Peer-assisted content distribution in Akamai netsession

Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 31-42

  Zhao, Mingchen ^a   Aditya, Paarijaat ^b   Chen, Ang ^a   Lin, Yin ^a,d   Haeberlen, Andreas ^a   Druschel, Peter ^b   Maggs, Bruce ^c,d   Wishon, Bill ^d   Ponec, Miroslav ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR SOFTWARE SYSTEMS   (Germany)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Content distribution networks; Peer to peer systems

Indexed keywords

CONTENT DELIVERY NETWORK; CONTENT DISTRIBUTION; CONTENT DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS; CONTENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS; HYBRID DESIGN; LOSS OF PERFORMANCE; PEER-TO-PEER SYSTEM; POTENTIAL RISKS;

MEASUREMENTS;

DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84890099748     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2504730.2504752     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. P. Aditya, M. Zhao, Y. Lin, A. Haeberlen, P. Druschel, B. Maggs, and B. Wishon. Reliable client accounting for hybrid content-distribution networks. In Proc. NSDI, Apr. 2012.
2. Akamai. EdgeScape brochure. http://www.akamai.com/dl/brochures/edgescape. pdf.
3. Akamai Technologies. NetSession design principles. http://www.akamai.com/ html/solutions/client-design-principles.html.
4. R. Bhagwan, S. Savage, and G. M. Voelker. Understanding availability. In Proc. IPTPS, 2003.
5. A. R. Bharambe, C. Herley, and V. N. Padmanabhan. Analyzing and improving a BitTorrent network's performance mechanisms. In Proc. INFOCOM, 2006.
6. CAIDA. Archipelago measurement infrastructure. http://www.caida.org/ projects/ark/.
7. D. R. Choffnes and F. E. Bustamante. Taming the Torrent. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2008.
8. B. Cohen. Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In Proc. P2PEcon, June 2003.
9. S. A. Crosby and D. S. Wallach. An analysis of BitTorrent's two Kademlia-based DHTs. Technical Report TR-07-04, Department of Computer Science, Rice University, May 2007.
10. J. Dilley, B. Maggs, J. Parikh, H. Prokop, R. Sitaraman, and B. Weihl. Globally distributed content delivery. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(5):50-58, Sept. 2002.
11. M. Dischinger, A. Haeberlen, K. P. Gummadi, and S. Saroiu. Characterizing residential broadband networks. In Proc. IMC, Oct. 2007.
12. M. J. Freedman. Experiences with CoralCDN: A five-year operational view. In Proc. NSDI, 2010.
13. K. P. Gummadi, R. Dunn, S. Saroiu, S. Gribble, H. Levy, and J. Zahorjan. Measurement, modeling and analysis of a peer-to-peer file-sharing workload. In Proc. SOSP, Oct. 2003.
14. L. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Xiao, E. Tan, X. Ding, and X. Zhang. Measurements, analysis, and modeling of BitTorrent-like systems. In Proc. IMC, 2005.
15. X. Hei, C. Liang, J. Liang, Y. Liu, and K. Ross. A measurement study of a large-scale P2P IPTV system. Multimedia, IEEE Trans., 9(8):1672-1687, Dec. 2007.
16. C. Huang, A. Wang, J. Li, and K. W. Ross. Understanding hybrid CDN-P2P: Why Limelight needs its own Red Swoosh. In NOSSDAV, 2008.
17. T. Karagiannis, P. Rodriguez, and K. Papagiannaki. Should Internet service providers fear peer-assisted content distribution? In Proc. IMC, 2005.
18. D. Levin, K. LaCurts, N. Spring, and B. Bhattacharjee. BitTorrent is an auction: Analyzing and improving BitTorrent's incentives. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2008.
19. H. C. Li, A. Clement, M. Marchetti, M. Kapritsos, L. Robison, L. Alvisi, and M. Dahlin. FlightPath: Obedience vs. choice in cooperative services. In Proc. OSDI, 2008.
20. Z. Lu, Y. Wang, and Y. R. Yang. An analysis and comparison of CDN-P2P-hybrid content delivery system and model. JCM, 7(3):232-245, 2012.
21. W. E. Mackay. Triggers and barriers to customizing software. In Proc. CHI, Apr. 1991.
22. R. S. Peterson and E. G. Sirer. Antfarm: efficient content distribution with managed swarms. In Proc. NSDI, 2009.
23. M. Piatek, T. Isdal, T. Anderson, and A. Krishnamurthy. Do incentives build robustness in BitTorrent? In Proc. NSDI, 2007.
24. M. Piatek, H. V. Madhyastha, J. P. John, A. Krishnamurthy, and T. Anderson. Pitfalls for ISP-friendly P2P design. In Proc. HotNets, 2009.
25. J. Rosenberg, R. Mahy, P. Matthews, and D. Wing. Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN). RFC 5389, Oct. 2008.
26. S. Saroiu, K. P. Gummadi, R. J. Dunn, S. D. Gribble, and H. M. Levy. An analysis of Internet content delivery systems. In Proc. OSDI, 2002.
27. S. Saroiu, K. P. Gummadi, and S. Gribble. A measurement study of peer-to-peer file sharing systems. In Proc. MMCN, Jan. 2002.
28. T. Silverston and O. Fourmaux. Measuring P2P IPTV systems. In Proc. NOSSDAV, 2007.
29. M. Sirivianos, J. H. Park, R. Chen, and X. Yang. Free-riding in BitTorrent networks with the Large View exploit. In Proc. IPTPS, Feb. 2007.
30. M. Sirivianos, J. H. Park, X. Yang, and S. Jarecki. Dandelion: Cooperative content distribution with robust incentives. In Proc. USENIX ATC, 2007.
31. J. Spool. Do users change their settings? http://www.uie.com/brainsparks/ 2011/09/14/do-users-change-their-settings/.
32. K. Sripanidkulchai, B. Maggs, and H. Zhang. An analysis of live streaming workloads on the Internet. In Proc. IMC, 2004.
33. Velocix. Network architecture. http://www.velocix.com/network- architecture.php.
34. L. Vu, I. Gupta, K. Nahrstedt, and J. Liang. Understanding overlay characteristics of a large-scale peer-to-peer IPTV system. ACM Tr. Multim. Comp. Comm. Appl., 6:31:1-31:24, 2010.
35. H. Xie, R. Yang, A. Krishnamurthy, Y. Liu, and A. Silberschatz. P4P: Provider portal for applications. In Proc. SIGCOMM, 2008.
36. H. Yin, X. Liu, T. Zhan, V. Sekar, F. Qiu, C. Lin, H. Zhang, and B. Li. Design and deployment of a hybrid CDN-P2P system for live video streaming: experiences with LiveSky. In Proc. MM, 2009.