Bayesian sample size determination for case-control studies when exposure may be misclassified

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 178, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1673-1679

  Joseph, Lawrence ^a,b   Bélisle, Patrick ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; Case control study; Misclassification error; Sample size determination; Study design

Indexed keywords

ALLERGY; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DATA; DESIGN; DISEASE; PROBABILITY;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CASE CONTROL STUDY; EXPOSURE; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PEANUT ALLERGY; PROBABILITY; RECALL BIAS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAMPLE SIZE; STUDY DESIGN;

BAYESIAN METHODS; CASE-CONTROL STUDY; MISCLASSIFICATION ERROR; SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION; STUDY DESIGN;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIET; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; ODDS RATIO; PEANUT HYPERSENSITIVITY; SAMPLE SIZE;

ARACHIS HYPOGAEA;

EID: 84890102148     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwt181     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Greenland S. Multiple-bias modeling for analysis of observational data. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 2005;168(2):267-306.
2. Greenland S, Lash TL. Bias analysis. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, eds. Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Wolters- Kluwer; 2008:345-380.
3. Hoggatt KJ, Greenland S, Ritz B. Adjustment for response bias via two phase analysis: An application. Epidemiology. 2009;20(6):872-879.
4. Greene N, Greenland S, Olsen J, et al. Estimating bias from loss to follow-up in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Epidemiology. 2011;22(6):815-822.
5. Schlesselman JJ. Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1982.
6. Du Toit G, Katz Y, Sasieni P, et al. Early consumption of peanuts in infancy is associated with a low prevalence of peanut allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122(5):984-991.
7. Wickramaratne PJ. Sample size determination in epidemiologic studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1995;4(4):311-337.
8. Lemeshow S, Hosmer D, Klar J, et al. Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies. Chichester, England: JohnWiley & Sons Ltd; 1990.
9. Rahme E, Joseph L, Gyorkos T. Bayesian sample size determination for estimating binomial parameters from data subject to misclassification. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2000;49(1):119-128.
10. Dendukuri N, Rahme E, Blisle P, et al. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic studies in the absence of a gold standard test. Biometrics. 2004;60(2):388-397.
11. Gustafson P. Sample size implications when biases are modelled rather than ignored. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 2006; 169(4):865-881.
12. Stamey J, Seaman J, Young D. Bayesian sample size determination for inference on two binomial populations with no gold standard classifier. Stat Med. 2005;24(19):2963-2976.
13. De Santis F, Perone Pacifico M, Sambucini V. Optimal predictive sample size for case-control studies. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2004;53(3):427-441.
14. M'Lan CE, Joseph L,Wolfson DB. Bayesian sample size determination for case-control studies. J Am Stat Assoc. 2006;101(474):760-772.
15. Devine OJ, Smith JM. Estimating sample size for epidemiologic studies: The impact of ignoring exposure measurement uncertainty. Stat Med. 1998;17(12):1375-1389.
16. Gustafson P. Measurement Error and Misclassification in Statistics and Epidemiology. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 2004.
17. Stamey J, Gerlach R. Bayesian sample size determination for case-control studies with misclassification. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2007;51(6):2982-2992.
18. Gustafson P, Le ND, Saskin R. Case-control analysis with partial knowledge of exposure misclassification probabilities. Biometrics. 2001;57(2):598-609.
19. Ben-Shoshan M, Kagan R, Alizadehfar R, et al. Is the prevalence of peanut allergy increasing A five-year follow-up study on the prevalence of peanut allergy in primary school children in Montreal. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009; 123(4):783-788.
20. Gelfand AE,Wang F. A simulation-based approach to Bayesian sample size determination for performance under a given model and for separating models. Stat Sci. 2002; 17(2):193-208.
21. Chen M-H, Shao Q-M. Monte Carlo estimation of Bayesian credible and HPD intervals. J Comput Graph Stat. 1999; 8(1):69-92.