The effects of carbon prices and anti-leakage policies on selected industrial sectors in spain - Cement, steel and oil refining

Energy Policy

Volumn 65, Issue , 2014, Pages 708-717

  Santamaría, Alberto ^a   Linares, Pedro ^a   Pintos, Pablo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PONTIFICIA COMILLAS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Carbon leakage; Cement; EU ETS; Oil refining; Steel

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CEMENTS; COSTS; CRUDE OIL PRICE; GAS EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL LAW; PETROLEUM REFINING; STEEL;

CARBON ALLOWANCES; CARBON LEAKAGE; ENGINEERING MODELS; EUROPEAN EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; OIL REFINING; POLICY MEASURES; POTENTIAL EFFECTS;

PETROLEUM INDUSTRY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CEMENT; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY; LEAKAGE; PRICE DYNAMICS; REFINING INDUSTRY;

EUROPE;

EID: 84890310786     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.031     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AOP, 2011. Spanish Association of Petroleum Producers. http://www.aop.es.
2. BP, 2013. Statistical Review of the World.
3. Cook, G., 2009. Climate Change and the Cement Industry: Assessing Emissions and Policy Responses to Carbon Prices. Climate Strategies Working Paper.
4. Cook, G., 2011. Investment, Carbon Pricing and Leakage - A Cement Sector Perspective. Climate Strategies Working Paper.
5. de Bruyn S., Nelissen D., Korteland M., Davidson M., Faber J., van de Vreede G. Impacts on Competitiveness From EU ETS. An Analysis of the Dutch Industry 2008, CE Delft.
6. 2 abatement, competitiveness and leakage in the European cement industry under the EU ETS: grandfathering versus output-based allocation. Clim. Policy 2006, 6:93-113.
7. 2 en fonction de la production ou bien les ajuster aux frontières. Rev. Econ. 2008, 59(3):497-504.
8. Droege, S., et al., 2009. Tackling Leakage in a World of Unequal Carbon Prices. Climate Strategies Working Paper.
9. Eskeland G.S., Harrison A.E. Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J. Dev. Econ. 2003, 70:1-23.
10. EUROFER, 2011. European Confederation of Iron and Steel Industries. http://www.eurofer.org/About%20Steel/EuropeanSteelMap.fhtml.
11. EC, 2010. Commission Decision of 24 December 2009 Determining, Pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a List of Sectors and Subsectors which are Deemed to be Exposed to a Significant Risk of Carbon Leakage (Notified Under Document C (2009) 10251).
12. Ghersi F., Hourcade J.-C. Macroeconomic consistency issues in E3 modelling: the continued fable of the elephant and the rabbit. Energy J. Spec. Issue 2 2006, 39-61.
13. Hourcade J., et al. Differentiation and dynamics of EU ETS industrial competitiveness impacts. Clim. Strategies 2007.
14. IDAE, 2011. Plan de Energías Renovables (PER) 2011-2020. Approved in November 11, 2011 by the Spanish Government.
15. Levinson A., Taylor M.S. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int. Econ. Rev. 2008, 49:223-254.
16. Monjon, S. and Quirion, P., 2009. Assessing Leakage in the EU ETS. Results From the CASE II Model. Climate Strategies Working Paper.
17. Monjon S., Quirion P. Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: border adjustment or output-based allocation?. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70:1957-1971.
18. Morgenstern R.D., et al. The near-term impacts of carbon mitigation policies on manufacturing industries. Energy Policy 2004, 32:1825-1842.
19. Oficemen, 2011. Association of Spanish Cement Producers. http://www.oficemen.com.
20. Reinaud J. Industrial Competitiveness Under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme 2004, International Energy Agency, Paris.
21. 2 emission trading within the European Union and Annex B countries: the cement industry case. Energy Policy 2006, 34:72-87.
22. UNESID, 2011. Association of Spanish Steel Companies. http://www.unesid.org.