Sustainable urban mobility: A comparative study and the basis for a management system in Brazil and Portugal

WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

Volumn 77, Issue , 2005, Pages 323-332

  Costa, M S ^a   Silva, A N R ^a   Ramos, R A R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Brazilian cities; Mobility indicators; Multicriteria analysis; Portuguese cities; Urban sustainable mobility

Indexed keywords

BRAZILIAN CITIES; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES; MULTI CRITERIA ANALYSIS; PORTUGUESE CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS; SUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLES; SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY;

URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84890508637     PISSN: 17433509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Lautso, K., The SPARTACUS approach to assessing urban sustainability. Indicators for Sustainable Development, ed. D. Boyd &T. Deelstra. Proc. of the Advanced Study Course. The International institute for the urban environment: Netherlands, 1998.
2. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Working Group on the State of the Environment. Indicators for the integration of environmental concerns into transport policies. http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/ 1998doc.nsf/LinkTo/ENV-EPOC-SE(98)1- FINAL.
3. European Environment Agency (EEA). Indicators of transport and environment integration (TERM). Copenhagen, Denmark. http://themes.eea.eu.int/ Sectors-and-activities/transport/indicators.
4. Costa, M.S., Mobilidade urbana sustentável: um estudo comparativo e as bases de um sistema de gestão para Brasil e Portugal. Universidade de São Paulo, 2003.
5. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). Caracterização e tendências da rede urbana do Brasil. Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil, 1999.
6. Instituto Nacional de EstatÍstica (INE). Atlas das cidades de Portugal. Lisboa, Portugal, 2002.
7. Associação Nacional de Transportes Públicos (ANTP). Mobilidade e Cidadania. São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil, 2003.
8. Greene, D., Wegener, M., Sustainable transport. Journal Transport Geography, 5(3), pp.177-190, 1997.
9. Gudmundsson, H., Hojer, M., Sustainable development principles and their implications for transport. Ecological Economics, 19, pp. 269-282, 1996.
10. Moore, J.A., Johnson, J.M., Transportation, land use and sustainability. Florida Center for Community Design and Research. http://www. fccdr.usf.edu/projects/tlushtml.
11. Word Bank, Sustainable transport: priorities for policy reform. Washington DC, 1996.
12. Saaty, T.L., A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 13(3), pp. 234-281, 1977.
13. Saaty, T.L., The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw Hill: New York, 1980.
14. Saaty, T.L., Concepts, theory and techniques: rank generation, preservation, and reversal in the analytic decision process. Decision Sciences, 18(2), pp.157-177, 1987.
15. Forman, E., Selly, M.A., Decision by objectives: how to convince others that you are right. http://www.expertchoice.com/dbo.