A classification for comparing standardized XML data

Proceedings - International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 517-524

  Strömbäck, Lena ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC MATCHING; INFORMATION CONTENTS; TWO DOMAINS; XML DATA; XML STANDARDS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DIGITAL TELEVISION; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; EXPERT SYSTEMS; XML;

STANDARDS;

EID: 84890372078     PISSN: 15294188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Abello A, Palol X, Hacid MS (2005) On the Midpoint of a Set of XML Documents. Proc. DEXA 2005, Copenhagen Denmark.
2. Amer-Yahia S, Koudas N, Marian A, et al. (2005) Structure and Content Scoring for XML. Proc VLDB 2005, Trondheim, Norway, pp 361-372.
3. Bader GD, Donaldson I, Wolting C, et al. (2001) BIND - The Biomolecular Network Database. Nucleic Acids Research 29(1):242-245.
4. BioPAX working Group (2004) BioPAX - Biological Pathways Exchange Language Level 1, Version 1.0 Documentation. Available at http://www.biopax.org.
5. De Meo P, Qittrone G, Terracina G et al. (2003) "Almost Automatic" and Semantic Integration of XML Schemas at Various "Severity" Levels. R Meershman et al. (eds.): CooPIS/DOA/ODBASE 2003, LNCS 2888.
6. Do HH and Mahr E (2002) COMA - A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. VLDB 2002, Hong Kong, China.
7. Doan A and Halevy AY (2004) Semantic Integration Research in the Database Community: A brief Survey. AI Magazine, Special Issue on Semantic Integration, Spring 2005.
8. Downey, K (2004) Television Listings and XMLTV. http://www.xml.com/pub/a/ 2004/02/18/xmltv.htmlOReillyXML.COM (Accessed March 2005).
9. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Bader G, et al. (2004) The HUPO PSI's Molecular Interaction format - A community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nature Biotechnology 22(2):177-183.
10. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. (2003) The systems biology markup language (SBML): A medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 19(4):524-531.
11. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, et al. (2004) The KEGG resources for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D277-D280.
12. Lambrix P and Tan H (2005) A Framework for Aligning Ontologies. F. Fages and S Soliman (Eds.): PPSWR 2005, LNCS 3703, pp. 17-31.
13. Melnik S, Garcia Molina H, Rahm E (2002) Similarity Flooding: A versatile Graph Matching Algorithm and its Applications to Schema Matching. Proc ICDE2002, 1063- 6382/02. IEEE Computer Society.
14. Rahm E and Bernstein PA (2001) A survey of approaches to semantic schema matching. The VLDB Journal 10:334-350. DOI 10-1007/s007780100057.
15. Shen Y and Wang B (2003) Clustering Schemaless XML Documents. R Meershman et al. (eds.): CooPIS/DOA/ODBASE 2003, LNCS 2888, pp. 767-784.
16. Smiljanic M, Keulen M and Jonker W (2005) Formalizing the XML Schema Matching Problem as a Constraint Optimization Problem. Proc. DEXA 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark.
17. Strömbäck, L (2004) XML representations of pathway data: A comparison. Proc. ACM SIGIR'04 Workshop on Search and Discovery within Bioinformatics. Sheffield UK.
18. Strömbäck, L and Lambrix P (2005). Representations of molecular pathways: An evaluation of SBML, PSI MI and BioPAX. Bioinformatics, 21(24):4401-4407, 2005.
19. Turcan E, Strömbäck L, and Morris J (2003) Share it! by bringing P2P into the TV-domain. Proc P2P 2002, Linköping, Sweden 1-3 September 2003.
20. TV-Anytime forum. www.tv-anytime.org (Accessed March 2005.