Habits of publication and citation by scientific field: Main differences based on jcr journals;Hábitos de publicación y citación según campos científicos: Principales diferencias a partir de las revistas jcr

Revista Espanola de Documentacion Cientifica

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1-14

  Dorta González, Pablo ^a   Dorta González, María Isabel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citation; Citation habits.; Impact factor; JCR journal categories; Journal evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890509793     PISSN: 02100614     EISSN: 19884621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3989/redc.2013.4.1003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Althouse, B. M.; West, J. D.; Bergstrom, C. T.; Bergstrom, T. (2009). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n° 1, 27-34.
2. Bensman, S. J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, v. 41, n° 1, 93-155.
3. Bergstrom, C. (2007). Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College and Research Libraries News, v. 68, n° 5, 314.
4. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviour. Journal of Documentation, v. 64, n° 1, 45-80. Dorta-González, P.; Dorta-González, M. I. (2010). Indicador bibliométrico basado en el índice h. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, v. 33, n° 2, 225-245.
5. Dorta-González, P.; Dorta-González, M. I. (2010). Indicador bibliométrico basado en el índice h. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, v. 33, n° 2, 225-245.
6. Dorta-González, P.; Dorta-González, M. I. (2011a). Aplicación empírica de un indicador bibliométrico basado en el índice h. Cultura y Educación, v. 23, n° 2, 297-313.
7. Dorta-González, P.; Dorta-González, M. I. (2011b). Central indexes to the citation distribution: A complement to the h-index. Scientometrics, v. 88, n° 3, 729-745.
8. Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R. (2002). A general framework for relative impact indicators. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, v. 27, n° 1, 29-48.
9. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, v. 178, n° 4060, 471-479.
10. Garfield, E. (1979a). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in Science, Technology, and Humanities. New York: John Wiley.
11. Garfield, E. (1979b). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?. Scientometrics, v. 1, n° 4, 359-375.
12. González-Pereira, B.; Guerrero-Bote, V. P.; Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n° 3, 379-391.
13. Leydesdorff, L. (2006).: Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, v. 57, n° 5, 601-613.
14. Leydesdorff, L., y Bornmann, L. (2011). How fractional counting of citations affects the Impact Factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, v. 62, n° 2, 217-229.
15. Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T. (2010a). Normalization at the field level: Fractional counting of citations. Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n° 4, 644-646.
16. Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T. (2010b). Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n° 11, 2365-2369.
17. Leydesdorff, L.; Rafols, I. (2011). Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations. Journal of Informetrics, v. 5, n° 1, 87-100.
18. Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n° 3, 265-277.
19. Opthof, T.; Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance, Journal of Informetrics. v. 4, n° 3, 423-430.
20. Pudovkin, A. I.; Garfield, E. (2002). Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 53, n° 13, 1113-1119.
21. Rafols, I.; Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 60, n° 9, 1823-1835.
22. Rosvall, M.; Bergstrom, C. T. (2008). Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 105, n° 4, 1118-1123.
23. Rosvall, M.; Bergstrom, C. T. (2010). Mapping change in large networks. PLoS ONE, v. 5, n° 1, e8694.
24. Van Raan, A. F. J.; Van Leeuwen, T. N.; Visser, M. S.; Van Eck, N. J.; Waltman, L. (2010). Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff. Journal of Informetrics, v. 4, n° 3, 431-435.
25. Wagner, C.; Roessner, J. D.; Bobb, K.; Klein, J.; Boyack, K.; Keyton, J.; Rafols, I.; Börner, K. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature, Journal of Informetrics, v. 5, n° 1, 14-26
26. Waltman, L.; Van Eck, N. J. (2010). The relation between Eigenfactor, Audience Factor, and Influence Weight. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n° 7, 1476-1486.
27. Waltman, L.; Yan, E.; Van Eck, N. J. (2011). A recursive field-normalized bibliometric performance indicator: An application to the field of library and information science. Scientometrics, v. 89, n° 1, 301-314.
28. Zitt, M.; Small, H. (2008): Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n° 11, 1856-1860.