A centipede nymph in Baltic amber and a new approach to document amber fossils

Organisms Diversity and Evolution

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 425-432

  Haug, Joachim T ^a   Müller, Carsten H G ^a   Sombke, Andy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D Imaging; Baltic amber; Chilopoda; Nymphal stadium; Palaeo evo devo

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBER; ARTHROPOD; DOCUMENTARY SOURCE; EMBRYO; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FOSSIL RECORD; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LIGHT EFFECT; NEW RECORD; NEW TAXON; ONTOGENY;

ARTHROPODA; CHILOPODA; LITHOBIIDAE; LITHOBIOMORPHA; MYRIAPODA;

EID: 84890549123     PISSN: 14396092     EISSN: 16181077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13127-013-0129-3     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Andersson, G. (1979). On the use of larval characters in the classification of lithobiomorph centipedes (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha. In M. Camatini (Ed.), Myriapod biology (pp. 73-81). London: Academic.
2. Andersson, G. (1981). Taxonomical studies on the post-embryonic development in Swedish Lithobiomorpha (Chilopoda). Entomologica Scandinavica (Suppl.), 16, 105-124.
3. Bolaños, J.; Cuesta, J. A.; Hernandez, G.; Hernandez, J.; Felder, D. L. (2004). Abbreviated larval development of Tunicotheres moseri (Rathbun, 1918) (Decapoda: Pinnotheridae), a rare case of parental care among brachyuran crabs. Scientia Marina, 68, 373-384.
4. Bonato, L.; Edgecombe, G. D.; Lewis, J. G. E.; Minelli, A.; Pereira, L. A.; Shelley, R. M.; et al. (2010). A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda). ZooKeys, 69, 17-51.
5. Borucki, H. (1996). Evolution und phylogentisches System der Chilopoda (Mandibulata, Tracheata). Verhandlungen des naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, NF, 35, 95-226.
6. Cuesta, J. A.; Schubart, C. D. (1999). First zoeal stages of Geograpsus lividus and Goniopsis pulchra from Panama confirm consistent larval characters for the subfamily Grapsinae (Crustacea: Brachyura: Grapsidae). Ophelia, 51, 163-176.
7. Cuesta, J. A.; Liu, H.; Schubart, C. D. (2002). First zoeal stages of Epigrapsus politus Heller, E. notatus (Heller) and Gecarcoidea lalandii H. Milne-Edwards, with remarks on zoeal morphology of the Gecarcinidae Macleay (Crustacea: Brachyura). Journal of Natural History, 36, 1671-1685.
8. Cuggy, M. B. (1994). Ontogenetic variation in Silurian eurypterids from Ontario and New York State. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 31, 728-732.
9. Dunlop, J. A. (2002). Arthropods from the Lower Devonian Severnaya Zemlya Formation of October Revolution Island (Russia). Geodiversitas, 24(2), 349-379.
10. Edgecombe, G. D. (2004). A new species of the henicopid centipede Haasiella (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha): new species from Australia, with a morphology-based phylogeny of Henicopidae. Journal of Natural History, 38, 37-76.
11. Edgecombe, G. D. (2011). Chilopoda - Fossil history. In A. Minelli (Ed.), Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda I (pp. 355-361). Leiden: Brill.
12. Edgecombe, G. D.; Giribet, G. (2004). Adding mitochondrial sequence data (16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda, Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 42, 89-134.
13. Edgecombe, G. D.; Minelli, A.; Bonato, L. (2009). A geophilomorph centipede (Chilopoda) from La Buzinie amber (Late Cretaceous: Cenomanian), SW France. Geodiversitas, 31, 29-39.
14. Haug, J. T.; Maas, A.; Waloszek, D. (2009a). Ontogeny of two Cambrian stem crustaceans, †Goticaris longispinosa and †Cambropachycope clarksoni. Palaeontographica A, 289, 1-43.
15. Haug, J. T.; Haug, C.; Maas, A.; Fayers, S. R.; Trewin, N. H.; Waloszek, D. (2009b). Simple 3D images from fossil and recent micromaterial using light microscopy. Journal of Microscopy, 233, 93-101.
16. Haug, J. T.; Maas, A.; Waloszek, D. (2010a). †Henningsmoenicaris scutula, †Sandtorpia vestrogothiensis gen. et sp. nov. and heterochronic events in early crustacean evolution. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 100, 311-350.
17. Haug, J. T.; Waloszek, D.; Haug, C.; Maas, A. (2010b). High-level phylogenetic analysis using developmental sequences: the Cambrian †Martinssonia elongata, †Musacaris gerdgeyeri gen. et sp. nov. and their position in early crustacean evolution. Arthropod Structure and Development, 39, 154-173.
18. Haug, J. T.; Haug, C.; Waloszek, D.; Schweigert, G. (2011). The importance of lithographic limestones for revealing ontogenies in fossil crustaceans. Swiss Journal of Geosciences, 104(Suppl.), 1, 85-98.
19. Haug, C.; Van Roy, P.; Leipner, A.; Funch, P.; Rudkin, D. M.; Schöllmann, L.; et al. (2012a). A holomorph approach to xiphosuran evolution - a case study on the ontogeny of Euproops. Development, Genes and Evolution, 222, 253-268.
20. Haug, J. T.; Waloszek, D.; Maas, A.; Liu, Y.; Haug, C. (2012b). Functional morphology, ontogeny and evolution of mantis shrimp-like predators in the Cambrian. Palaeontology, 55, 369-399.
21. Horner, J. R.; Goodwin, M. B. (2009). Extreme cranial ontogeny in the Upper Cretaceous dinosaur Pachycephalosaurus. PloS ONE, 4(10), art. e7626, 11pp.
22. Hughes, N. C.; Minelli, A.; Fusco, G. (2006). The ontogeny of trilobite segmentation: a comparative approach. Paleobiology, 32, 602-627.
23. Klug, C. (2001). Life-cycles of Emsian and Eifelian ammonoids (Devonian). Lethaia, 34, 215-233.
24. Knowlton, R. E.; Vargo, C. K. (2004). The larval morphology of Palaemon floridanus Chace, 1942 (Decapoda, Palaemonidae) compared with other species of Palaemon and Palaemonetes. Crustaceana, 77, 683-715.
25. Kobbert, M. J. (2005). Bernstein - Fenster in die Urzeit. Göttingen: Planet Poster.
26. Kukalová-Peck, J. (1997). Mazon Creek insect fossils: the origin of insect wings and clues about the origin of insect metamorphosis. In C. W. Shabica & A. A. Hay (Eds.), Richardson's guide to the fossil fauna of Mazon Creek (pp. 194-207). Chicago: Northeastern Illinois University Press.
27. Lago, R. P. (1988). Larval development of Spiroplax spiralis (Barnard, 1950) (Brachyura: Hexapodidae) in the laboratory; the systematic position of the family on the basis of larval morphology. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 8, 576-593.
28. Lago, R. P. (1993). Larval development of Sesarma guttatum A. Milne Edwards (Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsidae) reared in the laboratory, with comments on larval generic and familial characters. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 13, 745-762.
29. Lewis, J. G. E. (1981). The biology of centipedes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Malchus, N. (2000). Early shell stages of the Middle Jurassic bivalves Camptochlamys (Pectinidae) and Atreta (Dimyidae) from Poland. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 66, 577-581.
31. Manton, S. M. (1965). The evolution of arthropod locomotory mechanisms. Part 8. Functional requirements and body designs in Chilopoda, together with a comparative account of their skeletomuscular systems and an appendix on the comparison between burrowing forces of annelids and chilopods and its bearing upon the evolution of the arthropodan haemocoel. Journal of the Linnean Society (Zoology), 46, 251-483.
32. McLaughlin, P. A.; Gore, R. H.; Crain, J. A. (1988). Studies on the Provenzanoi and other pagurid groups: 2. A reexamination of the larval stages of Pagurus hirsutiusculus hirsutiusculus (Dana) (Decapoda: Anomura: Paguridae) reared in the laboratory. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 8, 430-450.
33. McLaughlin, P. A.; Gore, R. H.; Harvey, A. W. (1991). Studies on the Provenzanoi and other pagurid groups: 5. The larval stages of Pagurus arenisaxatilis Harvey and McLaughlin, 1991 (Decapoda: Anomura: Paguridae), reared in the laboratory. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 11, 416-431.
34. McLaughlin, P. A.; Siddiqui, F. A.; Crain, J. A. (1993). Larval and early juvenile development in Pagurus stevensae Hart, 1971 (Decapoda: Anomura: Paguridae), reared in the laboratory. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 13, 322-342.
35. McWilliam, P. S. (1995). Evolution in the phyllosoma and puerulus phases of the spiny lobster genus Panulirus White. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 15, 542-557.
36. Minelli, A.; Koch, M. (2011). Chilopoda - General morphology. In A. Minelli (Ed.), Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda I (pp. 43-66). Leiden: Brill.
37. Minelli, A.; Sombke, A. (2011). Chilopoda - Development. In A. Minelli (Ed.), Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda I (pp. 295-308). Leiden: Brill.
38. Nützel, A.; Fryda, J.; Yancey, T. E.; Anderson, J. R. (2007). Larval shells of Late Palaeozoic naticopsid gastropods (Neritopsoidea: Neritimorpha) with a discussion of the early neritimorph evolution. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 81, 213-228.
39. Poinar, G. O.; Edwards, C. A. (1995). First description of a fossil symphylan, Scutigerella dominica sp. n. (Scutigerellidae, Symphyla) in Dominican amber. Experientia, 51, 391-393.
40. Rodriguez, A.; Spivak, E. D. (2001). The larval development of Panopeus margentus (Decapoda: Brachyura: Panopeidae) reared in the laboratory. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 21, 806-820.
41. Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. (2010). Developmental palaeontology in synapsids: the rock record of ontogeny in mammals and their closest relatives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, 1139-1147.
42. Santana, W.; Marques, F.; Pohle, G. (2004). Larval stages of Stenocionops furcatus (Olivier, 1791) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Majoidea) and a reappraisal of larval morphological characters for Mithracidae. Journal of Plankton Research, 26, 859-874.
43. Santana, W.; Pohle, G.; Marques, F. (2004b). Larval development of Apiomithrax violaceus (A. Milne Edwards, 1868) (Decapoda: Brachyura: Majoidea: Pisidae) reared in laboratory conditions, and a review of larval characters of Pisidae. Journal of Natural History, 38, 1773-1797.
44. Scheffel, H. (1969). Untersuchungen über die hormonale Regulation der Häutung und Anamorphose von Lithobius forficatus (L.) (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere, 74, 436-505.
45. Scheller, U.; Wunderlich, J. (2001). First description of a fossil pauropod, Eopauropus balticus n. gen. n. sp. (Pauropoda: Pauropodidae), in Baltic amber. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universität Hamburg, 85, 221-227.
46. Scheller, U.; Wunderlich, J. (2004). Two fossil symphylan species, Scutigerella baltica n. sp. and Hanseniella baltica n. sp. (Tracheata, Scutigerellidae), in Baltic amber. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie B (Geologie und Paläontologie), 351, 1-11.
47. Schoch, R. R.; Fröbisch, N. B. (2006). Metamorphosis and neoteny: alternative pathways in an extinct amphibian clade. Evolution, 60, 1467-1475.
48. Schubart, C. D.; Cuesta, J. A. (1998). First zoeal stages of four Sesarma species from Panama, with identification keys and remarks on the American Sesarminae (Crustacea: Brachyura: Grapsidae). Journal of Plankton Research, 20, 61-84.
49. Sevastopulo, G. D. (2005). The early ontogeny of blastoids. Geological Journal, 40, 351-362.
50. Shear, W. A.; Bonamo, P. M. (1988). Devonobiomorpha, a new order of centipedes (Chilopoda) from the Middle Devonian of Gilboa, New York State, USA, and the phylogeny of centipede orders. American Museum Novitates, 2917, 1-30.
51. Shear, W. A.; Edgecombe, G. D. (2010). The geological record and phylogeny of the Myriapoda. Arthropod Structure and Development, 39, 174-190.
52. Stein, M.; Waloszek, D.; Maas, A.; Haug, J. T.; Müller, K. J. (2008). Oelandocaris oelandica revisited. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 53, 461-484.
53. Strasser, K. M.; Felder, D. L. (1999). Larval development in two populations of the ghost shrimp Callichirus major (Decapoda: Thalassinidea) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 19, 844-878.
54. Sumrall, C. D. (2008). The origin of Lovén's Law in glyptocystitoid rhombiferans and its bearing on the plate homology and the heterochronic evolution of the hemicosmitid peristomal border. In W. I. Ausich & G. D. Webster (Eds.), Echinoderm Paleobiology (pp. 228-241). Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.
55. Sumrall, C. D.; Wray, G. A. (2007). Ontogeny in the fossil record: Diversification of body plans and the evolution of "aberrant" symmetry in Paleozoic echinoderms. Paleobiology, 33, 149-163.
56. Tack, Y. W. (1971). The larval and postlarval development of Parthenope serrata reared in the laboratory and the systematic position of the Parthenopinae (Crustacea, Brachyura). Biological Bulletin, 140, 166-189.
57. van Dover, C. L.; Gore, R. H.; Castro, P. (1986). Echinoecus pentagonus (A. Milne Edwards, 1879): larval development and systematic position (Crustacea: Brachyura: Xanthoidea nec Parthenopoidea). Journal of Crustacean Biology, 6, 757-776.
58. Verhoeff, K. W. (1905). Über die Entwicklungsstufen der Steinläufer, Lithobiiden, und Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Chilopoden. Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere, 8, 195-289.
59. Verhoeff, K. W. (1938). Zur Biologie der Scutigera coleoptrata und über die jüngeren Larvenstadien. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 150, 262-282.
60. Voigtländer, K. (2007). The life cycle of Lithobius mutabilis L. Koch, 1862 (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Bonner Zoologische Beiträge, 55, 9-25.
61. Walossek, D. (1993). The Upper Cambrian Rehbachiella and the phylogeny of Branchiopoda and Crustacea. Fossils and Strata, 32, 1-202.
62. Weitschat, W.; Wichard, W. (1998). Atlas der Pflanzen und Tiere im Baltischen Bernstein. München: Pfeil.
63. Wichard, W.; Gröhn, C.; Seredszus, F. (2009). Wasserinsekten im Baltischen Bernstein: Aquatic Insects in Baltic Amber. Remagen-Oberwinter: Kessel.
64. Yang, H. J.; Kim, C. H. (2005). Zoeal stages of Heptacarpus futilirostris (Decapoda, Caridea, Hippolytidae) reared in the laboratory. Crustaceana, 78, 543-564.
65. Zapparoli, M.; Edgecombe, G. D. (2011). Chilopoda - Taxonomic overview. Order Lithobiomorpha. In A. Minelli (Ed.), Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda I (pp. 371-389). Leiden: Brill.
66. Zhang, X.-G.; Maas, A.; Haug, J. T.; Siveter, D. J.; Waloszek, D. (2010). A eucrustacean metanauplius from the Lower Cambrian. Current Biology, 20, 1075-1079.