Institutional Geographic Information Systems and Geographic Information Partnering

The Handbook of Geographic Information Science

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 449-465

  Tulloch, David L ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Data sharing; Decision making; Geographic information systems (GIS); Internet map services; Spatial data infrastructures (SDIS)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890523133     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470690819.ch25     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Anderson, C. S. 1996. GIS development process: A framework for considering the initiation, acquisition, and incorporation of GIS technology. URISA Journal 8(1): 10-26.
2. Antenucci, J. C., Brown, K., Croswell, P. L., Kevany, M. J., and Archer, H. 1991. Geographic Information Systems: A Guide To The Technology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3. Arizona Geographic Information Council. 1992. Arizona Geographic Information Council (AGIC) Survey of Existing Digital Spatial Data and Future Needs. Phoenix, AZ: Data Management Division, Arizona Department of Administration.
4. Azad, B. and Wiggins, L. L. 1995. Dynamics of inter-organizational geographic data sharing:A conceptual framework for research. In H. J. Onsrud and G. J. Rushton (eds) Sharing Geographic Information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy and Research: 22-43.
5. Bosworth, M., Donovan, J., and Couey, P. 2002. Portland Metro's dream for public involvement. In W. Craig, T. Harris, and D. Weiner (eds) Community Participation and GIS. London: Taylor and Francis, pp. 125-36.
6. Budic, Z. 1994. Effectiveness of geographic information systems in local government planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 244-63.
7. Budic, Z. 1993. GIS use among southeastern local governments. URISA Journal 5(1): 4-17.
8. Campbell, H. J. 1999. Institutional consequences of the use of GIS. In P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, and D. W. Rhind (eds) Geographical Information Systems Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 621-31.
9. Campbell, H. and Masser, I. 1992. GIS in local government: Some findings from Great Britain. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6: 529-46.
10. Campbell, H. and Masser, I. 1995. GIS and Organizations: How Effective are GIS in Practice? London: Taylor and Francis.
11. Chan, T. O. and Williamson, I. P. 1999. The different identities of GIS and GIS diffusion. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13: 267-81.
12. Chrisman, N. R. 1987. Design of geographic systems based on social and cultural goals. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Systems 53: 1367-70.
13. Coffeen, S. 1994. Using GIS to support the "reverse urbanization" process: A case study of the Presidio. URISA Conference Proceedings 9: 517-26.
14. Cook, R. N. and Kennedy, J. L. 1966. Proceedings of the Tri-State Conference on a Comprehensive Unified Land Data System (CULDATA). Cincinnati, OH: College of Law, University of Cincinnati.
15. Cowen, D. J. 1994. The importance of GIS for the average person. In Proceedings of the First Federal Geographic Technology Conference on GIS in Government: The Federal Perspective, Washington DC, USA. Fort Collins, GIS World Books, pp. 7-11.
16. Craglia, M. and Masser, I. 2003. Access to geographic information: A European perspective. URISA Journal 15(1): 51-9.
17. Craig, W. and Johnson, D. 1997. Maximizing GIS benefits to society. Geo Info Systems 7(3):14-8.
18. Craig, W., Harris, T., and Weiner, D. (eds). 2002. Community Participation and GIS. London:Taylor and Francis.
19. Crain, I. K. and MacDonald, C. L. 1984. From land inventory to land management. Cartographica 21: 40-6.
20. Crompvoets, J. and Bregt, A. 2003. World status of national spatial data clearinghouses. URISA Journal 15(1): 43-50.
21. Croswell, P. L. 1989. Facing reality in GIS implementation: Lessons learned and obstacles to be overcome. URISA Conference Proceedings 4: 15-35.
22. Croswell, P. L. 1991. Obstacles to GIS implementation and guidelines to increase the opportunities for success. URISA Journal 3(1): 43-56.
23. Cullis, B. J. 1995. An Exploratory Analysis of Responses to Geographic Information System Adoption on Tri-Service Military Installations. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.
24. Curry, M. R. 1998. Digital Places: Living with Geographic Information Technologies. New York: Routledge.
25. De Man, E. 2003. Cultural and institutional conditions for using geographic information:Access and participation. URISA Journal 15(1): 29-33.
26. Dobson, J. 1983. Automated geography. Professional Geographer 35: 135-43.
27. Dobson, J. 1993. The geographic revolution: A retrospective on the age of automated geography. Professional Geographer 45: 431-9.
28. Dueker, K. J. and Kjerne, D. 1989. Multipurpose cadastre terms and definitions. In Proceedings of the American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, pp. 94-103.
29. Eason, K. 1988. Information Technology and Organisational Change. London: Taylor and Francis.
30. Epstein, E. and Marble, D. (uncredited eds). 2002. Geographic Information Science & Technology in a Changing Society: A Research Definition Workshop. Columbus, OH: Center for Mapping and School of Natural Resources, Ohio State University.
31. Ezigbalike, I., Coleman, D., Cooper, R., and McLaughlin, J. 1988. A land information system development methodology. URISA Conference Proceedings. Bedford Park, IL: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 3: 282-96.
32. FDGC. 1995. Development of a National Digital Geospatial Data Framework. Washington, DC: Federal Geographic Data Committee.
33. FDGC. 1997. Framework Introduction and Guide. Washington, DC: Federal Geographic Data Committee.
34. Foresman, T. W. (ed.). 1997. The History of Geographic Information Systems: Perspectives from the Pioneers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Gillespie, S. R. 1994. Measuring the benefits of GIS use: Two transportation case studies. URISA Journal 6(2): 62-7.
36. GSDI. 2004. Global Spatial Data Infrastructure Newsletter (January 2004). Reston, VA: GSDI Secretariat.
37. Goodchild, M. F. 1997. What next? Reflections from the middle of the growth curve. In T. W. Foresman (ed.) The History of Geographic Information Systems: Perspectives from the Pioneers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall: 369-82.
38. Handy, C. 1993. Understanding Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Hart, D., Koch, T., Moyer, D. D., and Niemann, B. J. 2001. Land Information Modernization Activity in Wisconsin: Impacts, Status and Future Tasks. Madison, WI: Land Information and Computer Graphics Facility, University of Wisconsin-Madison (report to Wisconsin Legislature).
40. Harvey, F. 2001. Constructing GIS: Actor networks of collaboration. URISA Journal 13(1):29-37.
41. Harvey, F. 2003. Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government:The role of trust. Canadian Geographer 47: 28-36.
42. Hissong, F. 2002. The Sisyphean death of the US NSDI: Oh, Prometheus... Prometheus? Earth Observation Magazine 11(11): 31.
43. Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Huxhold, W. E. 1982. An evaluation of the City of Milwaukee automated geographic information and cartographic system in retrospect. In Proceedings of Seminar on Land-Related Information Systems, Municipal/Provincial Integration, Toronto, Canada.
45. Jankowski, P. and Nyerges, T. 2001. Geographic Information Systems for Group Decision Making. London: Taylor and Francis.
46. Jankowski, P. and Nyerges, T. 2003. Toward a framework for research on geographic information-supported participatory decision-making. URISA Journal 15(1): 9-17.
47. Keen, P. 1981. Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM 24: 24-33.
48. Kishor, P., Niemann, B. J., Moyer, D. D., Ventura, S. J., Martin, R. W., and Thum, P. G. 1990. Lessons from CONSOIL: Evaluating GIS/LIS. Wisconsin Land Information Newsletter 6(1): 1-13.
49. Kuhlman, K. and Niemann, B. J. 1993. Modernizing land records: Tracking GIS/LIS technology in Wisconsin and beyond. URISA Journal 7(1): 60-3.
50. Lachman, B., Wong, A., Knopman, D., and Gavin, K. 2002. Lessons for the Global Spatial Data Infrastructure: International Case Study Analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Science and Technology Policy Institute.
51. Larsen, B., Clapp, J., Miller, A. H., Niemann, B. J., and Ziegler, A. L. 1978. Land Records:The Cost to the Citizen to Maintain the Present Land Information Base: A Case Study of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: Department of Administration, Office of Program and Management Analysis.
52. Masser, I. 1998. Governments and Geographic Information. London: Taylor and Francis.
53. Masser, I., Campbell, H., and Craglia, M. (eds). 1996. GIS Diffusion: The Adoption and Use of Geographical Information Systems in Local Government in Europe. London: Taylor and Francis.
54. Masser, I. and Onsrud, H. (eds). 1993. Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
55. Minnesota Governor's Council on Geographic Information. 1994. Minnesota GIS Survey of GIS Organizations, Geographic Data Files, and Data Needs. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Governor's Council on Geographic Information and Minnesota GIS/LIS Consortium.
56. Morton, M. (ed.). 1991. The Corporation of the 1990s: Information Technology and Organizational Transformation. New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Moyer, D. D. 1993. Economics of MPLIS: Concepts and tools. In P. M. Brown and D. D. Moyer (eds). Multipurpose Land Information Systems: The Guidebook. Washington, DC: Federal Geodetic Control Committee 15.1-15.25.
58. NAPA. 1998. Geographic Information for the 21st Century: Building a Strategy for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration.
59. NASA Digital Earth Office. 2000. What is Digital Earth? Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
60. National Research Council. 1980. Need for a Multipurpose Cadastre. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
61. National Research Council. 1983. Procedures and Standards for a Multipurpose Cadastre. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
62. National Research Council. 1993. Toward a Coordinated Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63. National Research Council. 1997. The Future of Spatial Data and Society. Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
64. National Research Council. 2001. National Spatial Data Infrastructure for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
65. National Research Council. 2003. Weaving a National Map: Review of the U.S. Geological Survey Concept of The National Map. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
66. Nebert, D. (ed.). 2001. Developing Spatial Data Infrastructures: The SDI Cookbook Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI), USA, Version 1.1. WWW document, http://www.gsdi.org.
67. Nedovic-Budic, Z. 2002. Geographic Information Partnering. Washington, DC: University Consortium for Geographic Information Science Research Brief (available at http://www.ucgis.org/priorities/research/2002researchPDF/shortterm/m_gi_partnering.pdf).
68. Nedovic-Budic, Z. and Pinto, J. K. 1999. Understanding inter-organizational GIS activities:A conceptual framework. URISA Journal 11(1): 53-64.
69. New Jersey State Mapping Advisory Committee. 1997. New Jersey GIS Resource Guide, 1997. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey State Mapping Advisory Committee (HTML-formatted document distributed on New Jersey Geographic Information System).
70. Niemann, B. J. and Moyer, D. D. (eds). 1988. A Primer on Multipurpose Land Information Systems. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Environmental Studies Report No. 133.
71. Niemann, B. J. and Niemann, S. 1999. Roger F. Tomlinson: The father of GIS. Geo Info Systems 9(3): 40-1, 43-4.
72. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York:Cambridge University Press.
73. Obermeyer, N. J. and Pinto, J. K. 1994. Managing Geographic Information Systems. New York: Guilford.
74. Onsurd, H. J., Calkins, H. W., and Obermeyer, N. J. (eds). 1989. Use and Value of Geographic Information: Initiative Four Specialist Meeting Final Report. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Technical Report.
75. Onsrud, H. J. and Pinto, J. K. 1993. Evaluating correlates of GIS adoption success and the decision process of GIS acquisition. URISA Journal 5(1): 18-39.
76. Onsrud, H. J., Pinto, J. K., and Azad, B. 1992. Case study research methods for geographic information systems. URISA Journal 4(1): 32-44.
77. Onsrud, H. J., Pinto, J. K., and Azad, B. 1993. Testing Technology Transfer Hypotheses in GIS Environments Using a Case Study Approach. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Technical Report No. 93-8.
78. Onsrud, H. J. and Rushton, G. J. (eds). 1995. Sharing Geographic Information. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University.
79. Openshaw, S. 1991. A view on the crisis in geography, or using GIS to put Humpty-Dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A 23: 621-8.
80. Pickles, J. (ed.). 1995. Ground Truth: Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. New York: Guilford.
81. Regional Urban Information System. 1997. RUIS Strategic Plan. San Diego, CA: Regional Urban Information System.
82. Renner, P. J. Y. and Waldon, J. L. 1995. Kentucky Fish and Wildlife Resource Information Management Survey. Frankfort, KY: Kentucky Department Fish and Wildlife Resources.
83. Rogers, E. M. 1993. The diffusion of innovations model. In I. Masser and H. Onsrud (eds) Diffusion and Use of Geographic Information Technologies. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 9-24.
84. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
85. Sandberg, B. 1992. A Geographic Information Systems User Survey: The Emerging GIS Community in Michigan. East Lansing, MI: Center for Remote Sensing, Michigan State University.
86. Sheppard, E. 1995. GIS and society: Towards a research agenda. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 22: 5-16.
87. Sinton, D. 1991. Reflections on 25 years of GIS. GIS World 4: special insert.
88. Smith, N. 1992. History and philosophy of geography: Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography 16: 257-71.
89. Steinitz, C. 1993a. GIS: A personal historical perspective. GIS Europe 2(5): 19-22.
90. Steinitz, C. 1993b. GIS: A personal historical perspective-Part 2: A framework for theory and practice in landscape planning. GIS Europe 2(6): 42-5.
91. Steinitz, C. 1993c. GIS: A personal historical perspective-Part 3: The changing face of GIS from 1965-1993. GIS Europe 2(7): 38-40.
92. Taylor, P. and Overton, M. 1991. Commentary: Further thoughts on geography and GIS. Environment and Planning A 23: 1087-94.
93. Tomlinson, R. 1997. The Canada Geographic Information System. In T. Foresman (ed.) The History of Geographic Information Systems: Perspectives of Pioneers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 21-32.
94. Tosta, N. 1999. NSDI was supposed to be a verb: A personal perspective on progress in the evolution of the U.S. National Spatial Data Infrastructure. In B. Gittings (ed.) Integrating Information Infrastructures with GI Technology. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis, pp. 13-24.
95. Tulloch, D. L. 1999. Theoretical model of multipurpose land information systems development. Transactions in GIS 3: 259-83.
96. Tulloch, D. L. 2002. Institutional aspects of SDIs. Washington, DC: University Consortium of Geographic Information Science Research Brief (available at http://www.ucgis.org/priorities/research/2002researchPDF/shortterm/l_institutional_gis.pdf).
97. Tulloch, D. L. and Epstein, E. F. 2002. Benefits of community MPLIS: Efficiency, effectiveness, and equity. Transactions in GIS 6: 195-212.
98. Tulloch, D. L. and Fuld, J. 2001. County-level production of framework data: Pieces of a National Spatial Data Infrastructure? URISA Journal 13(2): 11-21.
99. Tulloch, D. L. and Niemann, B. J. 1996. Evaluating innovation: The Wisconsin Land Information Program. Geo Info Systems 6(10): 40-4.
100. Tulloch, D. L., Niemann, B. J., Ventura, S. J., and Epstein, E. F. 1996. Measuring GIS/LIS progress in local governments: Land records modernization and its outcomes. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International ESRI User Conference, Palm Springs, CA, USA: CD-ROM.
101. Tulloch, D. L. and Robinson, M. 2000. A progress report on a U.S. national survey of geospatial framework data. Journal of Geographic Information Systems 27: 285-98.
102. Tulloch, D. L. and Shapiro, T. 2003. The intersection of data access and public participation:Impacting GIS users' success? URISA Journal 15(2): 55-60.
103. US Geological Survey. 2001. The National Map: Topographic Mapping for the 21st Century. Reston, VA: Office of the Associate Director for Geography, US Geological Survey.
104. Ventura, S. J. 1995. The use of geographic information systems in local government. Public Administrative Review 55: 461-7.
105. Wisconsin Land Information Board. 1995. 1994 Annual Status Report Survey to the Wisconsin Land Information Board. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Land Information and Computer Graphics Facility.
106. Wunderlich, G. and Moyer, D. D. 1984. Economic features of land information systems. In B. J. Niemann (ed.) Seminar on the Multipurpose Cadastre: Modernizing Land Information Systems in North America. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Institute for Environmental Studies Report No. 123: 183-202.
107. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., and Holbek, J. 1973. Innovations and Organization. New York:John Wiley and Sons.