Automated image analysis framework for high-throughput determination of grapevine berry sizes using conditional random fields

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 100, Issue , 2014, Pages 148-158

  Roscher, Ribana ^a   Herzog, Katja ^b   Kunkel, Annemarie ^a   Kicherer, Anna ^b   Töpfer, Reinhard ^b   Förstner, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PATHOGEN DIAGNOSTICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Berry size; Conditional random fields; Grapevine; Images; Machine vision; Phenotyping

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; RANDOM PROCESSES;

BERRY SIZE; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; GRAPEVINE; IMAGES; PHENOTYPING;

FRUITS;

AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; AUTOMATION; COLOR; DATA SET; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEARNING; PHENOTYPE; VINE; VINEYARD;

EID: 84890387560     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abraham, S., Hau, T., 1997. Towards autonomous highprecision calibration of digital cameras. In: Proceedings of SPIE Annual Meeting, Videometrics V. Vol. 3174. pp. 82-93.
2. Bar M., Ullman S. Spatial context in recognition. Perception 1996, 25(3):343-352.
3. Berenstein R., Shahar O., Shapiro A., Edan Y. Grape clusters and foliage detection algorithms for autonomous selective vineyard sprayer. Intell. Ser. Robot. 2010, 3(4):233-243.
4. Beslic Z., Todic S., Sivcev B. Inheritance of yield components and quality of grape in hybridization of grapevine cultivars. Acta Horticult. 2009, 827:501-503.
5. Biederman I., Mezzanotte R., Rabinowitz J. Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognit. Psychol. 1982, 14(2):143-177.
6. Bloesch B., Viret O. Stades phnologiques repres de la vigne. Revue Suisse de Viticult. Arboricult. Horticult. 2008, 40(6):1-4.
7. Boykov Y., Veksler O., Zabih R. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 2001, 23(11):2001.
8. Cabezas J., Cervera M., Ruiz-Garcia L., Carreno J., Martinez-Zapater J. A genetic analysis of seed and berry weight in grapevine. Genome 2006, 49(12):1572-1585.
9. Chan, T., Shen, J., 2005. Image processing and analysis: variational, pde, wavelet, and stochastic methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
10. Costantini L., Battilana J., Lamaj F., Fanizza G., Grando M. Berry and phenology-related traits in grapevine (vitis vinifera l.): from quantitative trait loci to underlying genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8(1):38.
11. Dalal, N., Triggs, B., 2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 886-893.
12. Descombes X., Minlos R., Zhizhina E. Object extraction using a stochastic birth-and-death dynamics in continuum. J. Math. Imag. Vis. 2009, 33(3):347-359.
13. Fanizza G., Lamaj F., Costantini L., Chaabane R., Grando M. Qtl analysis for fruit yield components in table grapes (vitis vinifera). Theor. Appl. Gene. 2005, 111(4):658-664.
14. Furukawa Y., Ponce J. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010, 32(8):1362-1376.
15. Galleguillos C., Rabinovich A., Belongie S. Object categorization using co-occurrence, location and appearance. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2008, 1-8. IEEE.
16. Gould S., Rodgers J., Cohen D., Elidan G., Koller D. Multi-class segmentation with relative location prior. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2008, 80(3):300-316.
17. Hidayat, R., Green, R., 2009. Real-time texture boundary detection from ridges in the standard deviation space. In: British Machine Vision Conference.
18. Hsu H.-H., Hsieh C.-W. Feature selection via correlation coefficient clustering. J. Softw. 2010, 5(12):1371-1377.
19. Khan S.S., Madden M.G. A survey of recent trends in one class classification. Proc. Irish Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science, AICS'09 2010, 188-197. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, .
20. Korč F., Förstner W. Approximate parameter learning in conditional random fields: an empirical investigation. Pattern Recognition 2008, 11-20. Springer.
21. Lafarge F., Gimel'Farb G., Descombes X. Geometric feature extraction by a multimarked point process. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010, 32(9):1597-1609.
22. Lafferty, J.D., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N., 2001. Conditional random fields: probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning.
23. Lempitsky, V., Zisserman, A., 2010. Learning to count objects in images. In: Proc. Neural Information Processing Systems.
24. Mazzetto F., Calcante A., Mena A., Vercesi A. Integration of optical and analogue sensors for monitoring canopy health and vigour in precision viticulture. Precis. Agric. 2010, 11(6):636-649.
25. Moya, M., Hostetler, L.K.M., 1993. One-class classifier networks for target recognition applications. In: Proc. World Congress on Neural Networks.
26. Nuske, S., Achar, S., Bates, T., Narasimhan, S., Singh, S., September 2011. Yield estimation in vineyards by visual grape detection. In: Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
27. OIV, 2001. 2nd Edition of the Oiv Descriptor List for Grape Varieties and Vitis Species <>. http://www.oiv.int.
28. Oliva A., Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2001, 42(3):145-175.
29. Palmer t.E. The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory Cognit. 1975, 3(5):519-526.
30. Peng T., Balijepalli A., Gupta S., LeBrun T. Algorithms for on-line monitoring of micro spheres in an optical tweezers-based assembly cell. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 2007, 7(4):330-338.
31. Rabinovich A., Vedaldi A., Galleguillos C., Wiewiora E., Belongie S. Objects in context. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision 2007, 1-8. IEEE.
32. Settles, B., 2010. Active learning literature survey, computer sciences technical report 1648. Tech. rep., University of Wisconsin Madison.
33. Song, Y., Wen, Z., Lin, C.-Y., Davis, R., August 2013. One-class conditional random fields for sequential anomaly detection. In: Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Beijing, China.
34. Tax, D., 2001. One-class classification: concept-learning in the absence of counter-examples. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
35. Töpfer R., Hausmann L., Harst M., Maul E., Zyprian E., Eibach R. New horizons for grapevine breeding. Methods in Temperate Fruit Breeding. Fruit Veg. Cereal Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 5(Special Issue 1):79-100.