Failure mode and effect analysis in blood transfusion: A proactive tool to reduce risks

Transfusion

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3080-3087

  Lu, Yao ^a   Teng, Fang ^a   Zhou, Jie ^a   Wen, Aiqing ^b   Bi, Yutian ^a  

^a THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b THIRD MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION REACTION; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PLASMA; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; TREATMENT FAILURE;

BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84890437814     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12174     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Callum JL, Kaplan HS, Merkley LL, Pinkerton PH, Fastman BR, Romans RA, Coovadia AS, Reis MD,. Reporting of near-miss events for transfusion medicine: improving transfusion safety. Transfusion 2001; 41: 1204-1211.
2. Slonim AD, Bish EK, Xie RS,. Red blood cell transfusion safety: probabilistic risk assessment and cost/benefits of risk reduction strategies. Ann Oper Res 2011 July. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1007/s10479-011-0925-0
3. Paparella S,. Failure mode and effects analysis: a useful tool for risk identification and injury prevention. J Emerg Nurs 2007; 33: 367-371.
4. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2002. p. 85.
5. Chiozza ML, Ponzetti C,. FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors. Clin Chim Acta 2009; 404: 75-78.
6. Burgmeier J,. Failure mode and effect analysis: an application in reducing risk in blood transfusion. J Qual Improv 2002; 28: 331-339.
7. Woodhouse S,. Engineering for safety: use of failure mode and effects analysis in the laboratory. Lab Med 2005; 36: 16-18.
8. Stanton JE, Korus G, Israelite CL, Fogt F,. Prospective risk assessment and intervention to reduce blood transfusion errors. J Clin Outcomes Manag 2007; 14: 441-446.
9. Wang D, Pan J,. An optimization to automatic fault tree analysis and failure mode and effect analysis approaches for processes. Int Conf Comput Des Appl 2010; 3: 153-157.
10. Henneman EA, Avrunin GS, Clarke LA, Osterweil LJ, Andrzejewski C, Merrigan K, Cobleigh R, Frederick K, Katz-Bassett E, Henneman PL,. Increasing patient safety and efficiency in transfusion therapy using formal process definitions. Transfus Med Rev 2007; 21: 49-57.
11. Han TH, Kim MJ, Kim S, Kim HO, Lee MA, Choi JS, Hur M, St John A,. The role of failure modes and effects analysis in showing the benefits of automation in the blood bank. Transfusion 2013; 53: 1077-1082
12. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations. Performance improvement. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations; 2001. p. 200-201.
13. Johnson CN,. The benefit of PDCA. Qual Prog 2002; 35: 120-121.
14. Ashley L, Armitage G, Neary M, Hollingsworth G,. A practical guide to failure mode and effects analysis in health care: making the most of the team and its meetings. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36: 351-386.
15. Wetterneck TB, Hundt AS, Carayon P,. FMEA team performance in health care: a qualitative analysis of team member perceptions. J Patient Saf 2009; 5: 102-108.