', in R. Bartlett, P. Kurian and M. Malik (eds.) International Organizations and Environmental Policy, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 209-221.
53. Raustiala, K. and Victor, D.G. (2004) 'The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources', International Organization 58(2): 277-309.
54. Rosendal, K. (1999) 'Biodiversity: Between Diverse International Arenas', in H.O. Bergesen, G. Parmannand and Ø.B. Thommessen (eds.) Yearbook of International Co-operation on Environment and Development 1999/2000, London: Earthscan, 39-47.
55. Rosendal, K. (2000) The Convention on Biological Diversity and Developing Countries, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
56. Rosendal, K. (2006a) 'The Convention on Biological Diversity: Tensions with the WTO TRIPS Agreement over Access to Genetic Resources and the Sharing of Benefits', in S. Oberthür and T. Gehring (eds.) Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance-Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 79-102.
57. Rosendal, K. (2006b) 'Regulating the Use of Genetic Resources-Between International Authorities', European Environment 16(5): 265-277.
58. Sampath, P.G. (2005) Regulating Bioprospecting: Institutions for Drug Research, Access, and Benefit-Sharing, Tokyo/New York/Paris: United Nations University Press.
59. SCBD (2010a) 'Access and Benefit-Sharing in Practice: Trends in Partnerships', CBD Technical Series No. 38, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
60. SCBD (2010b) Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
61. Schei, P.J. and Tvedt, M.W. (2010) 'Genetic Resources' in the CBD: The Wording, the Past, the Present and the Future, FNI Report 4/2010, Lysaker, Norway: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
62. Suplie, J. (1995) Streit auf Noahs Arche: Zur Genese der Biodiversitäts-Konvention, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
63. ten Kate, K. and Laird, S.A. (1999) The Commercial Use of Biodiversity: Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing, London: Earthscan.
64. TWN (2008) CBD Meeting Dominated by Talks on Access and Benefit Sharing Regime, Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
65. TWN (2009) Hope for an Anti-Biopiracy Treaty in 2010, Issue No. 231/232 (Nov/Dec 2009), Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
66. TWN (2010) Biodiversity Convention Adopts Landmark Decisions; Doubts Prevail on ABS Protocol, Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
67. TWN (2011) The Road to an Anti-Piracy Agreement, Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
68. VFA (2010) The Pharmaceutical Market, Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa), http://www.vfa.de/en/statistics/pharmaceuticalmarket/ (accessed 13 July 2012).
69. Voges, M. and Biberhofer, P. (2010) 'Neue Macht des Südens? Die Politisierung internationaler Biodiversitätspolitik durch die Like-Minded Group of Megadiverse Countries', in U. Brand (ed.) Globale Umweltpolitik und Internationalisierung des Staates-Biodiversitätspolitik aus strategisch-relationaler Perspektive, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 105-154.
70. Wilson, E.O. (ed.) (1988) Biodiversity, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
71. Winter, G. and Kamau, E.C. (2011) 'Von Biopiraterie zu Austausch und Kooperation', Archiv des Völkerrechts 49(4): 373-398.
72. Wolff, F. (2004) 'Legal Factors Driving Agrobiodiversity Loss', Environmental Law Network International (ELNI) Review 1/2004: 1-11.