CORR insights®: Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 3996-3997

  Blumenfeld, Thomas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NOTE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RANGE OF MOTION; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84890434937     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3283-1     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, Ford AD, Foreman K, Nunley RM. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:95-99.
2. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA. Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Ortho Rel Res. 1985;192:23-33.
3. Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2143-2149.