Considering variations in waste composition during waste input-output modeling

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 892-899

  Li, Jing ^a   Lin, Chen ^a   Huang, Shaoan ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Economic input output analysis (EIO); Hybrid model; Industrial ecology; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Substance flow analysis (SFA); Waste treatment

Indexed keywords

WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

HYBRID MODEL; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; INPUT OUTPUT ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA); SUBSTANCE FLOW ANALYSIS;

LIFE CYCLE;

CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; WASTE FACILITY; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

GERMANY;

EID: 84890312628     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12068     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation and Water Environment Federation. 1912. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
2. Brunner, P. and H. Ma. 2009. Substance flow analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(1): 11-14.
3. Brunner, P. and H. Rechberger. 2004. Practical handbook of material flow analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(5): 337-338.
4. Duchin, F. 1990. The conversion of biological materials and wastes to useful products. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 1(2): 243-261.
5. Finnveden, G., A. Albertsson, J. Berendson, E. Eriksson, L. Hoglund, S. Karlsson, and J. Sundqvist. 1995. Solid waste treatment within the frame-work of life-cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 3(4): 189-199.
6. Frischknecht, R., N. Jungbluth, H. Althaus, G. Doka, R. Dones, T. Heck, S. Hellweg, et al. 2005. The ecoinvent database: Overview and methodological framework. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(1): 3-9.
7. Galan, B. and I. Grossmann. 1998. Optimal design of distributed wastewater treatment networks. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 37(10): 4036-4048.
8. Hernandez-Suarez, R., J. Castellanos-Fernandez, and J. Zamora. 2004. Superstructure decomposition and parametric optimization approach for the synthesis of distributed wastewater treatment networks. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43(9): 2175-2191.
9. Huang, C., C. Chang, H. Ling, and C. Chang. 1999. A mathematical programming model for water usage and treatment network design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 38(7): 2666-2679.
10. IChemE Education Subject Group. 2002. Chemicals cost guide, 2002. http://ed.icheme.org/costchem.html. Accessed February 2002.
11. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1997. International standard 14040: Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.
12. Köhler, A., S. Hellweg, E. Recan, and K. Hungerbühler. 2007. Input-dependent life-cycle inventory model of industrial wastewater-treatment processes in the chemical sector. Environmental Science & Technology 41(15): 5515-5522.
13. Kondo, Y. and S. Nakamura. 2005. Waste input-output linear programming model with its application to eco-efficiency analysis. Economic Systems Research 17(4): 393-408.
14. Lim, S., D. Park, and J. Park. 2008. Environmental and economic feasibility study of a total wastewater treatment network system. Journal of Environmental Management 88(3): 564-575.
15. Lin, C. 2009. Hybrid input-output analysis of wastewater treatment and environmental impacts: A case study for the Tokyo metropolis. Ecological Economics 68(7): 2096-2105.
16. Lin, C. 2011. Identifying lowest-emission choices and environmental pareto frontiers for wastewater treatment: Wastewater treatment input-output model based linear programming. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(3): 367-380.
17. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. 2003. Wastewater engineering, treatment and reuse, 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Muñoz, I., L. M. Canals, and R. Clift. 2008. Consider a spherical man: A simple model to include human excretion in life cycle assessment of food products. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(4): 521-538.
19. Nakamura, S. and Y. Kondo. 2002. Input-output analysis of waste management. Journal of Industrial Ecology 6(1): 39-63.
20. Nakamura, S. and Y. Kondo. 2009. Waste input-output analysis. Eco-efficiency in industry and science, Vol. 26. New York: Springer.
21. Smith, R. and P. Varbanov. 2005. What's the price of steam? Chemical Engineering Progress 101(7): 29-33.
22. Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. 2007. German input output table yearbook 2007. Wiesbaden, Germany: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland.
23. Suh, S. 2004. Functions, commodities and environmental impacts in an ecological-economic model. Ecological Economics 48(4): 451-467.
24. Suh, S. 2005. Theory of materials and energy flow analysis in ecology and economics. Ecological Modelling 189(3): 251-269.
25. Suh, S. and S. Yee. 2011. Phosphorus use-efficiency of agriculture and food system in the US. Chemosphere 84(6): 806-813.
26. Suh, S., M. Lenzen, G. Treloar, H. Hondo, A. Horvath, G. Huppes, O. Jolliet, et al. 2004. System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. Environmental Science & Technology 38(3): 657-664.
27. Takase, K., Y. Kondo, and A. Washizu. 2005. An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input-output model. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9(1-2): 201-219.
28. Tanaka, S. and T. Matsuto. 1998. Report on the development of the evaluation system that supports the integrated control of municipal waste. Graduate School of Environmental Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.