Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Automated Contrast Injection Devices Versus Manual Injection and Contrast Volume on Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 49-53

  Minsinger, Kristopher D ^a   Kassis, Hayah M ^b   Block, Clay A ^b   Sidhu, Mandeep ^b,c   Brown, Jeremiah R ^a,b,c  

^a DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED CONTRAST INJECTION; AUTOMATED CONTRAST INJECTOR; CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; CONTRAST RADIOGRAPHY; DRUG INJECTION VOLUME; DRUG SAFETY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY ANGIOGRAPHY; MANUAL CONTRAST INJECTION; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INJECTIONS; KIDNEY DISEASES; RISK FACTORS; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 84890428549     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: 18791913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.08.040     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. G. Anne, L. Gruberg, A. Huber, E. Nikolsky, E. Grenadier, M. Boulus, S. Amikam, W. Markiewicz, and R. Beyar Traditional versus automated injection contrast system in diagnostic and percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: comparison of the contrast volume delivered J Invasive Cardiol 16 2004 360 362
2. D. Brosh, A. Assali, H. Vaknin-Assa, S. Fuchs, I. Teplitsky, N. Shor, and R. Kornowski The ACIST power injection system reduces the amount of contrast media delivered to the patient, as well as fluoroscopy time, during diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 7 2005 183 187
3. J. Call, M. Sacrinty, R. Applegate, W. Little, R. Santos, T. Baki, S. Gandhi, F. Kahl, and M. Kutcher Automated contrast injection in contemporary practice during cardiac catheterization and PCI: effects on contrast-induced nephropathy J Invasive Cardiol 18 2006 469 474
4. G. Chahoud, S. Khoukaz, A. El-Shafei, E. Azrak, S. Bitar, and M.J. Kern Randomized comparison of coronary angiography using 4F catheters: 4F manual versus "Acisted" power injection technique Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53 2001 221 224
5. H.S. Gurm, D. Smith, D. Share, D. Wohns, J. Collins, M. Madala, S. Koneru, D. Menees, and S. Chetcuti Impact of automated contrast injector systems on contrast use and contrast-associated complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6 2013 399 405
6. L. Hou, Y.D. Wei, J. Song, W.L. Che, W.H. Peng, Y. Wang, W.M. Li, Y.W. Xu, and D.Y. Hu Comparative study of 4Fr catheters using the ACIST variable rate injector system versus 6Fr catheters using hand manifold in diagnostic coronary angiography via transradial approach Chin Med J (Engl) 123 2010 1373 1376
7. S. Khoukaz, M.J. Kern, S.R. Bitar, E. Azrak, M. Eisenhauer, T. Wolford, and A. El-Shafei Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with acisted power injection: a randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52 2001 393 398
8. M.A. Gonzalez, I. Ben-Dor, M.A. Gaglia Jr., R. Torguson, H. Shimellis, A. Bui, W.O. Suddath, A.D. Pichard, L.F. Satler, and R. Waksman Qualitative comparison of coronary angiograms between 4 French catheters with an advanced cardiovascular injection system and 6 French catheters with manual injection Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79 2012 843 848
9. J.R. Hwang, S. D'Alfonso, W.J. Kostuk, P. Diamantouros, P. Teefy, G. Jablonsky, and S. Lavi Contrast volume use in manual vs automated contrast injection systems for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions Can J Cardiol 29 2013 372 376
10. D. Moher, D.J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, and D.F. Stroup Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses Lancet 354 1999 1896 1900
11. A.R. Jadad, R.A. Moore, D. Carroll, C. Jenkinson, D.J. Reynolds, D.J. Gavaghan, and H.J. McQuay Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17 1996 1 12
12. D.A. Henry, A.J. Moxey, P.A. Carless, D. O'Connell, B. McClelland, K.M. Henderson, K. Sly, A. Laupacis, and D. Fergusson Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001 CD001886
13. J.R. Brown, N.J. Birkmeyer, and G.T. O'Connor Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of antifibrinolytic agents in cardiac surgery Circulation 115 2007 2801 2813
14. R.W. Godley II, K. Joshi, and J.A. Breall A comparison of the use of traditional hand injection versus automated contrast injectors during cardiac catheterization J Invasive Cardiol 24 2012 628 630
15. A.L. Bartorelli, and G. Marenzi Contrast-induced nephropathy J Interv Cardiol 21 2008 74 85
16. J.R. Brown, J.F. Robb, C.A. Block, A.C. Schoolwerth, A.V. Kaplan, G.T. O'Connor, R.J. Solomon, and D.J. Malenka Does safe dosing of iodinated contrast prevent contrast-induced acute kidney injury? Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3 2010 346 350
17. R. Mehran, E.D. Aymong, E. Nikolsky, Z. Lasic, I. Iakovou, M. Fahy, G.S. Mintz, A.J. Lansky, J.W. Moses, G.W. Stone, M.B. Leon, and G. Dangas A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation J Am Coll Cardiol 44 2004 1393 1399