Chronological age vs biological age: An age-related normogram for antral follicle count, FSH and anti-Mullerian hormone

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1563-1567

  Wiweko, Budi ^a,b   Prawesti, Dyah Mustikaning Pitha ^a,b   Hestiantoro, Andon ^a,b   Sumapraja, Kanadi ^a,b   Natadisastra, Muharam ^a,b   Baziad, Ali ^a,b  

^a CIPTO MANGUNKUSUMO HOSPITAL   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INDONESIA   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Anti Mullerian hormone; Antral follicle count; FSH; Normogram

Indexed keywords

FOLLITROPIN; MUELLERIAN INHIBITING FACTOR;

ADULT; AGE; AGE DETERMINATION; ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; ARTICLE; CELL COUNT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLITROPIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL VALUE; NORMOGRAM; OVARIAN RESERVE; OVARY FOLLICLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGING; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; FEMALE; FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; MIDDLE AGED; OVARIAN FOLLICLE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890549097     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0083-1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alviggi C, Humaidan P, Howles CM, Tredway D, Hillier SG. Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology. J Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:101-13.
2. te Velde ER, Pearson PL. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2002;8:141-54.
3. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:366.
4. ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Fertility and ageing. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:261-76.
5. A long term analysis of the HFEA Register data 1991-2006. Available from: URL: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/en/1540.html
6. Howles CM, Kim CH, Elder K. Treatment strategies in assisted reproduction for women of advanced maternal age. Int Surg. 2006;91:S37-54.
7. Broekmans FJ, Soules MR, Fauser BC. Ovarian aging: mechanism and clinical consequences. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(5):465-93.
8. De Carvalho BR, de Sa Rosa e Silva A, Silva JC, dos Reis RM, Ferriani RA, de Sa MF. Ovarian reserve evaluation, state of the art. J Assisst Reprod Genet. 2008;25:311-22.
9. Visser JA, de Jong FH, Laven JSE, Themmen APN. Anti Mullerian Hormone: a new marker for ovarian function. Soc Reprod Fertil. 2006;131:1-9.
10. La Marca, Broekmans FJ, Volpe A, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. Anti Mullerian Hormone; what do we still need to know ? Human Reprod. 2009;24(9):2264-75.
11. Sowers MR, Eyvazzadeh AD, McConnell D, Yosef M, Jannausch ML, et al. Anti Mullerian Hormone and Inhibin B in the definition of ovarian aging and the menopause transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3478-83.
12. Soto N, Iniguez G, Lopez P, Larenas G, Mujica V, Rey RA, et al. Anti Mullerian Hormone and inhibin B levels as markers of premature ovarian aging and transition to menopause in type I diabetes mellitus. Human Reprod. 2009;24(11):2838-44.
13. Knauff EAH, Eijkmans MJC, Lambalk CB, Kate-Booij MJ, Hoek A, et al. Anti Mullerian Hormone, Inhibin B, and Antral Follicle Count in young woman with ovarian failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(3):786-92.
14. Almog B, Shehata MB, Shalom-Paz E, Tan SL, Tulandi T. Age related normogram for antral follicle count: McGill reference guide. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):663-6.
15. Seifer DB, Baker VL, Leader B. Age specific Anti Mullerian Hormone values for 17.120 women presenting to fertility centers within the United States. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):747-50.
16. Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace M, Fleming R, McConnachie A. Nomogram for the decline in serum anti mullerian hormone: a population study of 9.601 infertility patients. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):736-41.
17. Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med. 1992;11:1305-19.
18. Fanchin R, Taieb J, Lozano DH, Ducot B, Frydman R, Bouyer J. High reproducibility of serum anti mullerian hormone measurements suggests a multi-staged follicular secretion and strengthens its role in the assessment of ovarian follicular status. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(4):923-7.
19. Faddy MJ, Gosden RGM, Gourgeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles inmid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:1342-6.
20. Wiweko B, Hestiantoro A, Sumapraja K, Natadisastra M, Febia E, et al. Anti Mullerian hormone serum level indicates ovarian response in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation of IVF cycles. Indones J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;34(3):114-8.
21. Rosen MP, Johnstone E, McCulloch CE, Schuh-Huerta SM, Sternfeld B, Reijo-Pera RA, et al. A characterization of the relationship of ovarian reserve markers with age. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(1):238-43.
22. Gleicher N, Weghofer A, Barad DH. Discordance between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) an anti mullerian hormone (AMH) in female infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8(64):1-7.
23. Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N. Comparing anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as predictors of ovarian function. Fertil Steril. 2010;91(4):1553-5.