An integrated approach to realizing high-performance liquid-junction quantum dot sensitized solar cells

Nature Communications

Volumn 4, Issue , 2013, Pages

  McDaniel, Hunter ^a   Fuke, Nobuhiro ^b   Makarov, Nikolay S ^a   Pietryga, Jeffrey M ^a   Klimov, Victor I ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b SHARP CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHANOL; QUANTUM DOT;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DESIGN; FUEL CELL; INTEGRATED APPROACH; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOLAR POWER; SOLAR RADIATION;

ARTICLE; CELL JUNCTION; CELL TYPE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; QUANTUM DOT SENSITIZED SOLAR CELL; QUANTUM YIELD; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMICONDUCTOR; VAPOR PRESSURE;

EID: 84890201424     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3887     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Kamat, P. V. Quantum dot solar cells. the next big thing in photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 908-918 (2013).
2. Luther, J. M. et al. Stability assessment on a 3% bilayer PbS/ZnO quantum dot heterojunction solar cell. Adv. Mater. 22, 3704-3707 (2010).
3. Ip, A. H. et al. Hybrid passivated colloidal quantum dot solids. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 577-582 (2012).
4. Semonin, O. E. et al. Peak external photocurrent quantum efficiency exceeding 100% via MEG in a quantum dot solar cell. Science 334, 1530-1533 (2011).
5. Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of P-N junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510-519 (1961).
6. Sargent, E. H. Infrared photovoltaics made by solution processing. Nat. Photon. 3, 325-331 (2009).
7. Mocatta, D. et al. Heavily doped semiconductor nanocrystal quantum dots. Science 332, 77-81 (2011).
8. Tang, J. et al. Quantum junction solar cells. Nano Lett. 12, 4889-4894 (2012).
9. Ning, Z. J. et al. Graded doping for enhanced colloidal quantum dot photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 25, 1719-1723 (2013).
10. Oregan, B. & Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar-cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737-740 (1991). (Pubitemid 21912607)
11. Kamat, P. V., Tvrdy, K., Baker, D. R. & Radich, J. G. Beyond photovoltaics: semiconductor nanoarchitectures for liquid-junction solar cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6664-6688 (2010).
12. Yella, A. et al. Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12 percent efficiency. Science 334, 629-634 (2011).
13. Hardin, B. E., Snaith, H. J. & McGehee, M. D. The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Photon. 6, 162-169 (2012).
14. Vogel, R., Pohl, K. & Weller, H. Sensitization of highly porous, polycrystalline TiO2 electrodes by quantum sized CdS. Chem. Phys. Lett. 174, 241-246 (1990).
15. Liu, D. & Kamat, P. V. Photoelectrochemical behavior of thin CdSe and coupled TiO2 CdSe semiconductor-films. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10769-10773 (1993).
16. Vogel, R., Hoyer, P. & Weller, H. Quantum-sized PbS, CdS, Ag2S, Sb2S3, and Bi2S3 particles as sensitizers for various nanoporous wide-bandgap semiconductors. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 3183-3188 (1994).
17. Zaban, A., Micic, O. I., Gregg, B. A. & Nozik, A. J. Photosensitization of nanoporous TiO2 electrodes with InP quantum dots. Langmuir 14, 3153-3156 (1998). (Pubitemid 128559742)
18. Plass, R., Pelet, S., Krueger, J., Gratzel, M. & Bach, U. Quantum dot sensitization of organic-inorganic hybrid solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 7578-7580 (2002). (Pubitemid 35382989)
19. Robel, I., Subramanian, V., Kuno, M. & Kamat, P. V. Quantum dot solar cells. Harvesting light energy with CdSe nanocrystals molecularly linked to mesoscopic TiO2 films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2385-2393 (2006).
20. Santra, P. K. & Kamat, P. V. Tandem-layered quantum dot solar cells: tuning the photovoltaic response with luminescent ternary cadmium chalcogenides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 877-885 (2013).
21. Pan, Z. X. et al. Highly efficient inverted type-I CdS/CdSe core/shell structure qd-sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 6, 3982-3991 (2012).
22. Toyoda, T., Sato, J. & Shen, Q. Effect of sensitization by quantum-sized CdS on photoacoustic and photoelectrochemical current spectra of porous TiO2 electrodes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 297-299 (2003).
23. Lee, J. W. et al. Quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell with unprecedentedly high photocurrent. Sci. Rep. 3, 1050 (2013).
24. McDaniel, H., Fuke, N., Pietryga, J. M. & Klimov, V. I. Engineered CuInSexS2-x quantum dots for sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 355-361 (2013).
25. Li, T. L., Lee, Y. L. & Teng, H. High-performance quantum dot-sensitized solar cells based on sensitization with CuInS2 quantum dots/CdS heterostructure. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5315-5324 (2012).
26. Lin, C. Y., Teng, C. Y., Li, T. L., Lee, Y. L. & Teng, H. S. Photoactive p-type PbS as a counter electrode for quantum dot-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 1155-1162 (2013).
27. Santra, P. K., Nair, P. V., Thomas, K. G. & Kamat, P. V. CuInS2-sensitized quantum dot solar cell. electrophoretic deposition, excited-state dynamics, and photovoltaic performance. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 722-729 (2013).
28. Pernik, D. R., Tvrdy, K., Radich, J. G. & Kamat, P. V. Tracking the adsorption and electron injection rates of CdSe quantum dots on TiO2: linked versus direct attachment. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 13511-13519 (2011).
29. Stolle, C. J., Harvey, T. B. & Korgel, B. A. Nanocrystal photovoltaics: a review of recent progress. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2, 160-167 (2013).
30. Li, L. A. et al. Efficient synthesis of highly luminescent copper indium sulfidebased core/shell nanocrystals with surprisingly long-lived emission. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1176-1179 (2011).
31. Park, J. & Kim, S. W. CuInS2/ZnS core/shell quantum dots by cation exchange and their blue-shifted photoluminescence. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 3745-3750 (2011).
32. Sun, J. H., Zhao, J. L. & Masumoto, Y. Shell-thickness-dependent photoinduced electron transfer from CuInS2/ZnS quantum dots to TiO2 films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 053119 (2013).
33. Gonzalez-Pedro, V., Xu, X. Q., Mora-Sero, I. & Bisquert, J. Modeling high-efficiency quantum dot sensitized solar cells. ACS Nano 4, 5783-5790 (2010).
34. de la Fuente, M. S. et al. Effect of organic and inorganic passivation in quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1519-1525 (2013).
35. Zewdu, T., Clifford, J. N. & Palomares, E. Synergistic effect of ZnS outer layers and electrolyte methanol content on efficiency in TiO2/CdS/CdSe sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 13076-13080 (2012).
36. Fuke, N. et al. CdSe quantum-dot-sensitized solar cell with B100% internal quantum efficiency. ACS Nano 4, 6377-6386 (2010).
37. Ziolek, M., Martin, C., Sun, L. C. & Douhal, A. Effect of electrolyte composition on electron injection and dye regeneration dynamics in complete organic dye sensitized solar cells probed by time-resolved laser spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 26227-26238 (2012).
38. Juozapavicius, M., Kaucikas, M., van Thor, J. J. & O'Regan, B. C. Observation of multiexponential pico- to subnanosecond electron injection in optimized dye-sensitized solar cells with visible-pump mid-infrared-probe transient absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 116-123 (2013).
39. McGuire, J. A., Sykora, M., Joo, J., Pietryga, J. M. & Klimov, V. I. Apparent versus true carrier multiplication yields in semiconductor nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 10, 2049-2057 (2010).
40. Padilha, L. A., Bae, W. K., Klimov, V. I., Pietryga, J. M. & Schaller, R. D. Response of semiconductor nanocrystals to extremely energetic excitation. Nano Lett. 13, 925-932 (2013).
41. McGuire, J. A. et al. Spectroscopic signatures of photocharging due to hotcarrier transfer in solutions of semiconductor nanocrystals under low-intensity ultraviolet excitation. ACS Nano 4, 6087-6097 (2010).
42. Robel, I., Kuno, M. & Kamat, P. V. Size-dependent electron injection from excited CdSe quantum dots into TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 4136-4137 (2007). (Pubitemid 46595417)
43. Herman, G. S., Dohnalek, Z., Ruzycki, N. & Diebold, U. Experimental investigation of the interaction of water and methanol with anatase-TiO2(101). J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 2788-2795 (2003).
44. Yamakata, A., Ishibashi, T. & Onishi, H. Electron- and hole-capture reactions on Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst exposed to methanol vapor studied with timeresolved infrared absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 9122-9125 (2002). (Pubitemid 35382845)
45. Balaur, E., Macak, J. M., Tsuchiya, H. & Schmuki, P. Wetting behaviour of layers of TiO2 nanotubes with different diameters. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 4488-4491 (2005). (Pubitemid 41642730)
46. Wang, R. et al. Light-induced amphiphilic surfaces. Nature 388, 431-432 (1997).
47. Bang, J. H. & Kamat, P. V. Quantum dot sensitized solar cells. A tale of two semiconductor nanocrystals: CdSe and CdTe. ACS Nano 3, 1467-1476 (2009).
48. Salant, A. et al. Quantum rod-sensitized solar cell: nanocrystal shape effect on the photovoltaic properties. Nano Lett. 12, 2095-2100 (2012).
49. Guijarro, N., Lana-Villarreal, T., Mora-Sero, I., Bisquert, J. & Gomez, R. CdSe quantum dot-sensitized TiO2 electrodes: effect of quantum dot coverage and mode of attachment. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 4208-4214 (2009).