Hospital Inpatient versus HOme-based rehabilitation after knee arthroplasty (The HIHO study): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Buhagiar, Mark A ^a,b   Naylor, Justine M ^b,c,d,e   Harris, Ian A ^b,c,d,e   Xuan, Wei ^b,e   Kohler, Friedbert ^a,b,c   Wright, Rachael J ^b   Fortunato, Renee ^b  

^a Braeside Hospital   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c SOUTH WESTERN SYDNEY LOCAL HEALTH DISTRICT   (Australia)

^d Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre   (Australia)

^e INGHAM INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY CARE; GAIT; HOME REHABILITATION; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MEDICAL FEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION; RETURN TO WORK; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WALKING;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; HOME CARE SERVICES, HOSPITAL-BASED; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; KNEE JOINT; MIDDLE AGED; NEW SOUTH WALES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 84890278240     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-432     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Costs and Charges. [http://healthtopics.hcf.com.au/TotalKneeReplacement.aspx].
2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide 2012, South Australia, Australia: AOA, Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
3. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ. Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:2606-2612.
4. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 9th Annual Report. 2012, [http://www.njrcentre.org.uk], National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
5. Knutson K, Robertson O. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: the inside story. Acta Orthop 2010, 81:5-7. [http://www.knee.se].
6. Kim S. Changes in surgical loads and economic burden of hip and knee replacements in the US: 1997-2004. Arthritis Rheum 2008, 59:481-488.
7. Hurst J, Siciliani L. Tackling excessive waiting times for elective surgery: a comparison of policies in twelve OECD countries. Health Policy 2003, 72:201-215.
8. Harvey P. The politics of public sector change. Trends in health and education sector change in South Australia. Aust Fam Physician 2003, 32:373-375.
9. Schoeni R, Freedman V, Martin L. Why is late-life disability declining?. Milbank Q 2008, 86:47-89.
10. Losina E, Walensky RP, Kessler CL, Emrani PS, Reichmann WM, Wright EA, Holt HL, Solomon DH, Yelin E, Paltiel D, Katz JN. Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. Arch Intern Med 2009, 169:1113-1122.
11. Segal L, Day SE, Chapman AB, Osborne RH. Can we reduce disease burden from osteoarthritis? An evidence-based priority-setting model. Med J Aust 2004, 180(5 Suppl):S11-S17.
12. Lavernia CJ. Post discharge costs in arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl):144-150.
13. Tribe KL, Lapsley HM, Cross MJ, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM, March LM. Selection of patients for inpatient rehabilitation or direct home discharge following total joint replacement surgery: a comparison of health status and out-of-pocket expenditure of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Chronic Illn 2005, 1:289-302.
14. Zuckerman JD. Inpatient rehabilitation after total joint replacement. JAMA 1998, 279:880.
15. Soderstrom L, Tousignant P, Kaufman T. The health and cost effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence. Can Med Assoc J 1999, 160:1151-1155.
16. Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, Badley E, Davey JR, Syed KA, Coyte PC, Gandhi R, Wright JG. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:1673-1680.
17. Krummenauer F. The incremental cost effectiveness of in-patient versus outpatient rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty. Results of a pilot investigation. Eur J Med Res 2008, 13:267-274.
18. Ko V, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Crosbie J, Yeo AET, Mittal R. One-to-one therapy is not superior to group- or home-based therapy after knee arthroplasty: a randomized, superiority trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013, 95:1942-1949.
19. Troosters T, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Six-minute walk test: a valuable test, when properly standardised. Phys Ther 2002, 82:826-827. author reply 827-828.
20. Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007, 39:1435-1445.
21. American Geriatrics Society Exercise prescription for older adults with osteoarthritis pain: consensus practice recommendations. A supplement to the AGS Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of chronic pain in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001, 49:808-823. American Geriatrics Society.
22. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998, 28:88-96.
23. Group EQ. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990, 16:199-208.
24. Ko V, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Crosbie J, Yeo AET. The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013, 14:145.
25. Harmer AR, Naylor JM, Crosbie J, Russell T. Land versus water-based rehabilitation following total knee replacement: a randomized, single-blind trial. Arthritis Care Res 2009, 61:184-191.
26. Kramer JF, Speechley M, Bourne M, Rorabeck C. Comparison of clinic- and home-based rehabilitation programs after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 410:225-234.
27. Lin C, March L, Crosbie J, Crawford R, Graves S, Naylor J, Harmer A, Bennel K, Harris I, Parker D, Moffet H, Fransen M. Maximum recovery after knee replacement - the MARKER study rationale and protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009, 10:69.
28. Rajan RA, Pack Y, Jackson H, Gillies C, Asirvatham R. No need for outpatient physiotherapy following total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 2004, 75:71-73.
29. Naylor JM, Harmer AR, Fransen M, Crosbie J, Innes L. Status of physiotherapy rehabilitation following total knee replacement in Australia. Physiother Res Int 2006, 11:35-47.
30. Mockford BJ, Thompson NW, Humphreys P, Beverland DE. Does a standard outpatient physiotherapy regime improve the range of knee motion after primary total knee arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:1110-1114.
31. Brach JS, Perera S, Studenski S, Newman AB. The reliability and validity of measures of gait variability in community-dwelling older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008, 89:2293-2296.
32. Naylor JM, Yeo AET, Mittal R, Ko V, Harris IA. Improvements in knee range and symptomatic and functional behavior after knee arthroplasty based on preoperative restriction in range. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1100-1105.
33. Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Katz JN. Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure?. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:286-294.
34. Xie F, Pullenayegum EM, Li SC, Hopkins R, Thumboo J, Lo NN. Use of a disease-specific instrument in economic evaluations: mapping WOMAC onto the EQ-5D utility index. Value Health 2010, 1:873-878.
35. Adamson SJ, Bland JM, Hay EM, Johnson RE, Jones GT, Kitchener H, Moffett JA, Macfarlane GJ, MacPherson H, McLean S, Nelson L, Salisbury C, Thomas E, Tilbrook HE, Torgerson DJ,. Preference Collaborative Review Group Patients' preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. BMJ 2008, 337:a1864. Preference Collaborative Review Group.
36. Peat G, Croft P, Hay E. Clinical assessment of the osteoarthritis patient. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2001, 15:527-544.
37. Sterne J, White I, Carlin J, Spratt M, Royston P, Wood A, Carpenter J. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009, 338:b2393.
38. Donders R, van der Heijdenc G, Stijnend T, Moonsc K. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:1087e-1091e.
39. Additional analyses. [http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/3-12---methods/item12b_additional-analyses/].