Scientific, institutional, and individual constraints on restoring puget sound rivers

Urban Ecology: An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 647-659

  Ryan, Clare M ^a   Jensen, Sara M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

policy; restoration; science policy interface; scientific method; urban rivers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890212872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5_42     Document Type: Chapter

References (12)

1. Adams, P.W. and A.B. Hairston. 1996. Calling all experts: Using science to direct policy. Journal of Forestry 94(4):27-30.
2. Antypas, A. and E.E. Meidinger. 1996. Science-intensive policy disputes: An analytic overview of the literature. People and Natural Resources Program, USFS, PNW Research Station.
3. Brown, K. 2000. A new breed of scientist-advocate emerges. News Focus. Science 287:1192-1195.
4. Currens, K.P., H.W. Li, J.D. McIntyre, D.R. Montgomery, and D.W. Reiser. 2000. Review of "Statewide Strategy to Recover Salmon: Extinction is Not an Option." Report 2000-1, Independent Science Panel, Olympia,Washington. Funtowicz, S. and J. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739-52.
5. Hanley, T.A. 1994. Interaction of wildlife research and forest management: The need for maturation of science and policy. Forestry Chronicle 70:527-532.
6. Hellstrom, T. 1996. The science-policy dialogue in transformation: Model-uncertainty and environmental policy. Science and Public Policy 23:91-97.
7. Jager, J. 1998. Current thinking on using scientific findings in environmental policy making. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 3:143-153.
8. Kaiser, J. 2000. Ecologists on a mission to save the world. News Focus. Science 287:1188-1192.
9. Ruckleshaus, W.D. 2000. Turning on the money spigot to save the salmon. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, July 23, 2000.
10. Szaro, R.C., J. Berc, S. Cameron, S. Cordle, M. Crosby, L. Martin, D. Norton, R. O'Mallay, and G. Ruark. 1998.The ecosystem approach: Science and information management issues, gaps and needs. Landscape and Urban Planning 40:89-101.
11. Taylor, S. 1984. Making Bureaucracies Think: The Environmental Impact Statement Strategy of Administrative Reform. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
12. Yaffee, S. 1997. Why environmental policy nightmares recur. Conservation Biology 11:328-337.