Patterns of practice: a reflection on the development of quantitative/mixed methodologies capturing everyday life related to water consumption in the UK

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 27-43

  Browne, Alison Leigh ^a   Pullinger, Martin ^b   Medd, Will ^c   Anderson, Ben ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cluster analysis; consumption; everyday practice; mixed methodology; practice theory; surveys; water

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890439661     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2014.854012     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alasuutari, P. (2009). The rise and relevance of qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 139-155.
2. Aldenderfer, M. S. R., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. London: Sage.
3. Alvesson, H. M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
4. Blaikie, N. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality & Quantity, 25, 115-136.
5. Boroughs, M., Cafri, G., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). Male body depilation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles, 52, 637-644.
6. Browne, A. L., Medd, W., & Anderson, B. (2013). Developing novel approaches to tracking domestic water demand under uncertainty - A reflection on the 'up scaling' of social science approaches in the United Kingdom. Water Resources Management, 27, 1013-1036.
7. Browne, A. L., Pullinger, M., Anderson, B., & Medd, W. (2013). The performance of practice: An alternative approach to attitudinal and behavioural 'customer segmentation' for the UK water industry. SPRG Discussion Paper 5. The University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://www.sprg.ac.uk/uploads/sprg-discussion-paper-5.pdf
8. Bryne, D. (2002). Interpreting quantitative data. London: Sage.
9. Callegaro, F. (2012). Having social practices in mind. Wittgenstein's anthropological pragmatism in perspective. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 2, 158-173.
10. Chappells, H., Medd, W., & Shove, E. (2011). Disruption and change: Drought and the inconspicuous dynamics of garden lives. Social & Cultural Geography, 12, 701-715.
11. DEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs). (2008). A framework for pro-environmental behaviours (Report). London: Author.
12. Doyle, R., & Davies, A. (2012). Transition framework: Towards future practices of sustainable washing (Consensus Report). Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
13. Fuller, C. (2013). Urban politics and the social practices of critique and justification: Conceptual insights from French pragmatism. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 639-657.
14. Gimmler, A. (2012). Pragmatisme og 'practice turn'. Slagmark, 64, 43-58. Retrieved from http://www.nordprag.org/papers/epc1/Gimmler.pdf
15. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2008). Consuming technologies - Developing routines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1181-1189.
16. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2010). Standby consumption in households analyzed with a practice theory approach. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14, 150-165.
17. Gram-Hanssen, K. (2011). Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 61-78.
18. Halkier, B., Katz-Gerro, T., & Marteens, L. (2011). Applying practice theory to the study of consumption: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 3-13.
19. Hammersley, M. (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 22-36). London: Sage.
20. Hand, M., Shove, E., & Southerton, D. (2005). Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice. Sociological Research Online, 10. Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/hand.html
21. Hitchings, R. (2012). People can talk about their practices. Area, 44, 61-67.
22. Holttinen, H. (2010). Social practices as units of value creation: Theoretical underpinnings and implications. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2, 95-112.
23. Kuijer, L., & De Jong, A. (2011). Practice theory and human-centered design: A sustainable bathing example. Paper presented at the Nordes 2011. School of Art and Design, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.
24. Kuijer, L., & De Jong, A. (2012). Identifying opportunities for reduced household resource consumption: Exploring practices of thermal comfort. Journal of Design Research, 10, 67-85.
25. Kuijer, L., McHardy, J., & Scott, K. (2010). The challenge of the bucket wash: Creating desirable sustainable practices. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Design & Emotion, IIT Institute of Design, Chicago.
26. May, C. (2005). Methodological pluralism, British sociology and the evidence-based state. Sociology, 39, 519-528.
27. Medd, W., & Chappells, H. (2007). Drought, demand and the scale of resilience: Challenges for interdisciplinarity in practice. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32, 233-248.
28. Medd, W., & Chappells, H. (2008). Drought and demand in 2006: Consumers, water companies and regulators (Final Report). Lancaster: Lancaster University.
29. Medd, W., & Shove, E. (2006). The sociology of water use. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
30. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 375-387. doi:10.1080/13645570500402447
31. Payne, G., Williams, M., & Chamberlain, S. (2005). Methodological pluralism, British sociology and the evidence-based state. Sociology, 39, 529-533.
32. Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life: Practices and places. London: Sage.
33. Platt, J. (2012). Making them count: How effective has official encouragement of quantitative methods been in British sociology? Current Sociology, 60, 690-704.
34. Pompper, D. (2010). Masculinities, the metrosexual, and media images: Across dimensions of age and ethnicity. Sex Roles, 63, 682-696.
35. Poon, J. P. H. (2005). Quantitative methods: Not positively positivist. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 766-772.
36. Pullinger, M., Browne, A. L., Medd, W., & Anderson, B. (2013). Patterns of practice: Laundry, bathroom and gardening practices of households in England influencing water consumption and demand management. Lancaster: Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University.
37. Punj, G., & Steward, D. W. (1983). Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research, 20, 134-148.
38. Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sharp, L., McDonald, A. T., Sim, P., Knamiller, C., Sefton, C., & Wong, S. (2011). Positivism, post-positivism and domestic water demand: Interrelating science across the paradigmatic divide. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36, 501-515.
40. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience. Oxford: Berg.
41. Shove, E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1273-1285.
42. Shove, E. (2011). On the difference between chalk and cheese-a response to Whitmarsh et al.'s comments on 'beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change'. Environment and Planning A, 43, 262-264.
43. Shove, E., & Pantzar, M. (2005). Consumers, producers and practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 43-64.
44. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
45. Shugart, H. (2008). Managing masculinities: The metrosexual moment. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 5, 280-300. doi:10.1080/14791420802206833
46. Simpson, B. (2009). Pragmatism, mead and the practice turn. Organization Studies, 30, 1329-1347.
47. Simpson, P. (2011). 'So, as you can see': Some reflections on the utility of video methodologies in the study of embodied practices. Area, 43, 343-352.
48. Sofoulis, Z. (2005). Big water, everyday water: A sociotechnical perspective. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 19, 445-463.
49. Sofoulis, Z. (2011). Skirting complexity: The retarding quest for the average water user. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 25, 795-810.
50. Spinney, J. (2009). Cycling the city: Movement, meaning and method. Geography Compass, 3, 817-835.
51. Strengers, Y. (2009). Bridging the divide between resource management and everyday life: Smart metering, comfort and cleanliness. Melbourne: RMIT.
52. Strengers, Y. (2011a). Beyond demand management: Co-managing energy and water practices with Australian households. Policy Studies, 32, 35-58.
53. Strengers, Y. (2011b). Negotiating everyday life: The role of energy and water consumption feedback. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11, 319-338.
54. Strengers, Y., & Maller, C. J. (in press). Materialising energy and water resources in everyday practices: Insights for securing supply systems. Global Environmental Change. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.004
55. Trentmann, F. (2011). Liquid politics: Water and the politics of everyday life in the modern city. Past and Present, 211, 199-241.
56. Trentmann, F., & Taylor, V. (2006). From users to consumers: Water politics in nineteenth-century London. In F. Trentmann (Ed.), The making of the consumer: Knowledge, power and identity in the modern world (pp. 53-79). Oxford: Berg.
57. Uprichard, E., Burrows, R., & Byrne, D. (2008). SPSS as an 'inscription device': From causality to description? The Sociological Review, 56, 606-622.
58. Vyncke, P. (2002). Lifestyle segmentation: From attitudes, interests and opinions, to values, aesthetic styles, life visions and media preferences. European Journal of Communication, 17, 445-463.
59. Warde, A., Cheng, S.-L., Olsen, W., & Southerton, D. (2007). Changes in the practice of eating: A comparative analysis of time-use. Acta Sociologica, 50, 363-385.
60. Warde, A., & Southerton, D. (Eds.). (2012). 'The habits of consumption'. COLLeGIUM of Studies Across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 12. Retrieved from http://www.helsinki.fi/collegium/e-series/volumes/volume_12/index.htm]
61. Waterwise. (2009). Evaluation of the water saving potential of social housing stock in the greater London area (Report prepared for the Greater London Authority). London: Author.
62. Waterwise. (2011). Evidence base for large-scale water efficiency Phase II final report. London: Author.
63. Whitmarsh, L., O'Neill, S., & Lorenzoni, I. (2011). Climate change or social change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond disciplines. Environment and Planning A, 43, 258-261.
64. Williams, M., Payne, G., Hodgkinson, L., & Poade, D. (2008). Does British sociology count? Sociology, 42, 1003-1021.
65. Wilson, C., & Chatterton, T. (2011). Multiple models to inform climate change policy: A pragmatic response to the 'beyond the ABC' debate. Environment and Planning A, 43, 2781-2787.