Recent developments in decision analysis for forest management

Forestry and Environmental Change: Socioeconomic and Political Dimensions: Report No. 5 of the IUFRO Task Force on Environmental Change

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 239-256

  Mendoza, G A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890218284     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Axelrod, R. (ed.) (1976) Structure of Decision. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Bana e Costa, C.A. and Vansnick, J.C. (1997) Applications of the MACBETH approach in the framework of an additive aggregation model. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 6, 107-114.
3. Bana e Costa, C.A., Ensslin, L., Correa, E. and Vansnick, J.C. (1999) Decision support systems in action: integrated application in a multi-criteria decision aid process. European Journal of Operational Research 113, 315-335.Banxia Software LTD" (2000) [http://www.banxia.com]
4. Bare, B.B. and Mendoza, GA. (1992) Timber harvest scheduling in a fuzzy decision environment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22, 423-428.
5. Barreteau, O. and Bousquet, F. (2000) SHADOC: a multi-agent model to tackle variability of irrigated systems. Annals of Operations Research 94, 139-162.
6. Belton, V. and Stewart, T. (2001) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
7. Belton, V., Ackermann, K and Shepherd, 1. (1997) Integrated support from problem structuring through to alternative evaluation using COPE and V.I.S.A. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis 6, 115-130.
8. Bettinger, P., Johnson, N. and Sessions, J. (1996) Forest planning in an Oregon case study: defining the problem and attempting to meet goals with a spatial analysis technique. Environmental Management 20(4), 565-577.
9. Bettinger, P., Sessions, J. and Boston, K. (1997) Using tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecological Modeling 94, 111-123.
10. Bettinger, P., Boston, K. and Sessions, J. (1999) Intensifying a heuristic forest harvest scheduling search procedure with 2-opt decision choice. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29, 1784-1792.
11. Bos, J. (1993) Zoning in forest management: a quadratic assignment problem solved by simulated annealing. Journal of Environmental Management 37, 127-145.
12. Bousquet, F., Bakarn. I., Proton, H., and Le Page, C. (1998) Cormas: common pool resources and multi-agent systems. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1416, 826- 838.
13. Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., d'Aquino, P., Etienne, M., Boissau, S., Aubert, S., Le Page, C, Babin, D. and CasteDa, J.-C. (2002). Multi-agent systems and role games: collective learning processes for ecosystem management. In: Janssen, M., et al. Complexity and Ecosystem Management: The Theory and Practice of Multi-agent Approaches. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
14. Buongiorno, J. and Gillcs, K. (2003) Decision Methods for Forest Resource Management. Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
15. Chambers, R. and Guijt, 1.(1995) PRA five years later - Where are we now? Forest, Trees and People 26/27, 4-14.
16. Checkland, P.B. (1981) Systems Thinking Systems Practice. Wiley, Chichester.
17. Checkland, P.B. (1988) Soft systems methodology: overview. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 15,27-30.
18. Church, R., Murray, A. and Weintraub, A. (1998) Locational issue's in, forest management. Location Science 6, 137-153.
19. Coyle, G. (2000) Qualitative and quantitative modeling in system dynamics: some research questions. Systems Dynamics Review 16(3), 225-244.
20. Davis, L. and Johnson, N. (1987) Forest Management, 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill, Columbus, Ohio.
21. Davis, L., .lohnson, N., Bettinger, P. and Howard, T. (2000) Forest Management. To Sustain Ecological, Economic, and Social Values, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, Columbus, Ohio.
22. De Steiguer, J.E., Liberti, L., Schulcr, A. and Hansen, B. (2003) Multi-Criteria Decision Models for Forestry and Natural Resources Management: An Annotated Bibliography. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-307, USDA Forest Service Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.
23. Eden, C. (1988) Cognitive mapping: a review. European Journal of Operational Research 36, 1-13.
24. Eden, C. (1989) Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In: Rosenhead, J., et al. Rational Analysis of a Problematic World. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester and New York.
25. Eden, C. and Ackermann, F. (1998) Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic-Management. Sage Publications, London.
26. Forrester, J.W. (1961) Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
27. Forrester, J.W. (1999) System Dynamics: The Foundation Under Systems Thinking. Sloan School of Management,. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachussetts.
28. Hobbs, B.F., Ludsin, S., Knight, R.L., Ryan, P.A., Biberhofer, J. and Ciborowski, J.J. (2002) Fuzzy cognitive mapping as a tool to define management objectives for complex ecosystems. Ecological Applications 12, 1548-1565.
29. Hof, J. and Bevers, M. (2000) Direct spatial optimization in natural resource management: four linear programming examples. Annals of Operations Research 95, 67-81.
30. Hogeweg, P. and Hesper, B. (1990) Individual-oriented modelling in ecology. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 13, 83-90.
31. Howard, A. (1991) A critical look at multiple criteria decision-making techniques with reference to forestry applications. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21, 1649-1659.
32. Huston, M. and DeAngelis, D. (1988) New computer models unify ecological theory. Bioscience 38, 682-691.
33. Jankowski, P. (1995) Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision making methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems9,251-273.
34. jankowski, P., Nyergcs, T.L., Smith, A., Moore, T.J. and Horvath, E. (1997) Spatial group choice. A SDSS tool for collaborative spatial decision making. International Journal' for Geographical Information Science 1 1, 576-602.
35. Kangas, J. (1992) Multiple use planning of forest resources by using the analytic .hierarchy process. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 7, 259-268.
36. Keeney, R.L. (1992) Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Kent, B. (1989) Forest Service Land Management Planning: Introduction to Linear Programming. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-173, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
38. Kosko, B. (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1, 65-75.
39. Kyem, P.A.K. (2002) Using G1S to support multi-objective decision-making in forest management: an experience from Ghana, West Africa. In: Pukkala, T. (cd.). Multi-objective Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
40. Leusehner, W.A. (1984) Introduction to Forest Resource Management. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
41. Lockwood, C. and Moore, T. (1992) Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, 468-478.
42. Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. (2000a) Multiple criteria analysis for assessing criteria and indicators in sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory decision making in a Kalimantan forest. Environmental Management 26(6), 659-673.
43. Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. (2000b) Multiple criteria decision making approaches to assessing forest sustainability using criteria and indicators: a case study. Forest Ecology and Management 131, 107-126.
44. Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. (2003a) Qualitative multi-criteria approaches to assessing indicators of sustainable forest resource management. Forest Ecology and Management 174, 329-343.
45. Mendoza, G.A, and Prabhu, R. (2003b) Enhancing Participatory Planning of Community-managed Forests using Problem Structuring Models and Approaches: Experiences from a Case Study. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences. Working paper 2003-2. University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.
46. Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. (2004) Fuzzy methodologies for assessing criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators 3(4), 227-236.
47. Mendoza, G.A. and Sprouse, W. (1989). Forest planning and decision-making under fuzzy environments: an overview and illustration. Forest Science 35, 481-502.
48. Mowrer, H.T. (1997) Decision Support Systems for Ecosystem Management: an Evaluation of Existing Systems. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-GTR-296, USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
49. Murray, A. and Church, R. (1995) Heuristic solution approaches to operational planning problems. OR Spektrum 17, 193-203.
50. Nelson, J. and Brodie, D. (1990) Comparison of random search algorithm and mixed integer programming for solving area-based forest plans. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20, 934-942.
51. Ozesmi, U. and Ozesmi, S. (2003) A participatory approach to ecosystem conservation: fuzzy cognitive maps and stakeholder group analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey. Environmental Management 31,518-53 1.
52. Prato, T. (2000) Multiple attribute evaluation of landscape management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 60, 325-337
53. Pukkala, T. et al. (2002) Multi-objective Forest Planning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
54. Pukkala, T. and Kangas, J. (1996) A method for integrating risk and attitude, into forest planning. Forest Science 42(2), 198-205.
55. Purnomo, H., Mendoza, G.A. and Prabhu, R. (2004) A model for collaborative planning for community managed resources based on qualitative soft systems approach. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 16(1), 106-131.
56. Purnomo, H., Mendoza, G.A., Prabhu, R. and Yasmi, Y. (2005) Developing multi-stakeholder forest management scenarios: a multi-agent system simulation approach. Forest Policy and Economics 7(4), 475-491.
57. Rauscher, H.M. (1999) Ecosystem management decision support for federal forests in the United States: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 114, 173-197.
58. Reynolds, K., Bjork, J., Hershey, R.R., Schmoldt, D., Payne, J., King, S., DeCola, L., Twery, M. and Cunningham, P. (2000) Decision support for ecosystem management. In: Johnson, N.C., Malk, A.J., Sexton, W.T. and Szaro, R.C. (eds) Ecological Stewardship: A Common Reference for Ecosystem Management. Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam, pp. 687-721.
59. Reynolds, K.M., Johnson, K.N. and Gordon, S. (2003) The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. Forest Policy and Economics 5, 433-446.
60. Richardson, G.P. and Anderson, D.F. (1995) Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review 11,1 13-137.
61. Rosenhead, R. et al. (1989) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester and New York.
62. Rouchier, J., Bousquct, F., Requier-Dejardins, M. and Antona, M. (2001) A multi-agent model for transhumance in North Cameroon. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25, 527-559.
63. Saaty, T. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
64. Schmoldt, D.L. and Peterson, D, (2000) Analytical group decision making in natural resources: methodology and application. Forest Science 46(1), 62-75.
65. Schmoldt, D.L., Peterson, D. and Silsbee, D. (1995) The analytic hierarchy process and participatory decision making. In: Strome, T.C. and Daniels, M. (eds) Decision Support 2001, Proceedings of the 4th Biennial International Symposium for Advanced Technology in Natural Resource Management. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD.
66. Schmoldt, D., Kangas, J., Mendoza, G. and Pesonon, M. (2001) The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
67. Schon, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
68. Sel.ener, D. (1997) Participatory Action Research and Social Change. The Cornell Participatory Action Research Network, Cornell University, New York.
69. Snyder, S. and Revelle, C. (1997) Multi-objective grid packing made); an, application, Location Science 5(3), 165-1 80.
70. Stone, P. and Veloso, M. (1997) Multiagent Systems: A Survey from a Machine Learning Perspective. Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. [http://www-2.os.cniu,edu/afs/cs/usr/psto.ne/public/papers/97MAS-survey/revised-survey.html]
71. Sycara, K. (2000) Multi-agent systems (a subtopic of agents). American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), http://www.aaai.org/AITopies/html/multi.html,
72. Thebaud, O. and Locatelli, B. (2001) Modeling the emergence of resource sharing conventions: An agent-based approach. Journal of Societies and Social Simulation 4(2), http://www.soc.surrey.ac.Uk/JASS/4/2/3.html.
73. Varma, V.K., Ferguson, I. and Wild, 1. (2000). Decision support system for sustainable forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 128, 49-55.
74. Vennix, J. (1996) Group Mode! Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
75. Weintraub, A., Jones, G., Meacham, M., Magendazo, A., Magendazo, A. and Malchuk, D. (1995) Heuristic procedures for solving mixed-integer harvest scheduling- tran spoliation planning models. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25, 1618-1626.
76. Weintraub, A., Church, R., Murray, A. and Gurnard, M. (2000) Forest management models and combinatorial algorithms; analysis of state of the art. Annals of Operations Research 96, 271-285.
77. Wolstenholme, E.F. (1999) Qualitative vs. quantitative modeling: the evolving balance. Journal of Operational Research Society 50, 422-428.
78. Zadeh, L. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information Control 8, 338-353