Culture modulates perceptual atention: An event-related potential study

Social Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 758-769

  Kitayama, Shinobu ^a   Murata, Asuka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890381217     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.6.758     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adams R. B., Jr., Ambady, N., Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. (Eds.). (2010). Science of social vision. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
3. Bruner, J. S., & Tagiuri, R. (1954). The perception of people. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 634-654). New York: Addison-Wesley.
4. Cacioppo, J.T., Crites, S. L., Berntson, G. G., & Coles, M. G. H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential? Psychological Science, 4(2), 108-112.
5. Chua, H. F., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(35), 12629-12633.
6. Erdelyi, M. H. (1974). A new look at the new look: Perceptual defense and vigilance. Psychological Review, 81(1), 1-25.
7. Folstein, J. R. & Van Petten, C. (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152-170.
8. Goh, J. O., Chee, M. W., Tan, J. C., Venkatraman, V., Hebrank, A., Leshikar, E., . . . Park, D. C. (2007). Age and culture modulate object processing and object-scene binding in the ventral visual area. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(1), 44-52.
9. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
10. Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2008) Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(1), 12-17.
11. Ishii, K., Kobayashi, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Interdependence modulates the brain response to word-voice incongruity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5(2-3), 307-317.
12. Johnson, R., Jr. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (pp. 69-137). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
13. Kitayama, S. (1990). Interaction between affect and cognition in word perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 209-217.
14. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14(3), 201-206.
15. Kitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M., & Uskul, A. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 236-255.
16. Kitayama, S., & Uskul, A. (2011). Culture, mind, and the brain: Current evidence and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 419-449.
17. Kok, A. (2001). On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology, 38(3), 557-577.
18. Lewis, R. S., Goto, S. G., & Kong, L. L. (2008). Culture and context: East Asian American and European American differences in P3 event-related potentials and selfconstrual. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(5), 623-634.
19. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
20. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2006). Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381-399.
21. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922-934.
22. Murata, A., Lee, H., Park, J., Kovelman, I., & Kitayama, S. (2012). Compensatory brain response for cultural biases in perception using functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
23. Na, J., & Kitayama, S. (2011). Spontaneous trait inference is culture-specific: Behavioral and neural evidence. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1025-1032.
24. Näätänen R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Niedenthal, P. M., & Kitayama, S. (Eds.). (1994). The heart's eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention. New York: Academic Press.
26. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.
27. Ruchkin, D. S., Johnson, R., Jr., Mahaffey, D., & Sutton, S. (1988). Toward a functional categorization of slow waves. Psychophysiology, 25(3), 339-353.
28. Sutton, S., Braren, M., Zubin, J., & John, E. R. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150(3700), 1187-1188.
29. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A featureintegration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
30. Varnum, M. E., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: Evidence for the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9-13.