Thematic Research Collections

A Companion to Digital Humanities

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 348-365

  Palmer, Carole L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital resources; Humanities; Libraries; Research; Researmaterials

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890256747     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470999875.ch24     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Ash, L. (1993). Subject Collections, 7th edn. New Providence, NJ: R. R. Bowker.
2. Atkinson, R. (1998). Managing Traditional Materials in an Online Environment: Some Definitions and Distinctions for a Future Collection Management. Library Resources and Technical Services 42: 7-20.
3. Bates, M. J. (1994). The Design of Databases and Other Information Resources for Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report no. 4. Online and CDROM Review 18: 331-40.
4. Brockman, W. S., L. Neumann, C. L. Palmer, and T. Tidline (2001). Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation and the Council on Library and Information Resources. Accessed November 26, 2002. At .
5. Buckland, M. (1992). Collections Reconsidered. In Redesigning Library Services: A Manifesto (pp. 54-61). Chicago: American Library Association.
6. Buckland, M. (1995). What Will Collection Developers Do? Information Technologies and Libraries 14: 155-9.
7. Condron, F., M. Fraser, and S. Sutherland (2001). Oxford University Computing Services Guide to Digital Resources for the Humanities. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Press.
8. Crane, G. and J. A. Rydberg-Cox (2000). New Technology and New Roles: The Need for "Corpus Editors." Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 252-3), June 2-7, San Antonio, Texas.
9. Crane, G., C. E. Wulfman, and D. A. Smith (2001). Building a Hypertextual Digital Library in the Humanities: A Case Study of London. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 426-34), June 24-28, Roanoke, Virginia.
10. Finholt, T. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36: 73-107.
11. Fraser, M. (2000). From Concordances to Subject Portals: Supporting the Text-centred Humanities Community. Computers and the Humanities 34: 265-78.
12. King, D. W. and E. C. Bryant (1971). The Evaluation of Information Services and Products. Washington, DC: Information Resources Press.
13. Lagoze, C. and D. Fielding (1998). Defining Collections in Distributed Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine, November. Accessed November 26, 2002. At .
14. Lee, H.-L. (2000). What Is a Collection? Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51: 1106-13.
15. McGann, J. (1996). The Rossetti Archive and Image-based Electronic Editing. In R. J. Finneran (ed.), The Literary Text in the Digital Age (pp. 145-83). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
16. Palmer, C. L. (ed.) (1996). Navigating among the Disciplines: The Library and Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Library Trends 45.
17. Palmer, C. L. (2000). Configuring Digital Research Collections around Scholarly Work. Paper presented at Digital Library Federation Forum, November 19, Chicago, Illinois. Accessed November 26, 2002. At .
18. Palmer, C. L., and L. J. Neumann (2002). The Information Work of Interdisciplinary Humanities Scholars: Exploration and Translation. Library Quarterly 72: 85-117.
19. Schreibman, S. (2002). Computer-mediated Texts and Textuality: Theory and Practice. Computers and the Humanities 36: 283-93.
20. Smith, M. N. (1999). Because the Plunge from the Front Overturned Us: The Dickinson Electronic Archives Project. Studies in the Literary Imagination 32: 133-51.
21. Taylor, A. (1999). The Organization of Information. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
22. Unsworth, J. (1996). Electronic Scholarship: or, Scholarly Publishing and the Public. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 28: 3-12.
23. Unsworth, J. (2000a). Scholarly Primitives: What Methods Do Humanities Researchers Have in Common, and How Might Our Tools Reflect This? Paper presented at symposium, Humanities Computing: Formal Methods, Experimental Practice, May 13, King's College London. Accessed November 26, 2002. At .
24. Unsworth, J. (2000b). Thematic Research Collections. Paper presented at Modern Language Association Annual Conference, December 28, Washington, DC. Accessed November 26, 2002. At .
25. Urbina, E., R. Furuta, A. Goenka, R. Kochumman, E. Melgoza, and C. Monroy (2002). Critical Editing in the Digital Age: Informatics and Humanities Research. In J. Frow (ed.), The New Information Order and the Future of the Archive. Conference proceedings, Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, March 20-23, University of Edinburgh. Accessed November 26, 2002. At .
26. Viscomi, J. (2002). Digital Facsimiles: Reading theWilliam Blake Archive. Computers and the Humanities 36: 27-48.
27. Waters, D. J. (1998). What Are Digital Libraries? CLIR Issues 4 (July/August). Accessed December 23, 2002. At .