Virtual reality training improves da vinci performance: A prospective trial

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 992-998

  Cho, Jae Sung ^a   Hahn, Koo Yong ^b   Kwak, Jung Myun ^a   Kim, Jin ^a   Baek, Se Jin ^a   Shin, Jae Won ^a   Kim, Seon Hahn ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Korea University Postgraduate School Department of Surgery Sung Nam Chung Ang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SIMULATOR; SURGICAL TRAINING; VIRTUAL REALITY; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; LEARNING CURVE; STANDARDS; SURGERY;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SPECIALTIES, SURGICAL; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84890344302     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: 15579034     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0396     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Pugin F, Bucher P, Morel P. History of robotic surgery: From AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®. J Visc Surg 2011;148: e3-e8.
2. Gurusamy K, Aggarwal R, Palanvelu L, Davidson BR. Systemic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of virtual reality training for laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 2008;95:1088-1097.
3. Mahadevan V. The Human Tissue Act 2004: Implications for anatomical work at the College. Bull R Coll Surg Engl 2006;88:264-265.
4. Pellen MG, Horgan LF, Barton JR, Attood SE. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 2009;23:130-139.
5. Gilley DA, Sundaram CP. Impact of virtual reality simulators in training of robotic surgery. In: Hemal AK, Menon M, eds. Robotics in Genitourinary Surgery. London: Springer-Verlag, 2011:163-168.
6. Lendvay TS, Casale P, Sweet R, Peters C. VR robotic surgery: Randomized blinded study of the Dv-Trainer robotic simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;132:242-244.
7. Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino JA, Moinzadeh A. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-Trainertm, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology 2009;73:1288-1292.
8. Sethi AS, Peinie WJ, Mohammadi Y, Sundaram CP. Validation of novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol 2009;23:503-508.
9. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, Cai J, Nq CK, Aron M, Gill IS, Desai MM. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 2011;186:1019-1024.
10. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:23-29.
11. Stefanidis D, Wang F, Dune SB, Scott DJ. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 2010;24:377-382.
12. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalii G, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding GE, Guru KA. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 2010;76:357-360.
13. Katsavelis D, Siu K, Brown-Clerk B, et al. Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment. Surg Endosc 2009;23:66-73.
14. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorhy K, Bann S, Darzi A. Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: Is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 2004;18:485-494.
15. Barreq RA, Jayarman S, Kiaii B, Schlachta C, Pautler SE. The role of surgical simulation and the learning curve in robotassisted surgery. J Robotic Surg 2008;2:11-15.
16. Lee BR, Caddede JA, Janetscek G, et al. International surgical telemonitoring: Our initial experience. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998;50:41-47.
17. Caddedu JA, Kondraske GV. Human performance testing and simulators. J Endourol 2007;21:300-304.
18. Rehring ST, Powers K, Jones DB. Integrating simulation in surgery as a teaching tool and credentialing standard. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:222-233.
19. Subramonian K, Muir G. The 'learning curve' in surgery: What is it, how do we measure it and can we influence it? BJU Int 2004;93:1173-1174.
20. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004;91:146-150.
21. Halvorsen FH, Elle OJ, Dalinin V V, Merk BE, Sorhus V, Rotnes JS, Fosse E. Virtual reality simulator training equals mechanical robotic training in improving robot-assisted basic suturing skills. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1565-1569.
22. Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP. Dose training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci® surgical system? J Endourol 2010;24:467-472.
23. Chang L, Satava RM, Pellefrinin CA, Sinannan MN. Robotic surgery: Identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 2003;17: 1744-1748.