Assessment of sign retroreflectivity compliance for development of a management plan

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2272, 2012, Pages 103-112

  Evans, Travis ^a   Heaslip, Kevin ^a   Boggs, Wesley ^a   Hurwitz, David ^b   Gardiner, Kevin ^a  

^a Utah State University   (United States)

^b Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSET MANAGEMENT; BUDGET CONTROL; COMPLIANCE CONTROL; DATA ACQUISITION; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; SITE SELECTION;

ASSESSMENT PLAN; ASSETS MANAGEMENT; COLLECTION EFFORT; CONDITION; DATA COLLECTION; MANAGEMENT PLANS; MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES; PERFORMANCE; TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES; UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONS;

TRAFFIC SIGNS;

EID: 84890479750     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2272-12     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices./FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2009.
2. Kirk, A. R., E. A. Hunt, and E. W. Brooks. Factors Affecting Sign Retroreflectivity./Report OR-RD-01-09. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2001.
3. Bischoff, A., and D. Bullock. Sign Retroreflectivity Study./FHWA/IN/JTRP- 2002/22. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., 2002.
4. Immaneni, V. P. K., J. E. Hummer, W. J. Rasdorf, E. A. Harris, and C. Yeom. Synthesis of Sign Deterioration Rates Across the United States. Journal of Transportation Engineering/, Vol. 135, No. 3, 2009, pp. 94-103.
5. Vereen, S. C., J. E. Hummer, and W. J. Rasdorf. A Sign Inventory Study to Assess and Control Liability and Cost./FHWA/NC/2002-017. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 2002.
6. Wolshon, B. Louisiana Traffic Sign Inventory and Management System. Report No. 381. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 2003.
7. Hulme, E. A., S. M. L. Hubbard, G. D. Farnsworth, A. M. Hainen, S. M. Remias, and D. M. Bullock. An Asset Management Framework for Addressing the New MUTCD Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity Standards. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
8. Re, J. M., J. D. Miles, and P. J. Carlson. Analysis of In-Service Traffic Sign Retroreflectivity and Deterioration Rates in Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2258/, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 88-94.
9. Ellison, J. W. Tapping into the Power of a Traffic Sign Inventory to Meet the New Retroreflectivity Requirements. Compendium of Technical Papers./Institute of Transportation Engineers, Anaheim, Calif., 2008.
10. Rogoff, M. J., A. S. Rodriguez, and M. B. McCarthy. Using Retroreflectivity Measurements to Assist in the Development of a Local Traffic Sign Management Program. ITE Journal/, Vol. 75, No. 10, 2005, pp. 28-32. (Pubitemid 41520442)
11. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., PB Consult, Inc., and Texas Transportation Institute. NCHRP Report 551: Performance Measures and Targets for Transportation Asset Management./Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006.
12. 2011 Traffic Sign Retroreflective Sheeting Identification Guide./FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011. http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway- dept/night-visib/sign-visib/sheetguide/sheetguide.pdf