Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle systems with respect to their magnetic particle imaging performance

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 58, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 535-545

  Ludwig, Frank ^a   Eberbeck, Dietmar ^b   Löwa, Norbert ^b   Steinhoff, Uwe ^b   Wawrzik, Thilo ^a   Schilling, Meinhard ^a   Trahms, Lutz ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

Author keywords

magnetic characterization; magnetic nanoparticles; MPI

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC MAGNETIC BEHAVIOR; MAGNETIC CHARACTERIZATION; MAGNETIC NANO-PARTICLES; MAGNETIC NANOPARTI CLES (MNPS); MAGNETIC PARTICLE SPECTROSCOPY (MPS); MPI; STRAIGHTFORWARD TECHNIQUES; STRUCTURAL AND MAGNETIC PROPERTIES;

CHARACTERIZATION; MAGNETIC PROPERTIES; NANOPARTICLES;

MAGNETISM;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DEXTRAN; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE;

CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DEXTRANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84890480805     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2013-0013     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Adolphi NL, Huber DL, Bryant HC, et al. Characterization of single-core magnetite nanoparticles for magnetic imaging by SQUID magnetorelaxometry. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 5985-6003.
2. Ahrentrop F, Astalan AP, Jonasson C, et al. Sensitive high frequency ac susceptometry in magnetic nanoparticle applications. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1311: 213-223.
3. Berkov DV, Gornert P, Buske N, et al. New method for the determination of the particle magnetic moment distribution in a ferrofluid. J Phys D Appl Phys 2000; 33: 331-337.
4. Biederer S, Knopp T, Sattel TF, et al. Magnetization response spectroscopy of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging. J Phys D Appl Phys 2009; 42: 205007-17.
5. Briehl A, Gleich B, Weizenecker J, et al. Compositions containing magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and use of said compositions in imaging methods. US 2007/0036729 A1 (15.02.2007).
6. Chantrell RW, Hoon SR, Tanner BK. Time-dependent magnetization in fine-particle ferromagnetic systems. J Magn Magn Mater 1983; 38: 133-141.
7. Chantrell RW, Popplewell J, Charles SW. Measurements of particle size distribution parameters in ferrofluids. IEEE Trans Mag 1978; MAG14: 975-977.
8. Chung SH, Hoffmann A, Kuslienko K, et al. Biological sensing with magnetic nanoparticles using Brownian relaxation. J Appl Phys 2005; 97: 10R101-15.
9. Debye P. Polar molecules. New York: Chemical Catalog Company 1929.
10. Drung D. High-performance dc SQUID read-out electronics. Physica C 2002; 368: 134-140.
11. Eberbeck D, Bergemann C, Hartwig S, Steinhoff U, Trahms L. Binding kinetics of magnetic nanoparticles on latex beads andyeast cells studied by magnetorelaxometry. J Magnet Magn Mat 2005; 289: 435-438.
12. Eberbeck D, Trahms L, Kratz H. Evaluation of different magnetic particle systems with respect to its MPI performance. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 53-57.
13. Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Steinhoff U, Trahms L. Aggregation behaviour of magnetic nanoparticle suspensions investigated by magnetorelaxometry. J Phys D: Appl Phys 2006; 18: S2829-S2846.
14. Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Trahms L. Evidence of aggregates of magnetic nanoparticles in suspensions which determine the magnetization behavior. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 66-72.
15. Eberbeck D, Wiekhorst F, Wagner S, Trahms L. How size distribution of magnetic nanoparticles determines their magnetic particle imaging performance. Appl Phys Lett 2011; 98: 182502-13.
16. Ferguson RM, Khandhar AP, Krishnan KM. Tracer design for magnetic particle imaging. J Appl Phys 2012; 111: 07B318-15.
17. Ferguson RM, Minard KR, Khandhar AP, Krishnan KM. Optimizing magnetic nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging. Med Phys 2011; 38: 1619-1626.
18. Gehrke N, Briel A, Ludwig F, Remmer H, Wawrzik T, Wellert S. New perspectives for MPI: a toolbox for tracer research. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 99-103.
19. Gleich B, Weizenecker J. Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles. Nature 2005; 435: 1214-1217.
20. Goodwill PW, Conolly SM. Multidimensional X-space magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011; 30: 1581-1590.
21. Lowa N, Eberbeck D, Steinhoff U, Wiekhorst F, Trahms L. Potential of improving MPI performance by magnetic separation. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 73-78.
22. Ludwig F. Characterization of magnetic core-shell nanoparticle suspensions using ac susceptibility for frequencies up to 1 MHz. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1311: 249-254.
23. Ludwig F, Guillaume A, Schilling M, Frickel N, Schmidt AM. Determination of core and hydrodynamic size distributions of CoFe2O4 nanoparticle suspensions using ac susceptibility measurements. J Appl Phys 2010; 108: 033918-15.
24. Ludwig F, Heim E, Schilling M. Characterization of superparamagnetic nanoparticles by analyzing the magnetization and relaxation dynamics using fluxgate magnetometers. J Appl Phys 2007; 101: 113909-110.
25. Ludwig F, Heim E, Schilling M. Characterization of magnetic core-shell nanoparticles by fluxgate magnetorelaxometry, ac susceptibility, transmission electron microscopy and photon correlation spectroscopy - a comparative study. J Magn Magn Mater 2009; 321: 1644-1647.
26. Ludwig F, Wawrzik T, Schilling M. Characterization of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging by magnetorelaxometry, ac susceptibility, magnetic particle spectroscopy and static magnetization measurements. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 35-40.
27. Ludwig F, Wawrzik T, Yoshida T, et al. Optimization of magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans Magn 2012; 48: 3780-3783.
28. Rahmer J, Gleich B, Bontus C, et al. Rapid 3d in vivo magnetic particle imaging with a large field of view. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2011; 19: 3285.
29. Rauwerdink AM, Weaver JB. Viscous effects on nanoparticle magnetization harmonics. J Magn Magn Mater 2010; 322: 609-613.
30. Rosensweig RE. Ferrohydrodynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press 1985.
31. Rosensweig RE. Heating magnetic fluid with alternating magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 2002; 252: 370-374.
32. Schilling M, Ludwig F, Kuhlmann C, Wawrzik T. 3D Magnetic particle imaging-scanner with 10 kHz drive-field frequency. This issue.
33. Warzemann L, Schambach J, Weber P, Weitschies W, Kotitz R. LTS SQUID gradiometer system for in vivo magnetorelaxometry. Supercond Sci Technol 1999; 12: 953-955.
34. Wawrzik T, Kuhlmann C, Ludwig F, Schilling M. Scanner setup and reconstruction for three-dimensional magnetic particle imaging. Proc SPIE 8672, Medical Imaging 2013: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging (March 29, 2013). DOI:10.1117/12.2006392.
35. Wawrzik T, Ludwig F, Schilling M. Multivariate magnetic particle spectroscopy for magnetic nanoparticle characterization. AIP Conf Proc 2010; 1311: 267-270.
36. Wawrzik T, Ludwig F, Schilling M. Magnetic particle imaging: exploring particle mobility. In: Buzug TM, Borgert J, editors. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel SPIO nanoparticle imaging technique. Springer Proc Phys 2012; 140: 21-26.
37. Wawrzik T, Schilling M, Ludwig F. Perspectives of magnetic particle spectroscopy for magnetic nanoparticle characterization. In: Buzug TM, Borgert J, editors. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel SPIO nanoparticle imaging technique. Springer Proceedings in Physics 2012; 140: 41-46.
38. Weitschies W, Kotitz R, Bunte T, Trahms L. Determination of relaxing or remanent nanoparticle magnetization provides a novel binding-specific technique for the evaluation of immunoassays. Pharm Pharmacol Lett 1997; 7: 5-8.
39. Weizenecker J, Gleich B, Rahmer J, Borgert J. Particle dynamics of mono-domain particles in magnetic particle imaging. In: Magnetic nanoparticles: particle science, imaging technology, and clinical applications. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd 2010: 3-15.
40. Weizenecker J, Gleich B, Rahmer J, Dahnke H, Borgert J. Threedimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging. Phys Med Biol 1009; 54: L1-L10.
41. Wiekhorst F, Steinhoff U, Eberbeck D, Trahms L. Magnetorelaxometry assisted biomedical applications of magnetic nanoparticles. Pharm Res 2012; 29: 1189-1202.
42. Yoshida T, Enpuku K, Ludwig F, et al. Characterization of Resovist for magnetic particle imaging. In: Buzug TM, Borgert J, editors. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel SPIO nanoparticle imaging technique. Springer Proceedings in Physics 2012; 140: 3-7.
43. Yoshida T, Enpuku K. Simulation and quantitative clarification of ac susceptibility of magnetic fluid in nonlinear Brownian relaxation region. Japan J Appl Phys 2009; 48: 127002-1-7.