Preventing irritant contact dermatitis with protective creams: Influence of the application dose

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 19-26

  Schliemann, Sibylle ^a   Petri, Maximilian ^a   Elsner, Peter ^a  

^a JENA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

barrier cream; cumulative irritation; efficacy; occupational dermatitis; prevention; quantity; skin protection cream

Indexed keywords

DODECYL SULFATE SODIUM; SKIN PROTECTIVE AGENT; SODIUM HYDROXIDE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHROMAMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEOMETRY; CREAM; DRUG EFFICACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SKIN FUNCTION; SKIN PROTECTION; SKIN WATER LOSS; VISUAL SCORING;

BARRIER CREAM; CUMULATIVE IRRITATION; EFFICACY; OCCUPATIONAL DERMATITIS; PREVENTION; QUANTITY; SKIN PROTECTION CREAM;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DERMATITIS, OCCUPATIONAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROTECTIVE AGENTS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SKIN CREAM; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890510050     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: 16000536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cod.12104     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wigger-Alberti W, Rougier A, Richard A, Elsner P,. Efficacy of protective creams in a modified repeated irritation test. Methodological aspects. Acta Derm Venereol 1998: 78: 270-273.
2. Frosch P J, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I,. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (II). Ineffectiveness of a popular 'skin protector' against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 74-77.
3. Schluter-Wigger W, Elsner P,. Efficacy of 4 commercially available protective creams in the repetitive irritation test (RIT). Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 278-283.
4. Schliemann S, Petri M, Elsner P,. How much skin protection cream is actually applied in the workplace? Determination of dose per skin surface area in nurses. Contact Dermatitis 2012: 67: 229-233.
5. Tupker R A, Willis C, Berardesca E, Lee C H, Fartasch M, Agner T, Serup J,. Guidelines on sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) exposure tests. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 37: 53-69.
6. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J,. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
7. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J,. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
8. Rougier A, Dupuis D, Lotte C, Roguet R, Wester R C, Maibach H I,. Regional variation in percutaneous absorption in man: measurement by the stripping method. Arch Dermatol Res 1986: 278: 465-469.
9. Fullerton A, Fischer T, Lahti A, Wilhelm K P, Takiwaki H, Serup J,. Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 1-10.
10. O'goshi K, Serup J,. Inter-instrumental variation of skin capacitance measured with the Corneometer. Skin Res Technol 2005: 11: 107-109.
11. COLIPA. International Sun Protection Factor (SPF) Test Method: Brüssel, Colipa, 2006.
12. Frosch P J, Kurte A,. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 31: 161-168.
13. Frosch P J, Kurte A, Pilz B,. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (III). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 113-118.
14. Rieger T, Teichmann A, Richter H, Schanzer S, Sterry W, Lademann J,. Evaluation of barrier creams-introduction and comparison of 3 in vivo methods. Contact Dermatitis 2007: 56: 347-354.
15. Schnetz E, Diepgen T L, Elsner P, et al. Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 336-343.
16. Yokota M, Maibach H I,. Moisturizer effect on irritant dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2006: 55: 65-72.
17. Teichmann A, Jacobi U, Waibler E, Sterry W, Lademann J,. An in vivo model to evaluate the efficacy of barrier creams on the level of skin penetration of chemicals. Contact Dermatitis 2006: 54: 5-13.
18. Caussin J, Gooris G S, Groenink H W, Wiechers J W, Bouwstra J A,. Interaction of lipophilic moisturizers on stratum corneum lipid domains in vitro and in vivo. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2007: 20: 175-186.
19. Held E, Lund H, Agner T,. Effect of different moisturizers on SLS-irritated human skin. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 229-234.
20. Loden M,. Effect of moisturizers on epidermal barrier function. Clin Dermatol 2012: 30: 286-296.
21. Wigger-Alberti W, Maraffio B, Wernli M, Elsner P,. Training workers at risk for occupational contact dermatitis in the application of protective creams: efficacy of a fluorescence technique. Dermatology 1997: 195: 129-133.