Bioenergy that supports ecological restoration

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 535-540

  Nackley, Lloyd L ^a   Lieu, Valerie H ^a,b   Garcia, Betzaida Batalla ^a,b   Richardson, Jeffrey J ^a   Isaac, Everett ^a,c   Spies, Kurt ^a,b   Rigdon, Steve ^a,d   Schwartz, Daniel T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b University of Washington   (United States)

^c Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakama Nation ^*  (United States)

^d Yakama Power   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGY; BIOMASS; INVASIVE SPECIES; NITROGEN; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; TRANSPORTATION; TREE;

UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

ELAEAGNUS ANGUSTIFOLIA; TAMARIX; TAMARIX RAMOSISSIMA;

EID: 84890408359     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/120241     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baxter LL, Miles TR, Jenkins BM, et al. 1998. The behavior of inorganic material in biomass-fired power boilers: field and laboratory experiences. Fuel Process Technol 54: 47-78.
2. Bryan BA, King D, and Wang E. 2010. Biofuels agriculture: landscape- scale trade-offs between fuel, economics, carbon, energy, food, and fiber. GCB Bioenergy 2: 330-45.
3. Davis S, Parton W, Grosso S, et al. 2011. Impact of second-generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse-gas emissions in the corn-growing regions of the US. Front Ecol Environ 10: 69-74.
4. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, et al. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311: 506-08.
5. Giuntoli J, de Jong W, Verkooijen AHM, et al. 2010. Combustion characteristics of biomass residues and biowastes: fate of fuel nitrogen. Energ Fuel 24: 5309-19.
6. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, et al. 2006. Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 11206-10.
7. Jakubowski AR, Casler MD, and Jackson RD. 2010. The benefits of harvesting wetland invaders for cellulosic biofuel: an ecosystem services perspective. Restor Ecol 18: 789-95.
8. Jarnevich C and Reynolds L. 2011. Challenges of predicting the potential distribution of a slow-spreading invader: a habitat suitability map for an invasive riparian tree. Biol Invasions 12: 153-63.
9. Morisette J, Jarnevich C, Ullah A, et al. 2006. A tamarisk habitat suitability map for the continental United States. Front Ecol Environ 4: 11-17.
10. Nagler P, Glenn E, Jarnevich C, and Shafroth P. 2011. Distribution and abundance of saltcedar and Russian olive in the western United States. CRC Cr Rev Plant Sci 30: 508-23.
11. Polagye BL, Hodgson KT, and Malte PC. 2007. An economic analysis of bio-energy options using thinnings from overstocked forests. Biomass Bioenerg 31: 105-25.
12. Raghu S, Anderson R, Daehler C, et al. 2006. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire? Science 313: 1742.
13. Richardson JJ, Spies KA, Rigdon S, et al. 2011. Uncertainty in biomass supply estimates: lessons from a Yakama Nation case study. Biomass Bioenerg 35: 3698-07.
14. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, et al. 2008. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319: 1238-40.
15. Tamarisk Coalition. 2008. Riparian restoration: assessment of alternative technologies for tamarisk control, biomass reduction and revegetation. Grand Junction, CO: Tamarisk Coalition. US DOE (US Department of Energy). 2011a. Biomass multi-year program plan. Washington, DC: US DOE. DOE/EE-0405.
16. US DOE (US Department of Energy). 2011b. US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. ORNL/TM- 2011/224.
17. Van Loo S and Koppejan J (Eds). 2008. The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. London, UK: Earthscan.
18. Walsh ME. 1998. US bioenergy crop economic analyses: status and needs. Biomass Bioenerg 14: 341-50.
19. White E. 2010. Woody biomass for bioenergy and biofuels in the United States - a briefing paper. Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-825.
20. Wiens J, Fargione J, and Hill J. 2011. Biofuels and biodiversity. Ecol Appl 21: 1085-95.