A dynamic system model of time-varying subjective quality of video streams over HTTP

ICASSP, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 3602-3606

  Chen, Chao ^a   Choi, Lark Kwon ^a   De Veciana, Gustavo ^a   Caramanis, Constantine ^a   Heath Jr , Robert W ^a   Bovik, Alan C ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

HTTP based streaming; QoE; Time varying subjective quality

Indexed keywords

CHANNEL CONDITIONS; DYNAMIC SYSTEM MODELING; HTTP-BASED VIDEO STREAMING; QOE; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); RATE-ADAPTATION; STREAMING ALGORITHM; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY;

FORECASTING; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VIDEO STREAMING;

HTTP;

EID: 84890462158     PISSN: 15206149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638329     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Microsoft Corporation, "lIS smooth streaming technical overview," http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/default. aspx, Sept. 2009.
2. R. Pantos and E. W. May, "HTTP live streaming," IETF Internet Draft, work in progress, Mar. 2011.
3. Adobe Systems, "HTTP dynamics streaming," http://www. adobe.com/products/hds-dynamic-streaming.html, Mar. 20 12.
4. MPEG Requirements Group, "ISO/IEC FCD 2300 1-6 Part 6: Dynamics adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH)," http ://mpeg.chiariglione.org/ working.documents/mpeg-b/ dash/dash-dis.zip, Jan. 2011.
5. K. Seshadri nathan and A. C. Bovik, "Motion-tuned spatiotemporal quality assessment of natural videos," IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 335-350, Feb. 2010.
6. M. Zink, O. Kilnzel, J. Schmitt, and R. Steinmetz, "Subjective impression of variations in layer encoded videos," in 11th Int'l Wkshp Qual Servo Springer, 2003, pp. l 37-154.
7. Z. Wang, E. P. Simoncelli, and A. C. Bovik, "Multi scale structural similarity for image quality assessment," in ThirtySeventh Asilomar Con1on Signals, Syst, and Comput, vol. 2, Nov. 2003, pp. 1398-1402.
8. M. H. Pinson and S. Wolf, "A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality," IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 3 12-322, Sept. 2004.
9. P. V. Vu, C. T. Vu, and D. M. Chandler, "A spatiotemporal most-apparent-distortion model for video quality assessment," in 18th IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Process. (IC/P), Sept. 2011, pp. 2505-2508.
10. R. Soundararajan and A. C. Bovik, "Video quality assessment by reduced reference spatio-temporal entropic differencing," IEEE Trans. Circ. Sys. Video Techno1., to appear, 2012.
11. D. E. Pearson, "Viewer response t o time-varying video quality," Proc. SPIE, vol. 3299, no. 1, 1998.
12. K. T. Tan, M. Ghanbari, and D. E. Pearson, "An objective measurement tool for MPEG video quality," Signal Process., vol. 70, pp. 279-294, July 1998.
13. M. A. Masry and S. S. Hemami, "A metric for the continuous quality evaluation of video with severe distortions," lournal of Signal Process. Image Commun., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 13 3-146, Feb. 2004.
14. M. Barkowsky, B. Eskofier, R. Bitto, J. Bialkowski, and A. Kaup, "Perceptually motivated spatial and temporal integration of pixel based video quality measures," in Welcome to Mobile Content Quality of Experience, Mar. 2007, pp. 1-7.
15. K. Seshadri nathan and A. C. Bovik, "Temporal hysteresis model of time-varying subjective video quality," in IEEE Int'l Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., May. 2011.
16. P. Le Callet, C. Viard-Gaudin, and D. Barba, "A convolutional neural network approach for objective video quality assessment," IEEE Trans. Neural Net., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. l 3 16-l 327, Sept. 2006.
17. ITU-R Recommendation BT.500-13, "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," http://www.itu.intldms. pubrec/itu-r/rec/btiR-REC-BT. 500-l 3-20 120 1-111PDF-E.pdf, Jan. 2012.
18. A. Moorthy, L. Choi, A. C. Bovik, and G. d e Veciana, "Video quality assessment on mobile devices : subjective, behavioral and objective studies," IEEE Select. Topics Signal Process., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 652-67 1, Oct. 2012.
19. Center for Perceptual Systems, The University of Texas at Austin, "The XGL Toolbox," http://svi.cps.utexas.edu/ software.shtml, 2012.
20. L. Ljung, System Identification: Theory for the User. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1986.
21. J. A. Neider, "The fitting of a generalization of the logistic curve," Biometrics, vol. 17, no. I, pp. pp. 89-110, 19 6 1.
22. A. Barron, J. Rissanen, and B. Yu, "The minimum description length principle in coding and modeling," IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2743-2760, Oct. 1998.