Impromaps: Applying Rasmussen's Risk Management Framework to improvisation incidents

Safety Science

Volumn 64, Issue , 2014, Pages 60-70

  Trotter, Margaret J ^a   Salmon, Paul M ^b   Lenné, Michael G ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

Author keywords

Accimap; Improvisation; Resilience; Sociotechnical systems; Systems safety

Indexed keywords

ACCIMAP; IMPROVISATION; RESILIENCE; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS SAFETY;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SAFETY TESTING;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

ACCIMAP METHODOLOGY; ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RASMUSSEN RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

EID: 84890361460     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bigley G.A., Roberts K.H. The incident command system: high reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Acad. Manag. 2001, 44(6):1281-1299.
2. National Transportation Safety Board, 2010. Loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson River, US Airways Flight 1549, Airbus A320- 214, N106US, Weehawken, New Jersey, January 15, 2009. Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-10/03, Washington, DC.
3. Brookes, A., Smith, M., Corkill, B., 2009. Report to the trustees of the Sir Edmund Hillary Outdoor Pursuit Centre of New Zealand, Mangatepopo Gorge Incident, 15 April 2008.
4. Cassano-Piche A.L., Vicente K.J., Jamieson G.A. A test of Rasmussen's Risk Management Framework in the food safety domain: BSE in the UK. Theor. Issues Ergonom. Sci. 2009, 10(4):283-304.
5. Cooper H.S.F. 13: The flight that failed 1973, Angus and Robertson, London, UK.
6. Dekker S.W.A. Follow the procedure or survive. Human Fact. Aeros. Saf. 2001, 1(4):381-385.
7. Dekker S.W.A. Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on human error and performance. J. Saf. Res. 2002, 33:371-385.
8. Devonport, C.J., 2010. Mangatepopo Coroners Report, Auckland, 30th March 2010.
9. Grøtan, T., Størseth, F., Rø, M.H., Skjerve, A.B., 2008. Resilience, adaptation and improvisation - increasing resilience by organising for successful improvisation". In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Resilience Engineering, 28-30 October, Antibes, Juan-Les-Pins, France. (19.07.13). http://www.sintef-group.com/project/Building%20Safety/Publications/3rd%20RE%20symposium,%20resilience_adaptation_improvisation,%20TOG.pdf.
10. Hollnagel E. Resilience - the challenges of the unstable. Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts 2006, 9-17. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK. E. Hollnagel, D.D. Woods, N. Leveson (Eds.).
11. Houghton R.J., Baber C., McMaster R., Stanton N.A., Salmon P., Stewart R., Walker G. Command and control in emergency services operations: a social network analysis. Ergonomics 2006, 49(12-13):1204-1225. 10.1080/00140130600619528.
12. International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group, 1992. INSAG-7 The Chernobyl Accident: Updating of INSAG-1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. (17.11.12). http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub913e_web.pdf.
13. Jenkins D.P., Salmon P.M., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H. A systemic approach to accident analysis: a case study of the Stockwell shooting. Ergonomics 2010, 3(1):1-17.
14. Johnson C.W., Muniz de Almeida I. Extending the borders of accident investigation: applying novel analysis techniques to the loss of the Brazilian space launch vehicle VLS-1 V03. Saf. Sci. 2008, 46(1):38-53.
15. Kranz G. Failure is not an option 2000, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
16. Larsson P., Dekker S.W.A., Tingvall C. The need for a systems theory approach to road safety. Saf. Sci. 2010, 48(9):1167-1174.
17. Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 2004, 42(4):237-270.
18. Leveson N.G. Applying systems thinking to analyze and learn from events. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49(1):55-64.
19. Lovell J., Kluger J. Apollo 13 2006, Mariner Books, New York, NY.
20. Mendonça D. Decision support for improvisation in response to extreme events: learning from the response to the 2001 World Trade Centre attack. Decis. Support Syst. 2007, 43:952-967.
21. Moorman C., Miner A.S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1998, 23(4):698-723.
22. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970. Apollo 13 Mission Report. Manned Space Center, National Aeronautical and Space Agency, Houston, TX. (5.01.11). http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a13/A13_MissionReport.pdf.
23. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970. Apollo 13 Report of Apollo 13 review board. National Aeronautical and Space Agency, Houston, TX. (5.01.11). http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19700076776_1970076776.pdf.
24. Rafferty L.A., Stanton N.A., Walker G.H. Great expectations: a thematic analysis of situation awareness in fratricide. Saf. Sci. 2013, 56:63-71.
25. Rasmussen J. Risk management is a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 1997, 27(2-3):183-213.
26. Reason J. Human Error 1990, University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. Reason J. The human contribution: unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries 2008, Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
28. Salmon P.M., Cornelissen M., Trotter M.J. Systems-based accident analysis methods: a comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP. Saf. Sci. 2012, 50(4):1158-1170.
29. Salmon P.M., Williamson A., Lenne M.G., Mitsopoulos E., Rudin-Brown C.M. Systems-based accident analysis in the led outdoor activity domain: application and evaluation of a Risk Management Framework. Ergonomics 2010, 53(8):927-939.
30. Svedung I., Rasmussen J. Graphic representation of accident scenarios: mapping system structure and the causation of accidents. Saf. Sci. 2002, 40:397-417.
31. Trotter M.J., Salmon P.M., Lennè M.G. Improvisation: theory, measures and known influencing factors. Theor. Issues Ergonom. Sci. 2013, 14(5):475-498.
32. Vicente K.J., Christoffersen K. The Walkerton E. coli outbreak: a test of Rasmussen's framework for risk management in a dynamic society. Theor. Issues Ergonom. Sci. 2006, 7(2):93-112.
33. Walker G.H., Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M. Cognitive compatibility of motorcyclists and car drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2011, 43:878-888.
34. Westrum R. A typography of resilience situations. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts 2006, 55-65. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK. E. Hollnagel, D.D. Woods, N. Leveson (Eds.).
35. Woods D.D., Hollnagel E. Prologue: resilience engineering concepts. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts 2006, 1-8. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK. E. Hollnagel, D.D. Woods, N. Leveson (Eds.).
36. Young K.L., Salmon P.M., Cornelissen M. Missing links? The effects of distraction on driver situation awareness. Saf. Sci. 2013, 56:36-43.