Quantitative cw Overhauser effect dynamic nuclear polarization for the analysis of local water dynamics

Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Volumn 74, Issue , 2013, Pages 33-56

  Franck, John M ^a   Pavlova, Anna ^a   Scott, John A ^a   Han, Songi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic nuclear polarization; Hydration dynamics; Hydration water; NMR relaxometry; Overhauser

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; HYDRATES; HYDRATION; PROBES; SPIN DYNAMICS; SPIN POLARIZATION; SPIN-LATTICE RELAXATION; TOOLS;

DYNAMIC NUCLEAR POLARIZATION; HYDRATION DYNAMICS; HYDRATION WATER; NMR RELAXOMETRY; OVERHAUSER;

NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

WATER;

CHEMISTRY; DYNAMIC NUCLEAR POLARIZATION; HYDRATION DYNAMICS; HYDRATION WATER; METHODOLOGY; NMR RELAXOMETRY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OVERHAUSER; REVIEW;

DYNAMIC NUCLEAR POLARIZATION; HYDRATION DYNAMICS; HYDRATION WATER; NMR RELAXOMETRY; OVERHAUSER;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; WATER;

EID: 84890262720     PISSN: 00796565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.06.001     Document Type: Review

References (108)

1. K.H. Hausser, D. Stehlik, Adv. Magn. Reson. 3 (1968) 79.
2. J.A. Villanueva-Garibay, G. Annino, P.J.M. van Bentum, A.P.M. Kentgens, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 (2010) 5846.
3. M.T. Türke, I. Tkach, M. Reese, P. Höfer, M. Bennati, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 (2010) 5893.
4. S. Stevenson, H.C. Dorn, Anal. Chem. 66 (1994) 2993.
5. R. Gitti, C. Wild, C. Tsiao, K. Zimmer, T.E. Glass, H.C. Dorn, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110 (1988) 2294.
6. H.C. Dorn, J. Wang, L. Allen, D. Sweeney, T.E. Glass, J. Magn. Reson. 79 (1988) 404.
7. M. Lingwood, S. Han, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 73 (2011) 83.
8. B.D. Armstrong, S. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 4641.
9. J.H. Ortony, C.Y. Cheng, J.M. Franck, R. Kausik, A. Pavlova, J. Hunt, S. Han, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 015006.
10. B.D. Armstrong, J. Choi, C.J. López, D.A. Wesener, W. Hubbell, S. Cavagnero, S. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 5987.
11. J.M. Franck, J.A. Scott, S. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2013).
12. A. Pavlova, E.R. McCarney, D.W. Peterson, F.W. Dahlquist, J. Lew, S. Han, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 (2009) 6833.
13. P.Z. Qin, I.S. Haworth, Q. Cai, A.K. Kusnetzow, G.P.G. Grant, E.A. Price, G.Z. Sowa, A. Popova, B. Herreros, H. He, Nat. Protoc. 2 (2007) 2354.
14. Q. Cai, A.K. Kusnetzow, W.L. Hubbell, I.S. Haworth, G.P.C. Gacho, N. Van Eps, K. Hideg, E.J. Chambers, P.Z. Qin, Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) 4722.
15. C.Y. Cheng, J.Y. Wang, R. Kausik, K.Y.C. Lee, S. Han, Biomacromolecules 13 (2012) 2624.
16. S. Hussain, J.M. Franck, S. Han, Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 52 (2013) 1953.
17. B.D. Armstrong, S. Han, J. Chem. Phys. 127 (2007) 104508.
18. I. Solomon, Phys. Rev. 99 (1955) 559.
19. M.W. Hodges, D.S. Cafiso, C.F. Polnaszek, C.C. Lester, R.G. Bryant, Biophys. J. 73 (1997) 2575.
20. R. Kausik, S. Han, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 18254.
21. J. Cavanagh, W.J. Fairbrother, A.G. Palmer III, N.J. Skelton, M. Rance, Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles and Practice, Academic Press, 2007.
22. A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1961.
23. In practical application, the relevant (microwave and radio) frequencies can be measured more accurately than one can measure the absolute value of the static field with a Hall probe.
24. A. Doll, E. Bordignon, B. Joseph, R. Tschaggelar, G. Jeschke, J. Magn. Reson. 222 (2012) 34.
25. 1 - E gives the polarization transferred in units of thermal polarization of the proton.
26. i.e. Induced by dipolar interaction with the electron spin.
27. C. Poole, Electron Spin Resonance: A Comprehensive Treatise on Experimental Techniques, Dover Publications, 1996.
28. R.D. Bates, W.S. Drozdoski, J. Chem. Phys. 67 (1977) 4038.
29. B.H. Robinson, D.A. Haas, C. Mailer, Science 263 (1994) 490.
30. M.T. Türke, M. Bennati, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 3630.
31. J. Hyde, J. Chien, J. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 48 (1968) 4211.
32. C. Popp, J. Hyde, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79 (1982) 2559.
33. B.D. Armstrong, M.D. Lingwood, E.R. McCarney, E.R. Brown, P. Blümler, S. Han, J. Magn. Reson. 191 (2008) 273.
34. D. Sezer, M.J. Prandolini, T.F. Prisner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 (2009) 6626.
35. V. Denysenkov, T. Prisner, J. Magn. Reson. 217 (2012) 1.
36. C. Griesinger, M. Bennati, H.M. Vieth, C. Luchinat, G. Parigi, P. Höfer, F. Engelke, S.J. Glaser, V. Denysenkov, T.F. Prisner, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 64 (2012) 4.
37. G. Annino, J. Villanueva-Garibay, P. van Bentum, A. Klaassen, A. Kentgens, Appl. Magn. Reson. 37 (2010) 851.
38. G. Annino, M. Cassettari, M. Martinelli, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 (2005) 084702.
39. E.R. McCarney, B.D. Armstrong, M.D. Lingwood, S. Han, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104 (2007) 1754.
40. M.D. Lingwood, A.J. Sederman, M.D. Mantle, L.F. Gladden, S. Han, J. Magn. Reson. 216 (2012) 94.
41. M.D. Lingwood, T.A. Siaw, N. Sailasuta, B.D. Ross, P. Bhattacharya, S. Han, J. Magn. Reson. 205 (2010) 247.
42. B.C. Dollmann, A.L. Kleschyov, V. Sen, V. Golubev, L.M. Schreiber, H.W. Spiess, K. Münnemann, D. Hinderberger, Chemphyschem 11 (2010) 3656.
43. K. Münnemann, C. Bauer, J. Schmiedeskamp, H.W. Spiess, W.G. Schreiber, D. Hinderberger, Appl. Magn. Reson. 34 (2008) 321.
44. J.G. Krummenacker, V.P. Denysenkov, M. Terekhov, L.M. Schreiber, T.F. Prisner, J. Magn. Reson. 215 (2012) 94.
45. M.D. Lingwood, T.A. Siaw, N. Sailasuta, O.A. Abulseoud, H.R. Chan, B.D. Ross, P. Bhattacharya, S. Han, Radiology 265 (2012) 418.
46. A. Abragam, The Principles of Nuclear Magnetism, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1961. pp. 301-302.
47. L. Hwang, J. Freed, J. Chem. Phys. 63 (1975) 4017.
48. Indeed, for isotropic models, d is typically termed the "distance of closest approach." However, in practical experiments, as shown by the work of Bryant and coworkers [72,19],it is standard practice to fit data for a non-isotropic system to an isotropic model, such as the FFHS model. In such a situation, it does not seem physically realistic that d actually represents the closest approach between the spin label and the water, as the typical phrasing would imply; rather d is, at best, a type of weighted average of the different closest approaches at different solid angles. Indeed, the FCR experiments of Bryant and coworkers do see a measurable change of the fit value of d in response to changes, e.g. changes in temperature, that would not seem physically capable of changing the distance of closest approach between the spin label and the water.
49. c is a functional of both the molecular trajectories and the form of the interaction used to probe those trajectories (in this work, the magnetic dipolar interaction), as it is specifically determined by the lifetime of the autocorrelation function for the interaction.
50. D. Zhong, S.K. Pal, A.H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett. 503 (2011) 1.
51. R. Murarka, T. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys. 126 (2007) 215101.
52. D. Russo, G. Hura, T. Head-Gordon, Biophys. J. 86 (2004) 1852.
53. D. Russo, J. Teixeira, L. Kneller, J.R.D. Copley, J. Ollivier, S. Perticaroli, E. Pellegrini, M.A. Gonzalez, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 4882.
54. C. Böttcher, O.V. Belle, Theory of Electric Polarization, Elsevier, 1978.
55. W. Huntress, Adv. Magn. Reson. 4 (1970) 1.
56. J. Hindman, A. Svirmickas, M. Wood, J. Chem. Phys. (1973).
57. A. Oleinikova, P. Sasisanker, H. Weingärtner, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 8467.
58. M. Bennati, C. Luchinat, G. Parigi, M.T. Türke, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 12 (2010) 5902.
59. -1].
60. L.P. Hwang, J. Chem. Phys. 63 (1975) 118.
61. D. Kruk, A. Herrmann, E.A. Rössler, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 63 (2012) 33.
62. D. Kruk, J. Kowalewski, J. Chem. Phys. 130 (2009) 174104.
63. J. Kowalewski, D. Kruk, Paramagnetic Relaxation in Solution, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007.
64. D. Spoel, P.J. Maaren, H.J.C.H. Berendsen, D. van der Spoel, P. van Maaren, J. Chem. Phys. 108 (1998) 10220.
65. H.W. Horn, W.C. Swope, J.W. Pitera, J.D. Madura, T.J. Dick, G.L. Hura, T. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys. 120 (2004) 9665.
66. D. Van Der Spoel, P. van Maaren, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2 (2006) 1.
67. B.D. Armstrong, P. Soto, J.E. Shea, S. Han, J. Magn. Reson. 200 (2009) 137.
68. D. Sezer, M. Gafurov, M.J. Prandolini, V.P. Denysenkov, T.F. Prisner, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 (2009) 6638.
69. D. Sezer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 (2013) 526.
70. C. Luchinat, G. Parigi, Appl. Magn. Reson. 34 (2008) 379.
71. P. Hofer, G. Parigi, C. Luchinat, P. Carl, G. Guthausen, M. Reese, T. Carlomagno, C. Griesinger, M. Bennati, P. Höfer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 3254.
72. C.F. Polnaszek, R.G. Bryant, J. Chem. Phys. 81 (1984) 4038.
73. J.P. Korb, G. Diakova, Y. Goddard, R.G. Bryant, J. Magn. Reson. 186 (2007) 176.
74. R.G. Bryant, M. Jarvis, J. Phys. Chem. 88 (1984) 1323.
75. P.J.M. van Bentum, G.H.A. van der Heijden, J.A. Villanueva-Garibay, A.P.M. Kentgens, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 17831.
76. M.J. Prandolini, V.P. Denysenkov, M. Gafurov, S. Lyubenova, B. Endeward, M. Bennati, T.F. Prisner, Appl. Magn. Reson. 34 (2008) 399.
77. B. Quesson, J.a. de Zwart, C.T. Moonen, J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 12 (2000) 525.
78. J. Hindman, J. Chem. Phys. 44 (1966) 4582.
79. S. Un, T. Prisner, R.T. Weber, M.J. Seaman, K.W. Fishbein, A.E. Mcdermott, D.J. Singel, R.G. Griffin, Chem. Phys. Lett. 189 (1992) 54.
80. T. Maly, G.T. Debelouchina, V.S. Bajaj, K.N. Hu, C.G. Joo, M.L. Mak-Jurkauskas, J.R. Sirigiri, P.C.a. van der Wel, J. Herzfeld, R.J. Temkin, R.G. Griffin, J. Chem. Phys. 128 (2008) 052211.
81. R. Buchner, G. Hefter, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 (2009) 8984.
82. J. Jackson, Plane Electromagnetic Waves and Wave Propagation, Classical Electrodynamics, John Wiley & Sons, 1999. Chapter 7.
83. M. Heyden, J. Sun, S. Funkner, G. Mathias, H. Forbert, M. Havenith, D. Marx, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (2010) 12068.
84. U. Kaatze, J. Chem. Eng. Data 34 (1989) 371.
85. H. Yada, M. Nagai, K. Tanaka, Chem. Phys. Lett. 473 (2009) 279.
86. B. Halle, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London [Biol.] 359 (2004) 1207.
87. D.K. Green, J.G. Powles, Proc. Phys. Soc. 85 (1965) 87.
88. 1,j, as the model is in the extreme narrowing limit.
89. 1 experiment (as in the full inversion or saturation recovery experiment).
90. J. Cavanagh, W.J. Fairbrother, A.G. Palmer, M. Rance, N.J. Skelton, Protein NMR spectroscopy: Principles and practice, Academic Press, San Diego, 2007.
91. 1,HH as 0.
92. G.L. Ellman, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 74 (1958) 443.
93. E. Becker, J. Ferretti, R. Gupta, G. Weiss, J. Magn. Reson. 37 (1980) 381.
94. More technical specifications for this probe will be introduced in a future publication: [95].
95. J.M. Franck, G. Wylde, S. Han, unpublished results.
96. 1 field per unit power, of the new "pass through probe" is the same or greater than that of the older "open bottom probe" and greater than that of the commercial ENDOR probe.
97. However, we also caution that while the modes of sample motion that describe the motion of water near the nitroxide are likely equilibrated with the dielectrically excited modes of the bulk water, to the best of our knowledge, it has not yet been proven whether or not such an equilibration should take place under the experimental situation relevant to ODNP. This is especially true since the sample resides in a small capillary tube, where the bulk water that interacts with the capillary is continuously cooled, while the timescales associated with the exchange and heat transfer between the bulk water and the hydration water are unknown.
98. The typical covariance analysis of the asymptotic data becomes unusually complicated as a result of the fact that the correlation of the uncertainty between enhancement measurements is very high as a result of the normalization procedure. The development of a method to automatically process such data and compute such errors is currently underway.
99. R. Kausik, S. Han, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 7732.
100. C.Y. Cheng, J.Y. Wang, R. Kausik, K.Y.C. Lee, S. Han, J. Magn. Reson. 215 (2012) 115.
101. C.Y. Cheng, O.J.G.M. Goor, S. Han, Anal. Chem. 84 (2012) 8936.
102. C.Y. Cheng, S. Han, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. (2013).
103. K.M. Stone, J. Voska, M. Kinnebrew, A. Pavlova, M.J.N. Junk, S. Han, Biophys. J. 104 (2013) 472.
104. R. Kausik, A. Srivastava, P.A. Korevaar, G. Stucky, J.H. Waite, S. Han, Macromolecules 42 (2009) 7404.
105. H. Frauenfelder, G. Chen, J. Berendzen, P. Fenimore, H. Jansson, B. McMahon, I. Stroe, J. Swenson, R. Young, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106 (2009) 5129.
106. Y. Zhang, P. Cremer, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61 (2010) 63.
107. A. Patel, P. Varilly, D. Chandler, J. Phys. Chem. B 114 (2010) 1632.
108. ρ is calculated from the denominator on the right side of Eq. (23).