Early experience with robotic rectopexy

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Buchs, Nicolas C ^a   Pugin, François ^a   Ris, Frederic ^a   Volonte, Francesco ^a   Morel, Philippe ^a   Roche, Bruno ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Rectopexy; Robot; Technique

Indexed keywords

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

BLOOD LOSS; COLORECTAL SURGERY; ETHICS COMMITTEE; INTUITIVE SURGICAL; LONG-TERM OUTCOME; MEDICAL HISTORY; NO CONVERSION; RECTOPEXY; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; TECHNIQUE;

LAPAROSCOPY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE COURSE; FEMALE; HEMATOMA; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL HISTORY; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCTOPEXY; RECTUM DISEASE; RECTUM PROLAPSE; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETRORECTAL HEMATOMA; ROBOTIC RECTOPEXY; ROBOTICS;

LAPAROSCOPY; RECTOPEXY; ROBOT; TECHNIQUE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPES; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; RECTAL PROLAPSE; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE PROLAPSE;

EID: 84890429252     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1498     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. World J Surg 2011; 35(12): 2739-2746.
2. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery 2011; 149(1): 29-39.
3. Pigazzi A, Garcia-Aguilar J. Robotic colorectal surgery: for whom and for what? Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53(7): 969-970.
4. Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2010; 252(2): 254-262.
5. Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, et al. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27(2): 233-241.
6. Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16(6): 1480-1487.
7. Ortiz-Oshiro E, Sanchez-Egido I, Moreno-Sierra J, et al. Robotic assistance may reduce conversion to open in rectal carcinoma laparoscopic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 2012; 8(3): 360-370.
8. Munz Y, Moorthy K, Kudchadkar R, et al. Robotic assisted rectopexy. Am J Surg 2004; 187(1): 88-92.
9. Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA. The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77(1): 49-70.
10. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002; 89(1): 35-39.
11. Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection. Rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38(2): 199-201.
12. Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 2006; 20(1): 35-42.
13. Ayav A, Bresler L, Hubert J, et al. Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Surg Endosc 2005; 19(9): 1200-1203.
14. de Hoog DE, Heemskerk J, Nieman FH, et al. Recurrence and functional results after open versus conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24(10): 1201-1206.
15. Heemskerk J, de Hoog DE, van Gemert WG, et al. Robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50(11): 1825-1830.
16. Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54(3): 342-346.
17. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Morel P. Totally robotic right colectomy: a preliminary case series and an overview of the literature. Int J Med Robot 2011 Jun 15. doi: 10.1002/rcs.404. [Epub ahead of print].
18. Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2012; 22(1): 52-61.
19. Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, et al. Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2011; 15(12): 2182-2186.
20. Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for b_k;robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(4): 1116-1121.
21. Moreno Sierra J, Ortiz Oshiro E, Fernandez Perez C, et al. Long-term outcomes after robotic sacrocolpopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: prospective analysis. Urol Int 2011; 86(4): 414-418.