Critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 79-86

  Ayre, Colin ^a   Scally, Andrew John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

content validity; content validity ratio; measurement; validation design

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890517559     PISSN: 07481756     EISSN: 19476302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0748175613513808     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Armitage P., Berry G., Matthews J. N. S. Statistical methods in medical research. 2002 ). Statistical methods in medical research (4th ed.). Oxford, England: Blackwell. Oxford, England: Blackwell ; 2002:
2. Frank-Stromberg M., Olsen S. J. Instruments for clinical health-care research. London, England: Jones & Bartlett ; 2004:
3. Gallin J. I., Ognibene F. P. Principles and practice of clinical research. 2007 ). Principles and practice of clinical research (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Elsevier. Boston, MA: Elsevier ; 2007:
4. Lawshe C. H.. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology. 1975 ; 28: 563-575
5. Rumsey D. Probability for dummies. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley ; 2006:
6. Wilson F. R., Pan W., Schumsky D. A.. Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe's content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2012 ; 45: 197-210